Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Fumbling Toward Grace

Shocking and Disgusting?

Last updated on: October 26, 2010 at 11:59 am   by Sarah Babbs

Shocking and Disgusting? 2010-10-26T11:59:36-04:00 Sarah Babbs

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Sometimes I read CNN.com. I know, I know. But I need to see what’s going on out there. Today there’s this little blurb about a candidate who is airing campaign ads that show graphic pictures of aborted babies.

People are complaining because their children are seeing them. The station has its hands tied, because apparently there is a law that if a federal candidate wants to run an ad, it must be run in its entirety, no station may edit it. Now I don’t know anything about this candidate. At all. Other than the fact that Randall Terry is her campaign manager, which makes me cringe a little, because he is basically nuts.

Also, I’m not saying that I agree with airing images of dead babies on tv where children can see them. No more than I’d like to see images of dead Iraqi children, or victims of gang violence dead in the street on tv. It is my personal opinion (and nothing more) that showing images of aborted babies as a way of trying to make people pro-life is not a great idea. One reason for this is because I think that pro-lifers (who have very good intentions and lots of passion) are *using* these violent acts to prove their point. That little innocent child who was just ripped limb from limb from their mother’s body has already suffered enough and had their human dignity violated in the worst way. It seems to me to be disrespectful to that child to show his or her mangled body to the world, in order to make the point that abortion is wrong. Again, just my two cents.

That said, the most interesting part of the article is the part where they talk about the ads being taken down from YouTube, which gave the following reasoning for taking them down:

“This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube’s policy on shocking and disgusting content.”

Really? I am seriously very interested in this statement. Actually, I’m rather confused. I have a lot of questions. Maybe some of you can help me answer them.

If abortion is an acceptable thing, or at the very least morally neutral, and it must be, right, because it’s legal, and there are more than one million of them performed each year, then why is it bad to see pictures of what it is? Abortion is just a medical procedure right, like heart surgery? A fetus is just a clump of cells, the same way a heart is, right?

clump of cells that makes up a human heart:

clump of cells that makes up a fetus:

If I wanted to publish a video of heart surgery on YouTube, and then show everyone what the heart looked like both before and after the surgery, would that be “shocking and disgusting”? Would YouTube let me do it? I wanted to find out, so I looked up “heart surgery” on YouTube and I found this:

Yes, if you’ve got an hour to spare, you can watch a heart transplant, and even see both hearts!

So apparently, even though I think the sight of blood, and bodies cut open, and seeing the inside of a human body is gross and I’d be willing to bet there are many people out there who agree with me, it does not meet the standard for “shocking and disgusting” on YouTube. But showing images of an aborted fetus does. What’s the difference? They’re both clumps of cells right? Why is a bloody clump of cells that used to be a fetus any more “shocking and disgusting” than the clump of cells that made up the bad heart that was removed from the patient?

Unless of course…

Abortion is different. Unless a fetus isn’t just a clump of cells the same way a heart is. Unless abortion is not morally neutral. Unless the product of abortion, which is a dead person, is the exact opposite of the product of heart surgery, which is usually a living one. Unless the sight of an aborted baby *is* shocking and disgusting, because that’s what abortion itself is.

 

Culture

Previous Post



October 22, 2010

7 Quick Takes Friday - What I'm Reading Edition

Next Post



October 28, 2010 Pure Awesomeness


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 QT Beauty and Style Blogging Books Catholic Culture Family Funny Making House Poetry Social Justice The Children Uncategorized Various Women

Select a Month December 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 December 2017 November 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What character trait is praised in the Parable of the Good Samaritan?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Deceit Selfishness Pride Compassion

Related posts from Fumbling Toward Grace

Catholic

When Girls are Garbage

Fumbling Toward Grace

Catholic

Litany of NFP Saints

Fumbling Toward Grace

Catholic

Jordan Edwards: But the People Just Stood Around

Fumbling Toward Grace

Catholic

Riots are the Voice of the Unheard: Thoughts...

Fumbling Toward Grace

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube