Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

geneveith

A Defense of Tariffs

Last updated on: May 27, 2019 at 6:00 am   by Gene Veith

0 Comments

A Defense of Tariffs 2019-05-26T07:16:26-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Most American conservatives today are committed to free market capitalism, which includes free trade and opposition to tariffs.  By that standard, Donald Trump, who advocates a protectionist economic policy and who is imposing steep tariffs in his trade war with China, is not a conservative.  But there is another conservative ideology, an historically older version, that employed tariffs as part of its nation-building agenda.

The “paleo-conservative” Pat Buchanan tells the tale.  From Patrick J. Buchanan, “Tariffs — The Taxes That Made America Great”:

A tariff may be described as a sales or consumption tax the consumer pays, but tariffs are also a discretionary and an optional tax.

If you choose not to purchase Chinese goods and instead buy comparable goods made in other nations or the USA, then you do not pay the tariff.

China loses the sale. This is why Beijing, which runs $350 billion to $400 billion in annual trade surpluses at our expense is howling loudest. Should Donald Trump impose that 25% tariff on all $500 billion in Chinese exports to the USA, it would cripple China’s economy. Factories seeking assured access to the U.S. market would flee in panic from the Middle Kingdom. . . .

A tariff is a tax, but its purpose is not just to raise revenue but to make a nation economically independent of others, and to bring its citizens to rely upon each other rather than foreign entities. . . .

Once a nation is hooked on the cheap goods that are the narcotic free trade provides, it is rarely able to break free. The loss of its economic independence is followed by the loss of its political independence, the loss of its greatness and, ultimately, the loss of its national identity.

Read the entire essay, which rehearses how the lawmakers of the American founding imposed tariffs on English goods in a successful effort to build American industry.  He gives other historical examples, going so far as to claim that all great economic powers used tariffs, and that “free trade is the policy of fading and failing powers, past their prime.”

So there is a conservative case to be made for tariffs.

Free market economics is, technically, “liberal” economics, from the Latin word for “free.”  Despite my joking here in Australia about their being “upside down” in calling their Conservative party the “Liberal Party,” actually, they are correct.  The “liberal” kind of conservatism–stressing free markets, limited government, and individual freedom–is the kind that is dominant in American politics too.  It has much to commend it, though its emphasis on liberty isn’t very effective in conserving culture against “progressive” changes such as the sexual revolution.

But reverting to a “mercantilist” economy would be disruptive to our current economy just as adopting a “socialist” economy would be (though not nearly so destructive).  It would no doubt be virtuous to break our addiction to the “narcotic” of “cheap goods.”  But that would mean a noticeable drop in our standard of living, and who among us today is so virtuous as to embrace that?

It would also be virtuous for Americans to “rely upon each other rather than foreign entities.”  But that would come at the cost of smaller markets and diminished prosperity for American companies, and would it really be virtuous to embrace that?

The United States of America is large enough and dynamic enough to develop a more self-sufficient economic system.  As it is, one can hardly buy American-made clothing or electronic gadgets, since they can more cheaply be manufactured elsewhere.  But tariffs could add so much to the price of the things we buy at Wal-Mart and Amazon.com that eventually American companies could rush into the void and start making them again.

But dismantling free trade is a two-way street.  The countries we impose them on respond by imposing them on our products.  American farmers and manufacturers sell their goods around the world.  A mercantilist economy, in which Americans “rely on each other” in their buying and selling would operate in a much-smaller market.  Caterpillar would sell far less earthmoving equipment if they could sell it only in America.  That would mean fewer jobs and less prosperity.

You can also make a moral case for free global markets.  American and other farmers have nearly eliminated famine and starvation in the world, thanks to their ability to provide cheap food in a global marketplace.  Poverty, both in the U.S. and around the globe, is mitigated thanks to those “cheap goods,” which raises the living standards of everyone.

To be sure, Trump’s tariffs against China are less a reversion to mercantilism than a tactic in a trade war.  The long-range purpose is to force China to lower its trade barriers and unfair practices.  The goal of Trump’s tariffs, ironically, is evidently free trade.  When one side has few trade barriers while the other side has lots of them, that is not free trade.

So the ideological issues are not as black-and-white as they might seem.  But it’s good to recall that conservatism does not necessarily have to mean a commitment to laissez-faire economics wherever it leads.  Also that conserving prosperity, conserving economic liberty, and conserving personal freedom are all important for conserving American culture.

 

Photo:  Port of Long Beach by Charles Csavossy [Public domain] via Wikimedia Commons

Economics

History

Conservatism

free market economics

free trade

Paleoconservatism

protectionist economics

tariffs

Previous Post



May 24, 2019

"What's a Lutheran?"

Next Post



May 28, 2019 Why America Won't Go Socialist

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg


Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering


Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg


Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg


Luther on Tools


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Jacob's first wife?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rachel Leah Rebekah Dinah

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Cranach

Family

Monday Miscellany, 9/28/26

Cranach

Family

As Fulton Sheen Is Beatified, Don't Forget Walter...

Cranach

Family

Denying Laity the Chalice--Again

Cranach

Family

The Caucuses in the Democratic Socialists of America

Cranach

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube