Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
A New Kind of Tax: Taking a Percent of Your Assets

A New Kind of Tax: Taking a Percent of Your Assets

Last updated on: January 30, 2019 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

A New Kind of Tax: Taking a Percent of Your Assets 2019-01-27T16:08:15-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We are used to the taxation of income, the amount of money that we bring in every year. We are used to sales taxes, a levy on what we spend. There are also property taxes on our houses and other real estate; excise taxes on particular purchases such as cars, fuel, and tobacco; and a host of registration and user fees. Some progressive Democrats are proposing a new kind of tax: taking a percentage of a person’s total assets.

Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) is proposing an annual tax on the net worth of the very wealthy. If they have assets of more than $50 million, they would have to pay 2% of everything they have over that amount. That would rise to 3% of every dollar the person owns over $1 billion.

The purpose is not just to raise money for the signature programs of progressives (Medicare for All, free college, guaranteed income, etc.) but to reduce inequality.

From a story on Warren’s proposal at Bloomberg:

Wealth taxes do more to relieve inequality than raising income taxes, according to Steve Wamhoff, the director of federal tax policy at the left-leaning Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. New York Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s has proposed raising the top income tax rate to 70 percent, sparking conversations within the Democratic party about how high income levies should go.

New research also indicates that raising marginal income rates wouldn’t do much to lessen inequality, because much of the wealth among the richest Americans stems from private business profit taxed at lower rates and appreciated assets that go untaxed until they’re sold.

“If you believe that inequality is a problem, you have to start thinking outside the box,” Wamhoff said. “We need to go beyond the ideas that are already on the table today.”

This “thinking outside the box” is evidently manifesting itself in competition between Warren and Ocasio-Cortez on who can dream up the most radical proposal to “soak the rich” by making them less rich.

In progressive circles, that some people have more wealth than others is a moral offense. In a piece criticizing the approach, Kevin D. Williams quotes progressives to this effect:

. . .As Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman argue in the case of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s proposal to radically increase income taxes, this is to be understood not as an economic question but as a moral one: It is simply morally obligatory to hurt wealthy people. “The point of high top marginal income tax rates is to constrain the immoderate, and especially unmerited, accumulation of riches,” they write. . . .

Saez and Zucman write hopefully of the prospect that high tax rates would make the class of people with larger incomes “largely disappear.” Representative Ocasio-Cortez declares it “immoral” that we have a “system that allows billionaires to exist.” Marshall Steinbaum, the research director of the progressive Roosevelt Institute, wrote: “It’s increasingly clear that having wealthy people around is a luxury our society can no longer afford.”

Williams goes on to relate this policy of confiscating the property of the wealthy to the actions of radical socialists through the ages, including Stalin’s “liquidation of the Kulaks,” the affluent, property-owning peasants. After all, these were the “bourgeoisie” who owned private property, the middle class that was the target of the communist revolution. Stalin simply took everything they owned and then killed them, about 5 million people.

Surely taking 2-3% of what Ocasio-Cortez calls the “tippy-top” income echelon wouldn’t go that far? Would it? If it is just restricted to the “tippy-top,” does that make it acceptable, or is it intrinsically unjust at any income level? Do you think that kind of tax, if instituted, would eventually be applied to those with lower incomes?

Photo by Paul Sableman via Flickr, Creative Commons License

progressive Democrats

socialist revolutions

taxes

taxing the rich

taxing total assets

Previous Post

January 29, 2019

Abortionists Strike Back

Next Post

January 31, 2019 The Anti-Christian School Story Came Out Differently Than Expected

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In the parable of the talents, what is rewarded?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Faithfulness Riches Patience Sincerity

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »