Guest Post!

Last updated on: January 24, 2009 at 10:31 pm by Sarah Babbs

Guest Post! 2009-01-24T22:31:58-04:00 Sarah Babbs

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A guest post from Rena Black, a friend who is studying at Villanova, regarding the proposed “Freedom of Choice Act”.

FOCA: Freedom to Choose Abortion

To whom it may concern:

I am an academic, an independent voter, a feminist, and a Catholic. Catholics as a whole are not single-issue voters. Theologically, they cannot be, because Catholic social teaching stubbornly refuses to be pigeonholed into conventional political camps. I am not a stereotype, and, for the purposes of this letter, I will not make statements about whether abortion is morally acceptable or morally wrong. My purpose here is to outline the inconsistencies of the Freedom of Choice Act, and to suggest that passing such a policy would be to alienate and misrepresent the vast majority of American citizens, pro-life or pro-choice (my mother, for example, is an ardent pro-choicer who has told me many times before that she opposes state-funded abortions).

If taxpayer money is to be used to bolster freedom of choice, then there must be at least two options from which to choose. If money is made available to support the choice of abortion, then a choice for adoption should be supported by pre-natal and neo-natal care funds, as well as funds to offset the cost of the adoption process for both biological and adoptive parents. A choice to “keep” and rear the child should be supported by pre-natal, neo-natal, and childhood health care plans. When these possibilities are considered, abortion is clearly the most cost-effective choice for a government which is footing the bill. (Unfortunately, it is also the most lucrative for agencies like Planned Parenthood, which have little to no incentive to genuinely support the decision not to abort.)

To extend the ideal of choice, we must look at the abortion procedure itself. It is, in fact, an elective surgery—meaning, of course, that one has a choice whether or not to undergo the surgery. If taxpayer money is used to support this particular sort of elective surgery, it seems unfair that other sorts of elective surgery not be subsidized for those who cannot afford them. Plastic surgery is, by definition, elective, and the reason for choosing it is precisely the same as the reason for choosing abortion: quality of life. Once there is national support for government-funded plastic surgeries, then the selection of one elective procedure for such support will not seem so suspiciously exceptional.

Should someone chose the abortion option, it must be acknowledged that the problem does not, in fact, simply disappear. Groups such as Feminists for Life, Project Rachel, and Silent No More serve and speak out on behalf of women who have undergone abortions, and their membership includes many of the same. The psychological aftershocks of abortion can be profound, and often surface much later in a person’s life. Counseling and treatment for these consequences would not be within reach of many whose abortions were subsidized through FOCA, yet there is no provision for such follow-up care in sight.

The other ironic and frankly sickening aspect of the act is the provision for compelling medical professionals to perform abortions against their consciences. The Hippocratic oath begins, famously, “First, do no harm.” If these professionals are forced to perform a surgery which they believe violates that crucial first principle, what has happened to choice? Choice has been taken away from expert medical professionals in order to “ensure” choice for women in excruciatingly difficult circumstances. To these women and their communities, the government has made a bold statement:

“Not only is abortion permitted, it is mandatory for doctors to perform. Not only must doctors perform it, it is the option we, the government, like best. If you choose abortion, things will work out just fine for you, and we don’t have to worry one bit about your child’s healthcare, her education, or the stubborn poverty which likely played a part in your situation in the first place. Oh, and here’s the money for your abortion.”

How in the world can anyone expect a choice in such circumstances to be free?!

I have yet to meet someone who truly is “pro-abortion.” No one wants abortions to happen. But if choice really is the issue at hand, then FOCA is woefully inadequate and—at best—a well-intentioned failure. The Act comes perilously close to establishing a state-preferred “solution” to unexpected pregnancies. Tellingly, the “solution” FOCA supports is the cheapest and shortest-term approach to the problem. The reasons for abortion are deep and the consequences are long lasting; the suggestions of FOCA are shallow and short-sighted. If we must use taxpayer money to improve freedom of choice, then we should be addressing the root causes for abortion-suggestive situations, and providing a system of support which truly does allow the human conscience to make free and informed choices.

Thanks Rena!

Previous Post

January 23, 2009

5 quick-takes Friday

Next Post

January 26, 2009 Vintage

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 QT Beauty and Style Blogging Books Catholic Culture Family Funny Making House Poetry Social Justice The Children Uncategorized Various Women

Select a Month December 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 December 2017 November 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz