Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

geneveith

The Theology of Being “Pro-Choice”: Demanding the Attributes of God

Last updated on: September 24, 2018 at 6:00 am   by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Theology of Being “Pro-Choice”: Demanding the Attributes of God 2018-09-22T19:26:38-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

God is a different kind of being than what we are.  That should be obvious.  But some people today want to be God, to the point of demanding to have the attributes of God.   Those who are “pro-choice,” for example–that is, pro-abortion–are not content to “play God” by giving mothers the sovereign power to determine the life or death of their children.  They are actually insisting that they should have the same freedom that God has.

So observed the late Lutheran (ELCA!) theologian Robert Jenson.  Peter Leithart discusses insights from Jenson’s book Either/Or:  The Gospel or Neopaganism (1995).  In his post Pluralism, Fundamentalism, Abortion,Leithart writes:

Jenson highlights the astounding theological claim made by pro-choice advocates, and now enshrined in Supreme Court jurisprudence:

“Pro-life attempts to call their opponents pro-abortionists, as if being pro-abortion were worse than being pro-choice, are misguided. The decision whether or not to abort is indeed a choice uniquely important for the pregnant woman; and merely therefore it must, according to the devisers and defenders of present law, be in her individual sole discretion. That is the whole and singular argument and position, and no other considerations are allowed to count against its force. What is in fact at stake for those who demand a right to abort at will is the understanding and practice of individual choice itself as the ultimate value of life, superseding even justice and even justice in a lethal matter, if it comes to that.”

This reaches almost self-parody in Planned Parenhood v. Casey, in Kennedy’s famous mystical statement that liberty is “the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”

Jenson finds the language strangely familiar: Believers will “recognize this supposed liberty to define existence, meaning, the universe, and human life as the freedom these theologies ascribe uniquely to their God. It is in fact a freedom of which no one ever dreamed apart from the influence of these theologies. According to the Abrahamic religions, there is indeed one whose personhood is defined by such liberty — and only one” (32).

In short, “Jews and Christians and Muslims stipulate the difference be­tween God and what is not God by recognizing a particular mode of freedom in God and denying it to all else; the National Organi­zation for Women and its allies claim explicitly and precisely that freedom for themselves, and the court has now written that claim into our law. What is asserted by ‘pro-choice’ ideologists and the court is straightforwardly a theology, one of an explicitly anti-bib­lical sort” (32).

You can see this self-divination in other places as well.  For example, postmodernists claim that truth is a human “construction,” or, put another way, reality is a human creation.  They are “creationists,” except they consider themselves to be the creator, in the place of God.

Morality is also a human “construction,” whether of the culture–in which case it is an oppressive imposition of power–or of the self, in which case whatever the individual chooses is right for that person.  This is where “pro-choicers” get their ethical beliefs.  If a woman is not allowed to choose, that is evil, but whether a woman chooses to have the baby or abort him or her, that choice is right for her.  Put another way, the human will is intrinsically righteous.  Which is a characteristic of God’s will.

Can you think of other examples?

 

 

Illustration by geralt via Pixabay, CC0, Creative Commons

Ethics

Life Issues

Theology

attributes of God

pro-choice

Robert Jenson

self-divination

Previous Post



September 21, 2018

Are Adults Still Responsible for What They Did as Minors?

Next Post



September 25, 2018 The Middle Ages Were the Age of Reason; Ours Is the Age of Faith

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"While she worked for Trump she was a tool's tool!"

reg


Luther on Tools

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg


Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering


Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg


Luther on Tools


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which principle is behind "Turn the other cheek"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hit back harder Do not retaliate Start a fight Ignore injustice

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Cranach

Family

Luther on Tools

Cranach

Family

Gen Z Wants Evildoers to Be Punished, Not...

Cranach

Family

The Family Estrangement Epidemic

Cranach

Family

As Fulton Sheen Is Beatified, Don't Forget Walter...

Cranach

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Looking at the Largest Orthodox Cathedral on Earth

  There is often a considerable amount of anger and, shall we...

The Problem with False Prophets

Miller’s Station UMC| 10/18/26| Anchor Verse: Jeremiah 23: 1, 9-23   I...

Emotion in Early Christianity by Andrew Crislip

Andrew Crislip’s Emotion in Early Christianity examines an often overlooked dimension of...

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube