Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Why Christians Support Trump

Why Christians Support Trump

Last updated on: March 14, 2018 at 5:45 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Why Christians Support Trump 2018-03-14T01:04:01-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Michael Gerson, an evangelical Christian who was formerly George W. Bush’s speechwriter, has written a searing article published in The Atlantic. He asks the question, why is it that so many white evangelical Christians–4 out of 5, far more than voted for Ronald Reagan–support Donald Trump, even though he would seem to be the antithesis of everything Christians hold dear.

His article is worth reading, but it has provoked some equally interesting responses. I’ll link to those and add my own thoughts about issues that Gerson, in my opinion, is missing. Then I’d like to hear from you.

First, the article that is stirring up the controversy. From Michael Gerson, Trump and the Evangelical Temptation, The Atlantic:

Trump’s background and beliefs could hardly be more incompatible with traditional Christian models of life and leadership. Trump’s past political stances (he once supported the right to partial-birth abortion), his character (he has bragged about sexually assaulting women), and even his language (he introduced the words pussy and shithole into presidential discourse) would more naturally lead religious conservatives toward exorcism than alliance. This is a man who has cruelly publicized his infidelities, made disturbing sexual comments about his elder daughter, and boasted about the size of his penis on the debate stage. His lawyer reportedly arranged a $130,000 payment to a porn star to dissuade her from disclosing an alleged affair. Yet religious conservatives who once blanched at PG-13 public standards now yawn at such NC-17 maneuvers. We are a long way from The Book of Virtues.

Trump supporters tend to dismiss moral scruples about his behavior as squeamishness over the president’s “style.” But the problem is the distinctly non-Christian substance of his values. Trump’s unapologetic materialism—his equation of financial and social success with human achievement and worth—is a negation of Christian teaching. His tribalism and hatred for “the other” stand in direct opposition to Jesus’s radical ethic of neighbor love. Trump’s strength-worship and contempt for “losers” smack more of Nietzsche than of Christ. Blessed are the proud. Blessed are the ruthless. Blessed are the shameless. Blessed are those who hunger and thirst after fame.

[Keep reading. . .]

Gerson then traces the history of evangelical involvement in politics, which has often been positive, but has degenerated into little more than reactionary, fearful cultural resentment. One problem, he says, is that unlike Catholics, evangelicals don’t have a theological basis for social involvement that can guide their political action. (Catholics have “subsidiarity,” the authority of mediating social institutions, and the “consistent pro-life ethic” that relates opposition to abortion to opposition to war and capital punishment and support of immigrants and the poor.)

Gerson is especially hard-hitting with his assertion that evangelicals’ uncritical support for Trump has led to the discrediting of the Christian message. “Evangelical,” he says, quoting Tim Keller, has “become a synonymous for ‘hypocrite.'” The spectacle of prominent pastors and Christian leaders continually covering for Trump’s transgressions–including an adulterous affair with a porn star–have utterly destroyed their credibility and turned them into jokes.

The moral convictions of many evangelical leaders have become a function of their partisan identification. This is not mere gullibility; it is utter corruption. Blinded by political tribalism and hatred for their political opponents, these leaders can’t see how they are undermining the causes to which they once dedicated their lives. Little remains of a distinctly Christian public witness.

Now read the critiques of Gerson’s article.

My fellow Patheos blogger Scott McKnight has written What Gerson Got Seriously Wrong. He says that evangelical Christians do have a theology for social and political involvement. He cites specifically the work of the Dutch theologian and statesman Abraham Kuyper, which was popularized in the United States by Francis Schaeffer. He says that the Kuyperian approach encourages a transformative Christian influence in all spheres of life.

I would add that the influence of Kuyper–who founded a Christian political party in the Netherlands that for a time ruled the country–appears to be waning among the Christians who are supporting Trump. A Kuyperian perspective encourages Christians to exercise political power. Taken to an extreme, it can become “theonomy,” the theocratic project of trying to rule the secular world by God’s law. But this is the opposite of what we are seeing now.

Christians who support Trump so strongly have evidently given up on having a Christian ruler–which Trump is obviously not–and are no longer trying to function as a “moral majority” trying to control society in accord with Biblical principles. You would think that those worried about Christians trying to impose a theocracy would be heartened that they are rallying around Trump instead. They should give Christians credit for adopting a more secular and less moralistic approach in their political activism.

Kuyper’s “sphere sovereignty” is much like Roman Catholic “subsidiarity.” The Catholic social ethic allows Christians to seem some time on the conservative side (opposing abortion) and some time on the liberal side (opposing capital punishment), which keeps them from being pigeonholed politically, which is perhaps helpful for their witness to non-Christians. (Though equating the murder of children in the womb with the execution of murderers is a monumental case of false equivalence.) Kuyperians are more likely to be consistent conservatives, as evangelical political activists have tended to be.

On the other hand, Trump is far from a consistent conservative. Christian Trump supporters are also conservative on some issues (abortion, immigration) while liberal on others (tariffs, sexual permissiveness). You would think they deserve credit for this broader political perspective.

One of the pioneering Never Trumpers, David French, has written a column for National Review defending Christian Trump supporters from Gerson’s criticisms. He says that Christians really have been facing serious attacks on their religious liberty and their deepest values. They are right to defend themselves and their beliefs–especially their pro-life convictions–politically.

He says that if evangelical Trump voters are morally compromised, the same is true for voters who chose Hillary Clinton, whose own moral failings and pro-abortion policies would have been disastrous. French warns his fellow evangelicals, though, of swallowing all of Trumpism and from surrendering their moral convictions out of political loyalty. “Evangelicals had good reasons to vote for Trump,” says French; “they don’t have good reasons to join his tribe.”

Another factor in the Christian support for Trump, I would argue, is the populist phenomenon. Rank and file Christian laypeople, like other Americans, have become cynical about “the establishment” and wanted to elect someone whom that establishment did not control. Evangelicals have been frustrated that the Republicans they voted for, including fellow evangelical George W. Bush, did very little to promote their interests, including stemming the tide of abortion on demand. Trump, though, has come through for them in a way that previous Republicans have not.

The most important factor in Christians supporting Trump is the pro-life issue. For all of Trump’s vices, he has appointed pro-life judges, quit UN family planning programs, allowed pro-life exemptions to Obamacare, and supported defunding of Planned Parenthood (which Republicans in Congress continue to protect).

In the general giving-up on politics, conservative Christians continue to hold on to that one issue. Abortion is so evil, so monstrous, that they continue to fight it by any means necessary. For better or worse, this means an alliance with Trump.

What do you think?

If you are a conservative Christian supporting President Trump, why are you doing that?

How would you answer Gerson’s criticisms? Are his critics right? Are there other factors that they aren’t considering?

Photo, Donald Trump delivers remarks at Liberty University [with President Jerry Falwell, Jr.], by Shealah Craighead [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Church

Government

Politics

Christianity and politics

Christians for Trump

Previous Post

March 13, 2018

The Self and the Fear of Death

Next Post

March 14, 2018 Why The Protestant Bible Has Fewer Books than the Catholic Bible

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "The Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trials and to hold the unrighteous for punishment"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Peter James Jude

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »