Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Status and Belief

Status and Belief

Last updated on: April 17, 2018 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Status and Belief 2018-04-16T20:22:59-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Christians talk a great deal about reaching the culture and influencing the culture. But Christians often take a simplistic view of culture, neglecting the social dynamics of how culture works. So I appreciate my fellow Patheos blogger Dean Abbott, at The Road Home for bringing up the role of social class and social status. I want to say a little bit more about the topic.

Mr. Abbot has written a provocative post entitled “Engaging the Culture Doesn’t Work Because Christian Beliefs Are Low Status”. Here is a sample of his argument, followed by my own thoughts:

Evangelicals have failed to reckon with the fact that Christian belief is a mark of low status, and has been so for a long time. This has been the case at least since the Scopes trial and the unflattering media portrayals of traditional Christian believers that accompanied it.

In the middle of the 20th century, it was more difficult to see Christian belief as a marker of low status. After all, during that period America was still dominated by a form of Christianity as its civil religion. Some religious figures were widely admired, Billy Graham being the most obvious example. Millions of people still attended church.

But, even then, in elite circles, Christian belief was a mark of low status. In such places, traditional Christian belief was largely considered the province of the weak, the bourgeois, the misinformed, the gullible or the wicked. At the same time, Protestant liberalism dominated. This less stringent form of Christianity sought to relax the tension by accommodating traditional Christian belief to the worldview of America’s secular elite. Eventually, that project failed. . . .

The idea behind the “engaging the culture” movement was that, rather than withdrawing from the surrounding culture as their fundamentalist cousins did, evangelicals should go forth to meet it. The expected outcome of this going forth was a revival of Christian faith.

It sort of makes sense. If enough evangelicals,the idea was, could be trained to engage the surrounding culture, especially in the culture-making arenas of politics,education and the media, eventually these well-placed agents of change could turn things around.What this plan never took into account is the dynamics of social status. Evangelicals sought to engage the culture by being relevant, by creating works of art , by offering good arguments for their positions. None of these addressed the real problem: that Christian belief simply isn’t cool, and that very few people want to lower their social status by identifying publicly with it.

Many evangelicals sensed something was going on. They responded as though the problem were a matter of style rather than content. They created churches calculated to prove evangelicals could be as hip as anyone else. The result was churches that had rocking worship bands, superb lighting, a million cool programs and no cultural impact.

The only lasting success to come from this trend was to make the hip pastor in a goatee and skinny jeans a universal object of derision. When the elites see him, they aren’t impressed. Rather than seeing someone so cool they want to emulate him, they see desperation. They see a low-status guy craving their approval, and they are rightly repulsed.

This is just one example of how evangelicals misjudged the context in which they operate. They could not see that Christianity has fallen from its place of cultural dominance not because we haven’t had enough worldview seminars, cool clergy or “God’s Not Dead”-style movies. Christianity has become marginalized because Christian belief has become an obstacle to getting what most people want: social status and the privileges which accompany it.

These are powerful points, but there are a few complexities that need to be factored in.

First of all, the upper and middle classes, by income, tend to go to church. As we have been blogging about, the most unchurched social cohort is the “lower class,” particularly the white working class. And yet, Mr. Abbott is right that Christianity is a low-status marker with a particular group of high prestige people today.

Let me explain. In the Middle Ages and on through the 19th century today in Europe, the social pecking order was based on your family. The aristocrats with their hereditary land holdings were at the top; then there were the merchants and craftsmen of the middle class; then there were the peasants who supplied much of the labor. With the industrial revolution and the political ideology of equality in America and France, a new class system emerged based on wealth: at the top were the wealthy business owners; then the “bourgeois” small property owners; and then the “proletariat” who did much of the work.

But today, according to the “New Class theorists,” a new social class has arisen, existing alongside the others. Traditional economic classes made products that were tangible. The wealthy owned factories that manufactured steel beams, automobiles, and gasoline. The middle class sold groceries, fixed TVs, and bought real estate. The working class worked with their hands, running the machinery and moving the goods. The New Class, though, makes its living with information.

The New Class–the term came from a description of Soviet bureaucrats who exercised an inordinate amount of power under Communism–consists of “information technology workers,” academics, teachers, creatives, members of the “helping professions,” journalists, media professionals, and other traders in information.

Right now, members of the New Class hold the most prestige in our society. It isn’t a matter of economics. A journalist might not make all that much, but still be scornful of “the rich” and “middle class values.” The New Class also tends to look down its collective nose at the working class, stereotyped as “rednecks” or “white trash.”

Christianity is still socially acceptable among the old product-oriented classes–whether upper, middle, or lower–but it tends not to be socially acceptable among the New Class. So Mr. Abbot is right about that. Not that there aren’t Christians in the New Class, but they may experience conflicts if they put great store in being accepted by the “cool people” among their peers.

Of course, our complicated society is full of different social groups. Your status anxiety depends on what group you aspire to be accepted in. It is also possible not to care.

I do think more people have rejected the Christian faith not because of reasoned objections but because they sought acceptance in the faculty lounge or with elite members of their information-oriented profession or because they wanted to identify with their “cool” creative friends.

For more about the New Class, see Peter Berger, The Class Struggle in American Religion.

So how should Christians respond to their lack of social status in the New Class or in other social groups that you would like to belong to?

Think about your experience in middle school and high school. At the top of vicious adolescent hierarchy, there was the “popular” crowd. This was probably based not so much on how much money their parents made but on their good looks, athletic ability, and fashion sense.

You may have tried to be popular, to enter the in-crowd, but were probably humiliated for your trouble. So what did you do? You started hanging out with your own friends, social rejects though you all may have been, and together you made fun of the popular kids.

Christians should do the same.

Christians are supposed to be numbered with the despised and the looked-down-upon (1 Corinthians 1:28).

Illustration by geralt via Pixabay, CC0, Creative Commons

Culture

Social Science

Christianity and class

Previous Post

April 17, 2018

Getting Beyond Nostalgia for Reagan or for the New Deal

Next Post

April 18, 2018 Being Moral vs. Moralizing

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"While she worked for Trump she was a tool's tool!"

reg

Luther on Tools

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many books are in the New Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

30 21 27 13

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »