Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Rogue

Dracula: Doing The Wrong Thing For The Right Reason

Last updated on: February 18, 2015 at 9:00 am   by Jonathan Ryan

Dracula: Doing The Wrong Thing For The Right Reason 2015-02-17T13:06:38-06:00 Jonathan Ryan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

DraculaUntold

 

(Jonathan Ryan posting for new Rogue writer, Jen Schlameuss-Perry.)

I finally got to see Dracula Untold the other night. I’ve been wanting to see it since I saw the first trailer months before it was in the theaters. I thought it was pretty good—it included the proper history of Vlad and included some very interesting moral questions.

I’ve always been sympathetic to Dracula. Don’t get me wrong—vampires are the worst (besides European dragons—I don’t get all this Hollywood propaganda to make dragons attractive to kids. Train dragons? To do what? Steal your gold, burn you to death, eat you and then sit on your treasure with lust in his heart for eons?). But, the story of Vlad, imprisoned as a young boy and hardened into a vicious warrior is sad. It doesn’t require a lot of imagination to understand why he became so nuts later on; with all the impaling people and then inviting his buddies to dinner only to lock them in the room and murder them, and other crazy antics that eventually earn him the legend of being a blood-drinker.

This movie offered what I thought to be a neat link between the history and the legend. He gets home to Transylvania after fighting with the Turks and makes a life for himself. He’s got a lovely wife and son that he obviously loves very much and a kingdom that he feels honorably protective of. He’s faced with what seems to him an impossible conundrum—he has to make a tribute of 1000 boys (including his son) to the Turks—delivering them to the same fate that he was given up to. He doesn’t want to do that. Apparently, he promised his wife before they got married that this would never happen, and he promised his son. Plus, he knows what horrors would await these children that he is sworn to protect. He wants another way.

Unfortunately, though he does have a certain faith in God, he decides to go the demon route. He knows the story of the demon that makes people Vampires, and thinks this is a good solution to his problem. This is where the best part of the movie happens. Vlad goes into the Vampire’s cave, seeking to partake in his power. The Vampire asks him a very interesting question, “What kind of a man crawls into his own grave in search of hope?” Hey! I know someone who did that! But, when the guy I’m thinking of did it (Jesus), He was defeating all the evil in the world—not cooperating with it (which may be part of why it worked…just saying’). Vlad goes in placing his trust and his hope in something that is irrevocably evil. The demon warns him that he won’t succeed in his endeavor, but Vlad, having too much faith in himself, believes that he can resist the evil and that it can co-exist with the good in him.   He doesn’t seem to know the almost mathematical principle that good and evil can’t occupy the same space. And he thinks that the good end he seeks will justify the evil means he will use (spoiler—it doesn’t).

They also have an exchange about the meaning of his name. The demon says Dracula means “son of the devil” but Vlad thinks it means “son of the dragon” (same difference to me) which he understands to be indicative of his role as protector of his people. Maybe this just proves my point that dragons are evil. Either way, this “dragon” will become the demon that destroys his people, and ultimately that is the meaning his name will take on and remain throughout history.

And there’s another catch. Besides the whole vampire nastiness and the fact that he’s not going to accomplish his goal, sometime in the future, Vlad is going to be required to help this demon fight “the one who made [him] that way,” who must be Michael the Archangel, or God or something—it has to be the enemy of a demon, anyway.

Once he drinks the Vampire’s blood, freeing that dude from the demon and taking it into himself, a change starts occurring in him. He still desires to do good—his intentions are still honorable, but his will has been given over to something not of God which takes him on a gradual path away from God and anything good. The frightened people that he means to protect are thrown off their knees as he yells at them that, “Prayers will not defend these walls!” No—he won’t allow prayer to defend those walls—he has taken the entire burden of defending those walls on himself. And he’s not equipped to handle it—especially since he has given up the best ally he could have (God), and has taken on one who doesn’t have his interests at heart (the demon).

He necessarily isolates himself from people who could have helped him. He can’t be in the light with everyone else because it burns him. He can’t be near his wife because her blood is too tempting. He can’t be with his people because they are (rightly) terrified of the fact that he’s a vampire. And then, there’s that awkward moment when, as he has already lost almost everything he holds dear (his wife falls off a cliff, his people are, in large number, slaughtered), he isolates himself from his son by drinking his enemy’s blood right in front of him. And then he has to give his son to the monks because, oh yeah, he turned the remainder of his people into vampires to help destroy the Turks. The vampires all get burned up by the sun; leaving only Vlad behind.

Now, to be fair, he intended to be burned up, too but a Renfield prototype (or maybe we’ll find out in a future movie that this is Renfield) comes and gives him some blood to drink, which keeps him alive (as alive as a vampire can be). The movie ends with Dracula in modern times meeting up with a lady who looks just like his old wife, or maybe is her reincarnated—I couldn’t tell. But, it certainly left it open to a Bram Stokeresque sequal. I kinda hope Dracula is going to be called upon to fulfill his promise in the cave, but the good that was present in the beginning will prevail and he’ll get his soul back. That would be nice. Because ultimately he is a nice guy—a nice guy who did the wrong thing for the right reason.

Jen Schlameuss-Perry is a massive fan of sci-fi, cartoons and superheroes and loves to write about them in light of her Catholic tradition.  She currently works for a Catholic Church and practices martial arts, cares for her family and pets and writes in her spare time.  Check out some of Jen’s other stuff on her Facebook page or her website.

Uncategorized

choice

Dracula Untold

evil

good

morality

Previous Post



February 13, 2015

If God worked in Social Media

Next Post



February 24, 2015 A TREMOR IN THE FORCE - Part 1 of 5


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Alien Life ASMR Book Reviews Careers in Writing and Filmmaking Catholic Imagination Christmas miracles DC Trinity War Articles Ebola Faith Family Entertainment Fangirl Raves Filmmaking Geek Books Geek Comics Geek Culture Geek Entertainment Geek Gaming Geek Girl Geek Goes Catholic Geek Goes Catholic Geek Literature Geek Movies Geek Music Geek Sports Geek Tech Geek TV Ghost Bear Ramblings God's Not Dead Coverage Grace Unplugged Coverage Ham on Nye Coverage (Yeah, we went there) HWA Stuff Indie Artists Interviews Jonathan Ryan Book News Kardashians Lord of the Rings Mark Driscoll Movie Reviews Parenthood Pixie Perfect Salt Lake City Comic Con 2014 Social Issues Teen Author Boot Camp The Conjuring Coverage The Michigan Dog Man Adventures Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Romans say about those who are led by the Spirit of God?

Select your answer to see how you score.

They are the children of God (or sons of God) They will not sin They will have eternal life They are saved

Related posts from The Rogue

Entertainment

Mabel's Identity Crisis

The Rogue

Entertainment

A TREMOR IN THE FORCE - Episode 5...

The Rogue

Entertainment

Horror: A Natural Genre For Catholics

The Rogue

Entertainment

Duped By Davros

The Rogue

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religious Music & Entertainment

"Les Diabolique" and Transgression

  Alongside something like Arrival, Vertigo, or Charade, Les Diaboliques is a...

"The Plague Dogs" and Mortality

So, flashback to the late 70s, early 80s. Walt Disney Studios is...

Movies Are Our Modern Myths

With the recent and highly successful release of Christopher Nolan’s epic film,...

"L'avventura" and Human Weakness

Today's piece is going to be a little different for a few...

Writer's Block in Tough Times

I first want to apologize for not posting or writing anything.  I'm...

Jerome

I've engaged in the multi-year project of reading through the Church Fathers,...

view all Religious Music & Entertainment blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube