Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

geneveith

Happiness vs. Freedom?

Last updated on: April 15, 2016 at 6:00 am   by Gene Veith

0 Comments

Happiness vs. Freedom? 2016-04-14T22:38:16-04:00 Gene Veith

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In a description of his new book, The Intolerable God, author Christopher J. Insole tells about a central struggle in the philosopher Immanuel Kant:  the conflict between happiness and freedom.

Now this sounds strange to American ears.  Surely, freedom is essential to happiness.  But Kant relates the issue to God.  Here is how Insole describes Kant’s dilemma:

We need God if we are to hope for happiness, as Kant thinks we must. We also need freedom, in a strong sense, in order to be moral. God must withdraw for this freedom to be possible. But if God withdraws, happiness can no longer be attained.

Read about this after the jump.  How would you resolve this dilemma?  I offer some thoughts myself.

From Christopher J. Insole, Meet This Book: The Intolerable God – EerdWord

The central focus of this book is Kant’s lifelong concern with God, freedom, and happiness, from his earliest thought to his dying days. The book unpacks a central tension in Kant’s thought: we need God if we are to hope for happiness, as Kant thinks we must. We also need freedom, in a strong sense, in order to be moral. God must withdraw for this freedom to be possible. But if God withdraws, happiness can no longer be attained. I relate this drama to Kant’s theory of knowledge and his shifting views about what metaphysics can achieve.

The view of human freedom that Kant moves towards — and bequeaths to future generations — is one where to be free, we must be “protected” from divine action. This in turn determines Kant’s conception of happiness and autonomy. The picture that emerges is of a thinker who believes in God, and hopes for immortality, but who resists mystery, divine action, and revelation, and who, therefore, is unable to accept central claims of Christianity.

[Keep reading. . .]

How interesting that Kant associated freedom with morality, considering that today freedom is more often associated with immorality!  His point, of course, is that for a moral action to be significant, we must be free to choose whether or not to do it.  When we are forced to do something right, there is no moral credit for doing it.

But notice how this desire to be moral drives us away from God!

And however odd it might seem that moral freedom has to be in conflict with God, I have seen something like this argument in the New Atheists.

Contrast this with the way Luther handles both moral freedom and happiness.

Luther stressed the reality of sin, which takes away our freedom, so that our wills are in bondage.  When we wake up to this reality through the Law, we can know the Gospel, which reveals that salvation comes not through attaining moral perfection but through being forgiven for our moral imperfection.  Then comes “the freedom of the Christian,” a freedom from the Law that manifests itself in love for our neighbors.

Luther brackets “freedom” in Kant’s sense.  He also brackets “happiness” in Kant’s sense.  For Luther, religion does not necessarily make us happy; rather, we know God best through trial and suffering, guilt and repentance, just as He makes Himself known in His incarnation and His cross.  Though this gives way to the Resurrection and to our own eternal happiness.

I wonder if, in demolishing Kant’s assumptions, Luther ends up connecting freedom and happiness after all.

I also wonder if the dichotomy between these two in Kant shows up elsewhere in the German philosophical tradition, which has given us Hegel, Nietzsche, and Marx.  These thinkers, in turn, have provided the foundation for totalitarian governments, both Communist and Fascist, which take away their citizen’s freedoms in exchange for promises of  security, community, and prosperity; that is, happiness.

 

Ethics

Philosophy

Freedom

happiness

Immanuel Kant

Martin Luther

totalitarianism

Previous Post



April 15, 2016

Transparency vs. privacy

Next Post



April 15, 2016 Correction to the Battle of Princeton post

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Turns out, she wasn’t the right tool for the job."

1another


Luther on Tools

"You may have just given me my next sermon opening line."

1another


Luther on Tools

"So Katie Zacharia lasted only a demiScaramucci as press secretary......"

reg


Luther on Tools

"Apropos to the post on Gen Z a couple days ago: "If you want the ..."

Steve Bauer


Luther on Tools


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category America Apologetics Art baseball Bible Blog Christ Church crime Culture Economics Education Ethics Family Food Football Government History Holidays Holy Week Humor International Islam Language Law Life Issues Literature Media Medicine Movies Music Nature News Personal Philosophy Politics psychology Reformation Religions Sacraments Science sex Social Science Sports technology television terrorism Theology Uncategorized Vocation war

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which letter wraps up with the reminder, "Let everything be done decently and in order"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

1 Timothy Hebrews 1 Corinthians James

Books by This Author Books by Gene Veith

See All Titles »

Related posts from Cranach

Family

Gen Z Wants Evildoers to Be Punished, Not...

Cranach

Family

The Family Estrangement Epidemic

Cranach

Family

How the Integralists Are Like the Socialists

Cranach

Family

Woke 2.0

Cranach

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

Top Three Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism

  This is my initial transcript for the video, "THE 3 WORST...

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube