Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Vocation of a Spy

The Vocation of a Spy

Last updated on: May 14, 2018 at 10:55 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Vocation of a Spy 2018-05-14T10:55:25-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Normally, the leadership of important government agencies like the CIA goes to politicians, campaign allies, or career bureaucrats. This spoils system approach is not always bad, resulting in some effective leadership as well as some that is less effective. This time, though, the president has nominated to head the nation’s spy agency an actual spy.

Gina Haspel was not only a long-time CIA employee. She was a clandestine field officer, working undercover in the most dangerous places in the world, having fought in the Cold War against Communism and in the War on Terrorism, rising through the ranks to gain experience at every level of intelligence-gathering and analysis.

The CIA rank-and-file is overjoyed at the prospect of one of their own running the agency. Morale has been low, due to the decades-long politicization of the agency, with its pressure to tell government officials what they want to hear. A Gina Haspel administration could get the agency back on track with the professionalism that used to be its hallmark. She would be only the second operations agent to be promoted to the top spot, and she is being called the most qualified person ever to be nominated for CIA director.

The problem is. . . well, she is a spy. And as such she has had to carry out some unsavory missions. Specifically, she oversaw the interrogation of terrorists in secret locations using water-boarding, later classified as a means of torture.

So a number of senators are opposing her nomination, including not only Democrats but some Republicans such as John McCain and Rand Paul.

So how do we consider this?

First, Marc Thiessen tells of one of her exploits, with others still being classified:

It was one of the Clinton administration’s biggest counterterrorism successes. Just weeks after al-Qaeda terrorists trained by Iran blew up U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, Gina Haspel’s phone rang in the middle of the night. She was in her final weeks as station chief in what the CIA describes as an “exotic and tumultuous capital” in central Eurasia, and intelligence had just emerged that two senior al-Qaeda associates linked to the embassy bombings were on their way to the country where she was stationed.

Haspel swung into action, devising an operation to capture the terrorists. She worked around the clock, sleeping on the floor of her office, as agents tracked the terrorists to a local hotel, where the men were apprehended after a firefight. According to the CIA, “The successful operation not only led to the terrorists’ arrest and subsequent imprisonment, but to the seizure of computers that contained details of a terrorist plot.” For her efforts during the operation, which ultimately disrupted a terrorist cell, Haspel in 1999 received the George H.W. Bush Award for Excellence in Counterterrorism . . . .

We should be thrilled that the woman behind this major counterterrorism success has been nominated to become the first female director of the CIA — and only the second person ever to rise to the agency’s top post after spending her entire career in clandestine operations. But instead of being grateful that a seasoned, experienced intelligence operative has been chosen, Senate Democrats are threatening to kill her nomination.

This is insane. Gina Haspel is quite possibly the most qualified person ever nominated to lead the CIA. She has experience in virtually every agency discipline, from counterterrorism to counterintelligence and offensive intelligence operations — including personally recruiting spies and directing covert operations.

[Keep reading. . . ]

Now in those days soon after the 9/11 attacks when the CIA was waterboarding captured terrorists in an effort to identify their comrades and to thwart other plots, water-boarding was not classified as torture and was accepted as a legitimate interrogation technique. Later, authorities determined that it was, in fact, torture and that it may no longer be used.

Lots of CIA, military intelligence, and law enforcement operatives engaged in waterboarding when it was permitted. Should they all be disqualified from promotion or even holding their current positions? Normally, a person isn’t punished for doing something before it was made illegal. So is it fair to punish Agent Haspel now?

Thiessen in the column quoted above points out that John Brennan, who served as CIA director under President Obama, also was involved with these interrogation centers, but Democrats supported him. Why not Haspel? (Brennan had also worked for the CIA and was a presidential Counter Terrorism advisor.)

But let’s look at this controversy from the angle of vocation.

One implication of Luther’s doctrine of vocation is that some actions that are, in general, unlawful, may be lawful when they are authorized by one’s vocation. To take some everyday examples, sex within the vocation of marriage is a good work, though it is sinful outside of that vocation. Punishing someone else’s child is not your job, but if you have the office of a parent, it is.

We are not to kill. Rather, we should love our enemies. In his treatise Whether Soldiers, Too, Can Be Saved, Luther argues that being a soldier is a legitimate calling from God and a means of loving and serving one’s neighbor. He makes the case that a soldier under a Romans 13 chain of command may, “does not bear the sword in vain” (Romans 13:4). That is, the soldier, by virtue of his vocation, may kill his enemy.

This does not exempt the soldier from the moral law binding on all people. As a Christian, he is still enjoined to love his enemies, even though he may have to take their lives in battle, and there are other limits to his conduct and to that of the higher authorities to whom he is subject.

A spy too would seem to be among those who legitimately “bear the sword” under Romans 13.

Espionage involves not only overt actions such as waterboarding, but, even more commonly and essential to the task, deception, lying, pretending to be someone you are not, persuading others to commit acts of betrayal, and other morally-questionable actions.

Can such problematic actions be done under lawful authority and in love and service to one’s neighbor? Put another way, can a Christian be a spy? Must we consider “Whether Spies, Too, Can Be Saved”?

Then again, the only way anyone can be saved is by the forgiveness of sins. In this fallen world, we cannot escape our participation in the network of sin, and we all bear our responsibility for our evil actions. And even when we are forgiven through faith in Christ, He sends us back into the sinful world to love and serve our neighbors, in our vocations. And here we still must struggle, as the conflict between sin and grace continues in both the world we are trying to serve and also within ourselves.

Where should we come down on all of this?

How does this relate to the principle of the Nuremberg Trials that “just following orders” is no defense in the case of heinous crimes ordered by one’s superior? What would be the limits on what a spy–or soldier–should carry out?

If being a spy is intrinsically immoral, should we just not have a Central Intelligence Agency at all? If we do need such a thing, who could work in it without participating in its questionable activities?

Would you vote to confirm Gina Haspel?

Photo, Gina Haspel, by Central Intelligence Agency [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Central Intelligence Agency

Previous Post

May 11, 2018

"Now He Is Very Near": Luther on the Ascension

Next Post

May 15, 2018 How the Commandments Define Civil Society (and What This Means for Abortion)

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Turns out, she wasn’t the right tool for the job."

1another

Luther on Tools

"You may have just given me my next sermon opening line."

1another

Luther on Tools

"So Katie Zacharia lasted only a demiScaramucci as press secretary......"

reg

Luther on Tools

"Apropos to the post on Gen Z a couple days ago: "If you want the ..."

Steve Bauer

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Cast all your anxiety on him because he ____ for you.

Select your answer to see how you score.

Watches Cares Loves Provides

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »