Empty-handed and duped: the pro-life Democrat

Last updated on: March 23, 2010 at 9:43 am by Sarah Babbs

Empty-handed and duped: the pro-life Democrat 2010-03-23T09:43:57-04:00 Sarah Babbs

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have been a Democrat for as long as I can remember. I proudly registered as a Dem when I turned 18 so I could vote in the next primary election. I was an enthusiastic supporter of John Kerry in 2004. Then I became authentically pro-life, and it’s been an increasing struggle ever since. I joined Democrats for Life. I proudly wore their button at the March for Life in 2006.

It’s getting harder to name this identification with a straight face, and without wanting to add a disclaimer or two (or three). I’m a pro-life Democrat, but….

Naturally I felt so very proud when a small coalition of “pro-life” Democrats were sticking to their principles and demanding that the Hyde Amendment be maintained and conscience protections be included in the proposed health-care bill (which I mostly otherwise supported). Of special favor with me was Bart Stupak of Michigan. With Mr. Stupak and the coalition of 12 (or so) I finally felt hope that Pro-Life Democrat is possible. In talking with my husband, I compared Stupak with former PA Governor Bob Casey Sr., who was, to my mind, the definition of Pro-Life Democrat. Pro-life, then Democrat. The man who said, at Notre Dame (of all places) in 1995:

“It was sold to America, this idea [of legal abortion], as a kind of social cure, a resolution,” he said. “Instead, it has left us wounded and divided. We were promised it would broaden the circle of freedom. Instead, it has narrowed the circle of humanity. We were told the whole matter was settled and would soon pass from our minds. Twenty years later, it tears at our souls. And so, it is for me the bitterest of ironies that abortion on demand found refuge, found a home— and it pains me to say this — found a home in the national Democratic party. My party, the party of the weak, the party of the powerless.”

This is a man after my own heart. And I believed, nay I hoped, that Bart Stupak was made of the same mettle. And then Sunday. I don’t need to rehash all of it. You already know what happened. Here’s hoping the President doesn’t change his mind about the EO next week (but I won’t hold my breath). But until that time, what does it mean for those of us who call ourselves Pro-Life Democrats? Does Dan Lipinski (the Rep. from Illinois who alone of the coalition voted against the bill) become the rallying point? How long before the pressure of the party makes him cave too?

Kathryn Jean Lopez, though a Republican (I believe) nailed it on the head in her recent article when she said,

“Throughout the whole ordeal — both while Stupak was fighting and after he caved — I couldn’t get the late Pennsylvania governor Robert Casey out of my mind. He was pro-life, and he was a Democrat. And he didn’t actually have a home in the Democratic party. If you’re pro-life and you’re a Democrat, for decades now, you’ve found yourself empty-handed, duped, angry, or humiliated.”

When I examine my principles, I am most certainly not a Republican. I agree with *some* things the Republicans have to say. But no longer can I enthusiastically call myself a Democrat either. My own political journey aside, I identified with those adjectives – empty-handed, duped, angry, humiliated – to describe how I felt, not that the bill passed (as I had a feeling it would) but because Stupak and the rest (excepting Lupinski) caved.

To make a crude analogy, I felt how William Wallace in Braveheart felt when he realized that Robert the Bruce, who he counted on to be at his side in battle, was fighting with the opposition. I have learned my lesson: have faith that people can (and do) act with integrity, but know, deep in your bones, that the only one who never fails is Jesus Christ. I wonder if, during this dealings with his own party, Robert Casey Sr. might have said the same thing?

Catholic

Culture

Previous Post

March 21, 2010

When we finally will see…

Next Post

March 24, 2010 Resquiat In Pacem

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 QT Beauty and Style Blogging Books Catholic Culture Family Funny Making House Poetry Social Justice The Children Uncategorized Various Women

Select a Month December 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 December 2017 November 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz