Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

geneveith

Is It Bigoted Not to Date Someone Who Is Transgendered?

Last updated on: July 3, 2019 at 6:00 am   by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Is It Bigoted Not to Date Someone Who Is Transgendered? 2019-07-01T06:02:26-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Nearly 90% of individuals–including gays and lesbians–would not consider dating someone who is transgendered.  Is this because of bigotry against men who identify as women and women who identify as men?  Or do these findings reveal a weakness in the ideology of transgenderism?

Researchers Karen L. Blair and Rhea Ashley Hoskin published their findings in an article Transgender exclusion from the world of dating: Patterns of acceptance and rejection of hypothetical trans dating partners as a function of sexual and gender identity published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.  They asked nearly a thousand participants, in the words of the abstract, “to select all potential genders that they would consider dating if ever seeking a future romantic partner.”

The options provided included cisgender [identifying as their birth gender] men, cisgender women, trans men [born female but identifying as men], trans women [born male but identifying as women], and genderqueer [those rejecting the binary male/female distinction] individuals. Across a sample of heterosexual, lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and trans individuals, 87.5% indicated that they would not consider dating a trans person, with cisgender heterosexual men and women being most likely to exclude trans persons from their potential dating pool.

Among heterosexuals, only 3.1% would consider dating someone of their own sex who identify or surgically transitioned to the opposite sex.  Meaning that 96.9% would not.

Similarly, the overwhelming majority of gay men are uninterested in dating a woman who now identifies as a trans man.  Similarly, lesbians are uninterested in dating a man who now identifies as a trans woman.

The only groups that expressed a willingness to date those who are transgendered are other transgendered folks, the “queer” or “non-binary,” and bisexuals.  But of these sympathetic groups, only 55% would consider a trans person as a romantic partner.  So nearly half of trans people will not date another trans person!

Not only that, in the words of the study abstract,

Even among those willing to date trans persons, a pattern of masculine privileging and transfeminine exclusion appeared, such that participants were disproportionately willing to date trans men, but not trans women, even if doing so was counter to their self-identified sexual and gender identity (e.g., a lesbian dating a trans man but not a trans woman).

That is, a lesbian who is open to dating someone who is trans would consider dating a woman who identifies as a man, but not a man who identifies as a woman.  These lesbians are attracted to women, even if they look and act like men, suggesting that they are still women after all.

Is this just bigotry?  That’s what some are calling it.  Blair, a psychology professor at St. Francis Xavier University (a Catholic institution), wrote some reflections on her findings in Psychology Today.

What is the solution? Improving general knowledge and understanding concerning the diversity of gender identities and what each identity means may go a long way in increasing inclusion. Furthermore, increasing accurate media representations of trans and non-binary people, as well as finding ways to increase contact may also be promising, as other research has found that contact with, and additional knowledge about, transgender individuals can effectively reduce trans prejudice.

She think that such education and personal relationships will teach the 96.9%, the 87.5%, and the 45% will learn that transgendered men are really men and that transgendered women are really women and that people’s romantic feelings and sexual desires will change according to this information.

Blair also offers a parallel with inter-racial romances:

Just as sociologists have tracked acceptance of inter-racial relationships as a metric of overall societal acceptance of racial minorities, future fluctuations in the extent to which trans and non-binary individuals are included within the intimate world of dating may help to illuminate progress (or lack thereof) with respect to fully including trans and non-binary individuals within our society. After all, it is one thing to make space for diverse gender identities within our workplaces, schools, washrooms and public spaces, but it is another to fully include and accept gender diversity within our families and romantic relationships.

 But in inter-racial relationships, individuals were attracted to and fell in love with someone of another race.  At one time, this was not socially accepted, but now it (mostly) is.  The issue here is that people are not attracted to and are not falling in love with those who are transgendered.

You desire whom you desire.  You love whom you love.  A person cannot help that, even though such desires and love may need to be controlled.  This was the argument for accepting homosexuality.  You certainly can’t be compelled to be attracted to someone you are not attracted to.  Nor should you be guilted into feeling desire for someone you do not, in fact, desire.  So it isn’t bigoted to not feel romantically attracted to someone who is trans.

This study strikes me as a fatal blow to transgenderism.  If a man wants to be a woman and identifies or gets the surgery accordingly, if he/she is still perceived as a man sexually by those he would like to attract, what has been accomplished?  The “sex change” is just a matter of appearance, of dress-up.  It might be accepted culturally and legally (as in the current definition of “gender”), but sex has to do with nature, and nature always asserts itself and eventually wins out.

Image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay, Pixabay License

Nature

sex

sexual desire

transgendered

transgenderism

Previous Post



July 2, 2019

Academics Questioning "Rationality" & "Reason"

Next Post



July 4, 2019 American Birthday Blues

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Yes, the discussion seems to be about the cultural side-effects of religion instead of religion ..."

David N. Gray


A Catholic Century or an Evangelical ..."

"I take it as a given that he means faith in “Jesus” or at least, ..."

1another


A Catholic Century or an Evangelical ..."

"Unfortunately she is also defending Russell Brand, so perhaps she also remains a total wacko."

reg


Monday Miscellany, 11/9/26

"Never touches on "vibrant faith" in what. "Personally vibrant faith" without an in what means ..."

reg


A Catholic Century or an Evangelical ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Rabbi" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Teacher Messenger Scribe Priest

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 10/19/26

Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 10/12/26

Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 10/5/25

Cranach

Family

William Lane Craig's Proof of God's Existence

Cranach

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

What Human Beings Are For

The folks at the "Word by Word" blog asked me to address...

Old York-- Part One

This was a very important city, all the way back to before...

"Utah saw the biggest shift toward Democrats in...

  You can watch the newest installment of Becoming Brigham here:  "On...

When You Can’t Ease Their Pain: Finding Christ...

I’m writing this article from my phone as I sit in the...

The Promised Land Season 2 Coming as Show...

The faith-based workplace comedy “The Promised Land” is entering a new chapter....

A Word On the 2026 Catholic Voters' Shift...

Let's talk about American Catholics, and their role in the earth-shattering blue...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube