Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Protestant Reformation & the Protestant Revolution

The Protestant Reformation & the Protestant Revolution

Last updated on: January 11, 2018 at 6:00 am by Gene Veith

0 Comments

The Protestant Reformation & the Protestant Revolution 2018-01-10T20:43:42-05:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday’s post on the Reformation of America, made me realize that the distinction between revolution and reformation applies also to the history of Protestantism. Luther’s “reformation” was about correcting the church by returning to its first principles. But then a “revolution” broke out, in which Christians overthrew one model of the church after another in favor of ever-new theologies and practices. To this day, the revolutionary approach prevails, with the impulse to cast out the old ways of “doing church” in favor of completely new approaches to worship, the Christian life, and church growth.

Five hundred years ago, Luther set about “reforming” a church that had become corrupt, legalistic, power-hungry, and culture bound. He did so by re-emphasizing the essential foundations of Christianity: The Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Son of God, who died and rose again to save sinners. And God’s Word, His revelation of His will, His actions, and His grace, communicated in human language.

Luther did not throw out the liturgy of the historic church. Rather, He reformed it around God’s Word. This meant not only removing elements that conflicted with Biblical teaching but also making the Word the centerpiece of the liturgy. Worship consisted of Bible readings, sermons, hymns, all in the vernacular language. Luther retained the elements and responses of the liturgy because they are nearly all direct quotations from the Word of God.

Luther reformed the sacramental system around the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The sacraments were not longer to be thought of as meritorious actions that human beings do. Rather, they are physical and effectual manifestations of Christ’s saving actions.

Luther’s other reforms were of a similar nature. Lutheran churches still looked and acted much like the church of Rome, at least externally, though the meaning and the theology had undergone a “reformation.”

Soon, though, many Protestants felt that “Luther didn’t go far enough.” They demanded a revolution. Anything associated with Roman Catholicism was to be eliminated and replaced with something brand new.

The church of Rome worshipped with a liturgy, so we will not. Catholics had crucifixes and made the sign of the Cross–as did Lutherans, since they testify to the Gospel of Jesus Christ–so we will not.

Catholics had a high view of the sacraments, as did Luther, so we will not. A new non-sacramental kind of Christianity was developed.

Once revolutions break out, they tend to repudiate their initial instigators as being insufficiently pure. Robespierre started the French Revolution’s reign of terror, but then himself was guillotined for being insufficiently radical. The Russians who overthrew the Tsar were themselves overthrown by the Bolsheviks. So Luther and Lutherans were dismissed for being “too Catholic,” and the floodgates were opened.

Some Christians began saying that the Anglicans didn’t go far enough. Then that Calvin didn’t go far enough.

Catholics held to the historic creeds–as did Lutherans, Anglicans, and Calvinists–so we will reject those too.

Eventually, some said that the Baptists didn’t go far enough, that they were insufficiently subjective. Besides, being a Baptist or a Wesleyan or a Pentecostalist, etc., are all denominations. We will reject denominations.

Now, in all fairness, it’s a legitimate question to ask regarding changes to the church, “how far is far enough?” And certainly the Christian faith creates a revolution in the heart of sinners, destroying the old and creating new life. So revolutions are not always bad. And most of these revolutionary Christian movements were reformist in that they continued to emphasize the Word of God and the Gospel, even though they understood them differently.

But it was only a matter of time before some Protestants, following this revolutionary spirit, also discarded the Word of God and the Gospel.

In Protestant seminaries and research centers, higher critics of the Bible began rejecting its authority. The Gospel of salvation for eternal life made possible by Christ gave way in mainline Protestant churches to the social gospel, creating a utopian heaven on earth by means of political activism.

The ultimate expression of revolutionary Protestantism was made by the liberal theologian Paul Tillich, with his “protestant principle.” In a review of Tillich’s book The Protestant Era, Irving Kristol summarizes it this way (my bolds):

The second clause [of Tillich’s theological statement] proclaims the “Protestant principle,” which in turn consists of the “religious obligation” and the “religious reservation.” The religious obligation is to work God’s will on earth, to establish justice and love in economic and social relations (Tillich is a devout socialist), and to hasten the day of messianic redemption. The religious reservation is to protest against any absolute claim to truth made in the name of a relative, historical reality—whether that reality be a totalitarian state, a religious institution, a dogmatic creed, or a social movement—and it is thus possible to be loyal to the Protestant principle without belonging to a Protestant, or any other church. There is an inevitable trend in human communities toward idolatry—the worship of certain institutions and beliefs as having absolute and unquestionable validity, as being at long last “the final word.” What the Protestant principle asserts is that the only absolute truth is this: man can never attain absolute truth—“the final word” is always with God and it comes as a judgment upon man. The Protestant era, Tillich says, is coming to an end with a thunderclap of moral and social collapse; but whatever the religious forms that the future will throw up, they too will be subordinate to the Protestant principle.

For Tillich as for other liberal Protestants, all doctrines, all truth claims, all theologies, are “idolatrous.” (They really do speak this way.) And that’s what it means to be Protestant, a revolution first against Rome and eventually against the Christian faith itself.

All that remains is to pursue social justice. Religious revolutionaries thus merge with social revolutionaries so that the two become indistinguishable.

Certainly, the various strains of evangelical and conservative Protestantism hold to a different religion than that of the liberal theologians.

But even conservative Christians today still tend to approach change in the church in terms of revolution rather than reformation.

Our worship services do not connect to contemporary Americans, we are told. So do we ask, how can we improve them? How can we convey God’s presence and His holiness more effectively to people today? That would be the Reformation approach, identifying what Christian worship is supposed to be, and then making changes accordingly. But the more common response today is “let’s find a new way to worship!” Throw out the hymns, the liturgies, and the ecclesiastical practices of centuries. Let’s come up with something completely different.

We see this pattern in other areas of church life–in pastoral care, discipleship, education, church government, social ministry, etc., etc.

Might we try identifying what the church has done in those areas in the past and why it did so and what were the underlying principles? And then revise our practices so that they bring out those first principles more effectively?

This would preserve the church, making today’s contemporary congregations continuous with the historic church, allowing new approaches to build on the accomplishments of the past, give inspiration and guidance to today’s methodologies, and prevent the church’s foundations–Christ Jesus crucified for sinners and the Word of God–from being obscured.

Illustration by LatheeshMahe (Own work) [CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Previous Post

January 11, 2018

The Osage Murders

Next Post

January 12, 2018 The Embarrassing Twitter Video on Censoring Conservatives

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I know wired earbuds are making a comeback (I never stopped using them as I ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"VCRs, tape decks, and cassette players are all having a revival among a segment of ..."

Tom Hering

Luther on Tools

"As a (retired) lawyer I see potential liability from sharing things like power or sharp ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

"I am not sure the items you mentioned, though disused, discontinued, discarded, could be considered ..."

reg

Luther on Tools

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did God place on Jeremiah’s mouth as a sign of his calling?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Burning coal His words A scroll A staff

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »