Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
What to Do When Your Conception of God Does Not Line Up with Reality

What to Do When Your Conception of God Does Not Line Up with Reality

Last updated on: November 14, 2023 at 5:00 am by Vance Morgan

0 Comments

What to Do When Your Conception of God Does Not Line Up with Reality 2023-11-13T15:59:21-04:00 Vance Morgan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last Thursday I posted my second recent essay revisiting the problem of evil, arguing that the most common and popular solutions to this thorny problem don’t ultimately work.

Why Traditional “Solutions” to the Problem of Evil Don’t Work

In this final essay on the problem of evil, I suggest some strategic changes that provide an entirely different angle on the issue than most traditional attempts employ.

The problem of evil arises when one assumes the omnipotence and omnibenevolence of God while also observing the evil and suffering that is rampant in our world. Traditional approaches start with the assumptions about God then seek to adjust the reality of our experience to those assumptions—approaches which either require us to ignore some of our experience or play the “mystery” card when things get tough. I suggest that the proper starting point is what we know—our own experience—rather than starting with assumptions about what we want God to be.

What we know about love and power from our human experience, for instance, reveals that they are incompatible. To the extent that one chooses to love, one also chooses to set power aside. If a theist seeks to piece together a tentative sketch of what is greater than us starting with what we experience on a daily basis, the theist will have to choose between divine love and divine power as possible starting points. There is undoubtedly evidence in relevant sacred texts for both possibilities, but one cannot have it both ways.

Not even God, I would argue. If one chooses to begin with the assumption of God’s love, as I do, one is already choosing to deny God’s omnipotence. After many years of spinning my wheels in the problem of evil rut, saddled as a person of faith from my youth with the traditional conception of God as all-powerful and all-loving, it was the work of the 20th century philosopher, theologian, social activist, and all-around iconoclast Simone Weil that provided me with the tools to escape the rut. Weil’s evocative claim that “the absence of God is the most marvelous testimony of perfect love” is a one sentence expression of her belief that if God created the world out of love and invites a response to that love, then by necessity God must step back from creation as God waits and hopes for a free and loving response from the creatures God created. God chooses, in other words, radical love at the expense of radical power.

I teach this aspect of Weil’s thought frequently to mostly Catholic juniors and seniors in an honors capstone seminar. The students invariably find the idea of a God who out of love chooses diminishment in power to be challenging, to say the least. Yet the evidence for such an interpretation is at the heart of the Christian narrative. God became human and lived a human life in humility and weakness; from within these parameters, parameters that define all of us, the world was changed forever.

In last Thursday’s essay I briefly mentioned a recent episode of the podcast “The Bible for Normal People” in which Pete Enns and Jared Byas conversed with theologian and philosopher Thomas Jay Oord about the problem of evil. Their conversation raised a number of interesting issues that are worth considering.

Episode 28: Thomas Jay Oord – The Problem of Evil (Part 2)

Thomas Jay Oord has coined a word—“amipotence”—to describe his own conception of a God who is wholly and completely love (and hence not omnipotent). From the podcast:

To use philosophical language, I think God is maximally powerful. But God’s power is always shaped by love. So if you want to talk about sovereign love, the word I’ve invented is amipotent, “ami” for love, “potent” for power. God’s power is the power of uncontrolling love.

I like this strategy a great deal, but Oord takes the implications of “amipotence” in a direction that I have not to this point considered fully. My own conviction has for some time been, influenced by Weil’s thought, that God chooses to reduce divine power in the interest of divine love, with the (unspoken) implication that God could, under certain circumstances, choose to use the divine power that has been set aside (as in the case of miracles, for instance) for reasons known only to God, just as a loving parent might choose to use their power and authority to override the free (but harmful) choices of a child.

Noting that he has “friends who think that God chooses voluntarily not to control at least most of the time, but could if God wanted to, and maybe occasionally does,” Oord says, “I have a God whose nature is love, and always loves, has to love and therefore can’t control anyone, or anything.” An amipotent God does not put omnipotence in its back pocket, ready to be pulled out on occasion when necessary. A amipotent God, one whose very nature is “uncontrolling love,” cannot set love aside for the sake of power. There is a huge difference between a being who chooses to love but might on occasion override love with power, and a being who essence is love and, accordingly, cannot control or manipulate—even for the best reasons.

Oord’s conception of God as amipotent fits well with what we have learned through science about our physical reality over the past century or so. At the foundation of our world is change and unpredictability, an open-endedness that belies our assumptions that at the core of things is stability and permanence. Although everything influences everything else, nothing controls anything. As Oord notes in the podcast, this has had a powerful effect on both philosophy and theology.

[This is] a way of looking at reality that says no one can control anybody else in the sense of being the only cause. And when I say no one, that includes God. Even God can’t control a worm. God can’t control you and me. God influences everyone and everything at every moment at all levels of complexity, but this God can’t control anyone or anything . . . Most of Christian theology has been written from a philosophical assumption that we call “substance philosophy,” which says, “Well, there’s some changes, but they’re not really changes to what’s at the core of what it is.” And process says, “No, we should start with change as we try to understand reality.”

As noted earlier, there is a big difference between believing that God chooses not to be powerful in the interest of love and saying that because God is essentially love, God cannot be powerful in a way that would violate love.

I have believed the former for some time now; I am not yet ready to commit to the latter, much stronger claim. This is not something that can be decided by going to the sacred texts—the Bible has extensive evidence to support belief in both an omnipotent and an omnibenevolent God. God both changes and does not change in scripture, sometimes in consecutive passages. The choice to believe in God’s existence is the beginning of choices, not the end. What God do I choose to believe in? What sort of God makes sense in the context of the world I experience daily? As Oord describes at the end of the podcast,

I think that’s something that a lot of people are hungering for, frankly. They want to hold on to this faith. But it can’t look the way it did. It has to have something else in the center of it. It can’t have coercion and control, and mental assent and heady theological frameworks, but has to have this relationality and this love at the center.

Previous Post

November 12, 2023

The Cost of Doing Evolutionary Business--God and Darwin have a conversation

Next Post

November 16, 2023 Is Confirmation Bias a Bad Thing?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Mary did have a choice. And she was able to make it before the Holy ..."

madalyn baumstark

Mary Got To Choose

"i cannot read beyond your recommendations for the books since i like to have a ..."

madalyn baumstark

A Doubting Faith

"AI will never be able to utter with honesty, feeling, or humility, the greeting: "Namaste".It ..."

madalyn baumstark

AI and Human Dignity

"They do. I'm sure you could find discussions of the same topic from any of ..."

Vance Morgan

AI and the Life of Faith

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Advent AI Angels Artificial intelligence atheism attention baptism Baptists beauty belief Benedictines Bible bicycling Big Bird books Bovina Camaldoli hermitage Canada Catholicism cats certainty change Christianity Christmas Collegeville Covid-19 creativity Development of Western Civilization dogs doubt Easter Enneagram Epiphany Episcopal ethics Eucharist evil extroverts Facebook faith family fear flowers forgiveness freedom friends God goodness grace happiness heaven hell history Holy Spirit Holy Week hope human nature humility humor idolatry incarnation introverts irreverence Islam Jeanne Jesus Joe Biden joy Judaism justice Kamala Harris knowledge Lent listen literature liturgy love Marsue Memorial Day miracles movies music mystery mythology NPR Old Testament optimism paradox peace Penguins philosophy piano podcast politics power prayer Protestantism Providence College Religion Rhode Island sabbatical sacrament science seeing silence Simone Weil Socrates soul sports St. John's College stories suffering tattoo teaching technology television theology thinking time tolerance transcendence travel trees trust truth Uncategorized Vermont wisdom wonder writing

Select a Month May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz