My Pre-Debate, Post-Debate Assessment

Last updated on: October 3, 2012 at 3:35 pm by David French

My Pre-Debate, Post-Debate Assessment 2012-10-03T15:35:21-05:00 David French

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m not worried about tonight’s debate — not because I don’t understand the stakes or because I’m overconfident regarding Mitt’s performance, but because I feel like I already know what will happen. For those who can’t watch tonight or have to go to sleep early, here’s my pre-debte, post-debate assessment.

Mitt did well: The experience of twenty-plus primary debates served him well. He had a good case to make, made it well, and landed several serious blows on the President, including a one-liner or two that will have enduring life on YouTube. For those who’ve had their opinions colored primarily by Obama’s (and the Media’s) relentless demonization, they saw more than enough to reconsider. Mitt won the debate. Not by much, but he won.

Obama was eloquent on defense: Turns out that Obama doesn’t have to rely on a teleprompter — a lesson John McCain learned in 2008. The President didn’t do as well in 2012 in 2008, but primarily because he has an actual record to defend. His answers on Libya were incoherent. But few politicians are better at division and distraction than Barack Obama, and he certainly scored enough points to cheer his base.

There were too many questions on process and not enough on substance: The Middle East is on fire, our troops are dying at the hands of our supposed allies, the economy has slowed to a crawl, and we spent entirely too much time talking about speeches, alleged gaffes, and campaign minutiae.

The polls won’t change anytime soon: In a debate, the tie generally goes to the challenger, and this wasn’t a tie — Mitt did better. But will his edge show up in the polls? As Katrina Trinko reported in NRO, the media polls are likely to over-weight Democratic voters:

Republican pollsters John McLaughlin and Jim McLaughlin argue today that the skewed demographics of voters in most polls mean that Romney won’t pull ahead in swing states:

Tonight Mitt Romney could give the most effective debate performance since Ronald Reagan out debated President Carter, or even since Abraham Lincoln showed up Stephen Douglas, and Mitt Romney will still lose the post debate swing state polls. Why? Because the voter samples that the media pollsters will call are already stacked to favor Democrats over Republicans.

The election remains close: I think I’ll be saying this until election day.

How well will this pre-debate, post-debate assessment hold up? Check in after the debate, and we’ll grade my prediction.

Previous Post

October 3, 2012

Evangelicals, Mormons, and Orthodoxy: The Glossary!

Next Post

October 3, 2012 Obama the Glum, Romney the Commander

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Christmas faith family ministry music Television Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 March 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz