Are Affairs and “Skeletons in the Closet” Responsible for Obamacare? Um…

Last updated on: May 8, 2014 at 8:49 am by Nancy French

Are Affairs and “Skeletons in the Closet” Responsible for Obamacare? Um… 2014-05-08T08:49:35-05:00 Nancy French

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s not easy for politicians to be honest, especially when they’re hiding something.

Apparently, there’s a lot to cover up — from Bill Clinton’s cigar to Mark Sanford’s “Appalachian Trail” to Larry Craig’s “wide stance” to Barney Frank’s male prostitute to Eliot Spitzer’s prostitution ring to John Edwards’s videographer, to Anthony Weiner’s… um… inadvertent Tweet.

Could moral failings like these be responsible, at least in part, for the lack of a legal challenge from the legislative branch?

Ben Carson thinks so. Here’s his reasoning. If the so-called Affordable Care Act were a civilian contract, someone would be sued. That’s what happens if one party is found to have knowingly made false promises to close the deal. By the same terms, Obamacare qualifies as a “massive case of fraud… a bill that never would have been passed if it had been revealed that millions of people would lose the health insurance with which they were satisfied and that they might not be able to keep their doctors” as promised.

Why, then, hasn’t the legislative branch legally challenged it? Could it be that some lack the courage to speak out freely because they’re afraid of political repercussions or revelation of a past mistake? Carlson believes blackmail might be playing into this:

“Chicago-style politics” … is nothing more than a euphemism for political corruption, including bullying, blackmail, and bribery. …In an age when Big Brother is capable of watching everything we do, it is not hard to imagine a scenario in which large numbers of public servants are silenced or subdued by secretive threats.

In other words, it’s conceivable that some politicians might have done things that they’re afraid of seeing the light of day. After all, the list of politicians who have been publically shamed because of their private behavior is long indeed.

The American people have been speaking out against Obamacare. It’s hard to go to the pharmacy without people talking about their lack of coverage. Sadly, the people we’ve elected haven’t done anything to stop this abuse of power, rendering our Constitution’s checks and balances useless. Our unique government structure is supposed to keep one branch from “acquir[ing] too much power and run[ning] roughshod over the other branches and the will of the American people. Unfortunately,” Carson writes, “today we are witnessing a largely unchecked executive branch issuing decrees that circumvent Congress while facing only tepid resistance.”

So what do we do?

Carson recommends a solution so simple that it may seem ludicrous. What if everyone just admitted to the skeletons in their closet?

If it were all done in a short time span, the media would be overwhelmed, and the people would quickly understand the extent of the disgusting and dishonest practices infesting the highest levels of government.

There’s his solution: just be honest. It would definitely be ugly, but once the truth is known, the country can deal with it, hold people accountable, then get to the business of fixing what’s gone wrong without the hindrances of secrecy and fear.

“With so much at stake regarding our country’s future, I think now would be an excellent time to come clean,” Carson says. “I think the American people are just as forgiving today if people are willing to be honest.”

Carson has a lot of faith in the American people. So do I. However, I think Carson is wrong and here’s why. My faith doesn’t extend to our D.C. politicians. A one-time confession of all our politicians’ sins might do wonders for their souls, but it would not fix what’s broken.

I agree that “moral failings” contribute to our leaders’ sad unwillingness to fight Obamacare. But it’s less a “scandalous” type of moral failing than just a simple lack of courage and fortitude. Whether politicians have been faithful to their spouses is secondary to whether they’re being faithful to their constituents. That’s a far easier matter to settle. By refusing to confront this staggering government overreach, our political leaders are betraying us and leading our nation into further disarray.

Thankfully, political terms are not “ ’til death do us part.”

Read more on the Patheos Faith and Family Channel and follow Nancy on Twitter and Facebook!

Previous Post

May 7, 2014

SixSeeds, Gordon College, and Patricia Heaton Honor Mike Flaherty, "One of the Most Compelling Figures in Hollywood"

Next Post

May 9, 2014 The Shameful Racism of the Presbyterian Church (USA)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Christmas faith family ministry music Television Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz