Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

geneveith

Are Certain Substances–Such As Those We Abuse–Evil?

Last updated on: December 9, 2019 at 9:06 am   by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Are Certain Substances–Such As Those We Abuse–Evil? 2019-12-09T09:06:17-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Timothy McMahan King is a Christian who suffered health problems that left him an opioid addict.  He eventually broke his dependence on drugs.  But he argues now that a bad theology that has been taken over into secular thinking–namely, the view that substances are themselves evil, as opposed to the way they are used–is making our substance abuse problem worse.

He has written an article for Religion & Politics entitled How Bad Theology Makes the Opioid Crisis Worse. I’m not sure what I think about all of this, but King offers a perspective that I hadn’t thought of before and maybe you can help me in the comments sort it through.  Here is his thesis:

Faith and spirituality have been important parts of the recovery stories of countless people. At the same time, there are beliefs that arise from my own American Protestant tradition that distort cultural and public policy views toward both addiction and drugs. The “demonization” of substances and the emphasis on complete abstinence from drugs or alcohol in recovery can hinder the most effective treatment methods, particularly for opioids. This ideology undergirds a “war on drugs” that has not only failed, but has also made our overdose crisis worse. As long as bad theology helps drive our drug policy, we will be held back from some of the most effective and life-saving ways of addressing addiction.

King begins by tracing Christian attitudes towards alcohol.  The Bible describes wine as a gift of God (Psalm 104:14) and yet condemns drunkenness (Ephesians 5:18).  Christianity followed that distinction through most of its history, locating sin in the disordered use of alcohol, rather than in alcohol itself.  King cites Augustine, who famously taught that sin has no “substance,” since everything that exists was created by God; rather, sin is a lack of substance, a failure to use reality in its fullness, as God intended.

But then, in the 19th century, the Temperance Movement, growing out of a strain of American Protestantism, launched a crusade against alcohol itself, treating the substance itself as intrinsically evil.  Rum was spoken of as a “demon,” to be battled by smashing up saloons and, eventually with Prohibition, by legally banning alcohol.

This mindset, King writes, has been carried over into the “war on drugs””

Cultural understandings of drugs often incorporated Christian language. Many substances became “demonized” over the years. Crack cocaine is another major example, argue sociologists Craig Reinarman and Harry Levine, editors of Crack in America: Demon Drugs and Social Justice. “This demonization invests the substances themselves with more power than they actually have,” they write. “Drugs, unlike viruses, are not active agents; they are inert substances. They do not jump out of their containers and into people’s bodies.” Still, talk about addiction often resembles the religious language of demon possession more than a scientific or medical understanding of addiction and how it functions. . . .

But as Augustine or Aquinas might have argued, these substances are not inherently evil, and they are not direct causes for moral degradation. The concern is in a person’s relationship to the substance and the real and potential consequence for their life and the lives of others. . . .

This belief in the “demonic” nature of certain substances has real world consequences. First, it underlies the myth that prohibition is the only solution. If we believe that certain substances are inherently evil, then prohibition is a logical solution. We need a “war on drugs” because they are the enemy. But, if we recognize that the primary moral concern should be the potential harm to oneself or others that excessive or habitual use might bring, then the primary moral issue at stake is not getting rid of all drugs but reducing the potential harm they might cause. We need to ground our discussion not in stark statements of inherent good or evil but in understanding that our relationship to a substance like an opioid can exist along a spectrum, from harmful to beneficial.

[Keep reading. . .]

Thus the impulse now is to ban opioids–which can have a positive medical use–and to put out of business their manufacturers, despite the “good” medicine they also make, rather than make them safer and less addictive.  Methadone and other “Medically Assisted Treatments” have been proven effective by switching addicts to less harmful drugs.  But many treatment programs do not allow this approach, since it leaves the addicts still taking drugs.  Only complete abstinence counts.

Let’s switch to an example that King does not go into.  Inhaling tobacco smoke is deadly.  When that fact was established, the tobacco industry could have been pressured into developing safer strains of the plant, perhaps using genetic technology to breed tobacco without carcinogens.  But instead we “went after the tobacco companies” and worked to get people to stop smoking entirely.

More lately, a new technology has arisen.  Yes, inhaling tobacco smoke is deadly, but inhaling water vapor is not.  “Electronic cigarettes” let users breathe in flavored and nicotine-infused water vapor.  “Vaping,” which has the nicotine that smokers crave without the more serious carcinogens, has helped lots of people give up cigarettes.  But as soon as e-cigarettes came out, there were people opposing them on principle, since they still counted as smoking.

Recently, vaping has had its health scares.  At least 42 deaths have been attributed to vaping, along with over 2,000 cases of lung injury.  Most of the deaths involved black-market THC, the psycho-active ingredient of marijuana, laced with toxic additives.  Researchers have identified Vitamin E acetate as the additive that is the likely culprit in the other health problems.  So should we require that vaping products be made safer?  Or heed the growing outcry to ban them altogether?

King thinks that total abstinence from a drug may not be necessary.  But surely a recovering alcoholic who “falls off the wagon” by taking a drink tends to lose his hard-won sobriety, or at least this is what Alcoholic Anonymous says, based on long experience.  It’s reasonable to think that the same thing would apply to other addictions, from cigarettes to heroin.

Also, the phenomenon of marijuana legalization would seem to go against King’s thesis, at least as it applies to contemporary Christianity.  No one seems to be demonizing marijuana today.  Christians are not mobilizing to any great extent against efforts to legalize “demon weed.”  I suspect that lots of Christians are taking advantage of medical marijuana.  (Those of you in states with legalized recreational marijuana, are Christians too making use of the magic herb?)

If anything, people are going to the opposite extreme, exalting marijuana and its non-intoxicating component CBD as panaceas, the cure-alls for every ill.  (I saw a display in our local pharmacy of CBD products, one of which promised “increased energy” and the other from the same company promising to “help you sleep.”  They both listed the exact same ingredients!)

Also, isn’t the only effect of some drugs, including marijuana, to induce the equivalent of “drunkenness”?  If so, that would seem to mean that, by Biblical standards, any use of the substance would be sinful, without necessarily implying that the substance itself is sinful.

King has written a book  exploring these issues, including his own struggle to break his dependence on drugs, entitled Addiction Nation:  What the Opioid Crisis Reveals about Us.

So what do you think about all of this?

 

 

Photo from Pxhere, CC0, Public Domain

crime

Culture

Ethics

Medicine

psychology

Religions

addiction

alcohol

drugs

Evil

legalized marijuana

opioids

substance abuse

tobacco

vaping

Previous Post



December 6, 2019

Bad Things Presidents Have Done

Next Post



December 10, 2019 Guilt and Politics

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"My favorite Veterans Day video ... "Pete Hegseth Group Yelled At By Sentinel For Laughing ..."

Tom Hering


What Human Beings Are For

"The period of non religion is rising. People who identify as Christian has dropped and ..."

Patrick Dennis


A Catholic Century or an Evangelical ..."

"“We might think that what you are here suggesting is that we minimize our contact ..."

1another


What Human Beings Are For

"But Paul is making clear that we shouldn’t give mere humans, particularly unbelievers, more power ..."

DakotaLutheran


What Human Beings Are For


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the occupation of Lydia, the first European convert in Acts?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Tentmaker Baker Seller of purple cloth Fisherwoman

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 11/9/26

Cranach

Family

Jobs That Do Not Involve Loving and Serving...

Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 11/2/26

Cranach

Family

A Catholic Century or an Evangelical Century?

Cranach

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Old York-- Part Two

It is not however the Shambles or the walls, that are the...

Book III, Chapter 1: The Wonderworker (Matt. 8:1-22)

Book III, Chapter 1: The Wonderworker We now pass into what I've...

Pope Leo Addresses Peru in Lima Theater

Pope Leo has returned to Peru!  After a brief greeting from Peru's...

Forging the Romantic and the Gothic

I am working on the idea of forgery in history, the creation...

Lights in the darkness

Diwali is getting Hannukah-ed, the "Seventh Generation" principle and John Rawls, and...

Of peer review and source checking at Interpreter

  Certain critics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube