Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Supreme Court Vacancy & the Pro-Life Cause

The Supreme Court Vacancy & the Pro-Life Cause

Last updated on: September 21, 2020 at 9:19 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Supreme Court Vacancy & the Pro-Life Cause 2020-09-21T09:19:04-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The death of Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has poured gasoline on an already fiery presidential election. It creates the possibility that conservatives–including pro-lifers–could have solid control of the Supreme Court for a generation, even if Donald Trump loses the election.

As it has been up to now, 5 justices were identified as “conservative,” with 4 identified as “liberal.” But with Justice Ginsburg gone, there are only 3 “liberals” left. A conservative replacement would make the court 6-3.

Furthermore, one of the two remaining liberals, Justice Stephen Breyer is 82. In the next four years, Justice Sonia Sotomeyer and Elena Kagan may be the only liberal left, giving conservatives a hard-to-overcome 7-2 majority. (See this for the age of the judges.)

This vacancy makes the Supreme Court a major, maybe the major, issue in the presidential campaign. Quite a few Christians have become disenchanted with President Trump’s antics, with many pro-lifers thinking that presidents can’t really do much about abortion anyway, so that other issues can come to the fore. But a court in which Justice Ginsburg is replaced by a pro-life woman would surely overturn Roe v. Wade. And the question of who gets to make further nominations to the Supreme Court–which has become the final arbiter in culture war issues, as in same-sex marriage, takes on new urgency.

Conversely, the prospect of a conservative, pro-life Supreme Court has thrown pro-abortion liberals into a panic. In the hours after Justice Ginsburg’s death, record donations poured into the Democratic party, to the tune of $71 million. Both the pro-abortion and the anti-abortion sides are describing the Supreme Court vacancy as pivotal to their cause.

So should President Trump and Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell rush through a nomination and confirmation process just a few weeks before the November 3 presidential election? Shouldn’t the newly-elected president, whoever he may be, have the opportunity to make the nomination?

Sen. McConnell blocked President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court during the last year of his presidency, making the argument that the country should wait for a new president to make a nomination. So Democrats are infuriated that this nomination is going forward. They are accusing Sen. McConnell of hypocrisy for going against his own principle. Then again, Democrats back then had insisted that a sitting president has the right to make his nomination. They should be happy that Sen. McConnell has changed his views to accept their position. Of course, principles hardly enter into practices like these. In the words of Vice-Presidential candidate Kamala Harris, when asked why she is praising her running-mate Joe Biden, whom she excoriated as a segregationist in the primary debates, “That’s politics.” In controversies like these, each side can be expected to follow their own interests.

So can a new justice be confirmed before the election? Confirming judges is the business of the Republican-led Senate, with the Democratic-led House of Representatives having no say. Republicans control the Senate with a 53-47 majority. Most Senate actions are subject to a filibuster–the threat of endless debate, which takes a 2/3 vote to end–so that a 60 vote super-majority is necessary for most measures. But a recent rule impose by Democrats wanting to thwart Republicans removed the filibuster options for Supreme Court justices. So a simple majority is all that it would take to push through a new judge for the Supreme Court.

But this also means that the defection of four Republican senators could block the nomination. Already, two “pro-choice” Republicans–Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) & Susan Collins (R-Maine)–are saying they will not support a nomination before the election. But it’s hard to think of two more Republican senators who would be likely to join them.

Is there time? Most nominations since the 1970s have taken an average of 40 days to go through the process, so, yes, there is time to confirm before the election. But even if delaying tactics make it impossible to meet that deadline, the lame duck Senate and, should he be defeated, the lame duck President could still complete the confirmation until the constitutionally-required inauguration on January 20. So there would be plenty of time, though if Republicans were to pull this off despite losing the presidency and the Senate, Democrats would be apoplectic.

Then again, they already are. The media is describing the “fury” of the Left, which is calling for “total war.” If Republicans fill this vacancy, progressives are promising “retribution.” Specifically, they are threatening to pack the Supreme Court by increasing its membership, which is set by federal law, to 10 or 13 or 15, so that the conservative justices would be outnumbered. If they win the presidency, the Senate, and the Congress–as they fully expect to–they will also push through statehood for the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. This would give Democrats 4 more Senate seats.

They are thus willing to impose one-party rule and to do away with the ability of the judicial branch to check and balance the executive and the legislative branches. All to protect the “right” to an abortion.

If such threats are thwarted–for example, by Republicans keeping the Senate–a conservative Supreme Court could check and balance a Democratic administration and inhibit its more radical proposals.

At any rate, the upcoming election–which had been packaged as a referendum on Donald Trump’s character and his handling of the coronavirus epidemic–has now acquired much greater significance. As have the various Senate and Congressional races, which often get second-billing on November 3, but which can have enormous consequences.

This time voters will have a say on all three branches of government.

Photo: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg by Supreme Court of the United States / Public domain via Wikimedia Commons

Government

Life Issues

Politics

2020 Presidential election

abortion laws

President Donald Trump

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Sen. Mitch McConnell

Supreme Court

Supreme Court nominations

United States Senate

Previous Post

September 18, 2020

The Historic Evangelical Opposition to Abortion

Next Post

September 22, 2020 "The Ultimate Showdown between the Power of Man and the Power of God"

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Turns out, she wasn’t the right tool for the job."

1another

Luther on Tools

"You may have just given me my next sermon opening line."

1another

Luther on Tools

"So Katie Zacharia lasted only a demiScaramucci as press secretary......"

reg

Luther on Tools

"Apropos to the post on Gen Z a couple days ago: "If you want the ..."

Steve Bauer

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Vanity of vanities, all is vanity"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Job Solomon Isaiah David

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »