Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Gathering Nectar

Does Wealth Prove God’s Favor?

Last updated on: August 10, 2017 at 11:21 am   by Deepika Birks

Does Wealth Prove God’s Favor? 2017-08-10T11:21:28-04:00 Deepika Birks

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Celebrity gossip is an $8 billion a year industry. In a world of uncertainty, where all the news is scary —  the climate and wars and disease and mass shootings and people occasionally just disappearing into sinkholes without warning and all of the food available is bad in some way — it’s our cultural escapism to wonder which celebrity had what plastic surgery or who’s dating whom.

I’ve noticed a disturbing trend, though, in a cultural phenomenon that’s already disturbing. It goes like this:

Commenter A objects to something a celebrity does/says/stands for. Perhaps it’s tacky or immoral or vulgar or unintelligent.

Commenter B shuts down Commenter A with, “Well, Celebrity X has more money than you ever will so Celebrity X must be right!”

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAReally? Is this the logic being used? The person with more money must be in the right?

Years ago I heard a father say to his son, as they were trying to decide where to go on vacation, “It’s called the Golden Rule. He who has the gold makes the rules!”

Is this really what we’re calling the Golden Rule now? Apparently the current Congress and Supreme Court seem to think so, since they’ve been on a streak lately of siding with corporations instead of citizens. Actually, we barely qualify as citizens anymore, we’re “consumers.” And those with less money for conspicuous consumption get less of a voice.

Are the rich our betters? Should we accept their standards as obviously correct, the proof being their wealth?

The Puritans believed that a person couldn’t know if they were going to heaven but that wealth was a possible sign of God’s favor. This belief led to what’s been called the Protestant Work Ethic. Hinduism also sees wealth as a blessing from Lakshmi. Swami Vivekananda says:

A householder who does not struggle to get wealth is immoral.

He goes on to explain:

If he is lazy and content to lead an idle life, he is immoral, because upon him depend hundreds. If he gets riches, hundreds of others will be thereby supported.

I agree that work is our duty. Laziness isn’t condoned by any religion. But in our economy, hard work isn’t always rewarded with riches, nor is wealth always a sign of hard work. Some people work two low-paying jobs and can barely afford rent and food. Other people inherit wealth and their only “work” is whether they choose to invest or squander it.

Vivekananda also says:

It is the duty of the householder not to pay reverence to the wicked; because, if he reverences the wicked people of the world, he patronizes wickedness…

I can’t help but think we (at least occasionally) reverence the wicked. Don’t the villains get all the best clothes? Isn’t evil sexy now? Doesn’t everyone prefer Marvel’s Loki to Thor? And, sure, vampires do want to kill humans, but isn’t Eric Northman sooo sexy and weren’t those guys from the Fellowship of the Sun who wanted to kill the vampires the real bad guys?

If no one can criticize the Mileys or Jay-Zs or Kardashians because their wealth proves they’re rightness, what about the Koch Brothers? Doesn’t their ability to buy elections prove the correctness of their political ideas? What about the Walton family? If six of the ten richest Americans is a Walton, then does that mean no one can criticize them for paying their employees so little that they rely on government assistance for their survival?

Entertainers are at least earning their money in relatively harmless ways. Whatever you think of pictures of Kim Kardashian’s rear end, there are worse ways to create wealth. What about wealth that’s created by exploitation? Sex slavery? Blood diamonds? The conflict in Darfur, the end game of which is to remove people from land rich in oil? What about American companies who laid off American workers to move their companies to China, where they can not only pay almost nothing in wages, but they don’t even have to follow environmental guidelines? Does the fact that the Chinese workers handling toxic chemicals get cancer and die before they’re 25 prove that they’re inferior to the CEOs who insist on using benzene? Do they have no right to criticize their employers, who have more money than them?

In the Mahabharata, when Duryodhan is dying, he taunts the Pandavas, saying he’s had the better life than them. While he’s lived in a palace, they’ve hid in the forest. While they were subsisting on fruits and berries, he was feasting. He got to rule a kingdom at its height; they’re inheriting a kingdom that’s been decimated. So he dies knowing that he was in the right all along, since he’s been blessed with the richer life.

But…Duryodhan is the “bad guy” in the story. And while the characters are complex, and Duryodhan does have some strengths and the Pandavas definitely have some flaws, Yuddhisthir is the embodiment of dharma, and Duryodhan is the symbol of adharma. Can we trust his assessment that his wealth proves his superior virtue, or are we meant to understand that his opinion is wrong?

Does wealth prove moral superiority?

Theology

Hindu

Hinduism

Previous Post



November 17, 2014

Wholehearted Living: Five-Minute Reflections for Modern Moms

Next Post



November 23, 2014 "We're not trained to shoot people in the leg"


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Books Cultural Differences Food Holidays Issues in Hinduism Series Karma Movies Names of God News Ramayana Scripture Theology Yoga

Select a Month March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What mountain did Jesus ascend from into heaven?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mount Carmel Mount Sinai Mount of Olives Mount Zion

Related posts from Gathering Nectar

Hindu

Issues in Hinduism: Diversity

Gathering Nectar

Hindu

Puja in Plain English

Gathering Nectar

Hindu

Issues in Hinduism: Murtis

Gathering Nectar

Hindu

Will the real Divine Mother please stand up?

Gathering Nectar

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Hindu

Indian Hindu pilot’s valor in line of duty...

  There is a hoary maritime tradition that the captain of the...

Movie on Neem Karoli Baba’s life is a...

Neem Karoli Baba’s life (1900-1973) is associated with miracles he made in...

20 Questions to Ask Before an Interfaith Marriage,...

Four questions every interfaith couple should discuss before marriage: Conversion. Will either...

Avadhānam: The Art of Concentration and Intellectual Mastery

What is Avadhānam? In the summer of 2015, during a three-day Sanskrit...

Jesus in the Dharma: Where Christ Fits in...

Where Does Jesus Fit in Hinduism? That’s a question I get often...

Hormuz: A Shared Hindu and Zoroastrian Heritage

Every evening, somewhere in the world, a newsreader utters the words: "The...

view all Hindu blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube