Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
AI and Agency

AI and Agency

Last updated on: May 20, 2026 at 6:00 am by Vance Morgan

0 Comments

AI and Agency 2026-05-18T13:20:17-04:00 Vance Morgan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

At the beginning of the month, I set the stage for my next several posts by engaging with a lecture by Notre Dame professor Meghan Sullivan on the topic “Ethics, AI, and Human Flourishing.” During that lecture she introduces a framework for thinking about AI in the context of Christian values and virtue ethics that goes by the acronym “DELTA,” as described in the following short video:

Last Sunday I focused on the fourth letter in the DELTA acronym: “T” is for Transcendence. Today’s letter: “A” is for Agency.

Agency places us squarely in the playground of freedom and responsibility. Not “freedom” in a political sense, nor “freedom” in the sense of being able to do whatever I want whenver I want without anyone stopping me, but something more basic and existential. When philosophers talk about human freedom, they are invariably referring to free choice. A quick definition: My choice to do “A” is free if among various alternative possible actions I choose to do “A”–but I could have done otherwise. A free action is the product of a free choice. I deliberated between the possibilities, weighed them in various sorts of ways, then chose–but no one or nothing forced me to.

Whether human beings actually have this power of free choice or whether we simply think we do has been a matter of debate amonst philosophers, scientists, theologians, psychologists, and anyone else who wanted to join in for centuries. I’ve written about the issue several times over the years in this blog–here’s a foray from three years ago:

What Freedom Amounts To

The issue of human free choice intersects directly with AI when we consider the other side of the free choice coin, the side we often choose to conveniently ignore–responsibility. Everyone likes the idea of choosing freely, but far less popular is the idea that if I choose freely, then the results of the action, for better or for worse, are my responsibility. If the action was truly up to me, then I cannot pretend or deny that I was not responsible for it. Our whole moral framework of reward and punishment, as well as our legal system of innocence and guilt, are built on this foundation.

Issues of responsibility frequently arose during the recently completed semester in my “We Can . . . But Should We?” colloquium. For example, we spent several classes investigating how AI is being integrated rapidly into defense and security operations. The use of “killer drones,” for instance, has become central in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Ukraine, vastly outnumbered in both manpower and equipment, has been able to not only defend itself but occasionally go on the offensive against a larger foe through drone warfare, often with drones cobbled together from spare parts taken from other sorts of technology. We know that drone warfare has made it possible for devastating strikes to be made against various enemies as buttons are pushed by decision makers thousands of miles away.

But what happens when AI systems and technology develop to the point where AI itself makes the choice of which targets to strike and with what sorts of deadly force? My students were convinced that AI does not and cannot choose freely as we believe human beings do, but it can generate actions for which we will want to be able to assign responsibility. In her talk, Meghan Sullivan asks the question my students were asking throughout the semester: Can AI be morally responsible for decisions that do not directly involve human beings?

If free choice and responsibility are inextricably linked, and if AI doesn’t “choose” in the sense that we believe human beings do, then the answer to the above question seems to be “no.” And that’s a big problem. Humans have a poor track record for taking individual and/or collective responsibility for things that go badly–AI undoubtedly is opening the doors wide to a future in which this will be much easier to do, while at the same time being very happy to take responsibility for things that turn out well.

Issues of responsibility in the world of AI are not, of course, limited to defense and security issues–they are pervasive in all parts of our daily lives. Perhaps a good place to start is to simply aske whether there are some decisions that only a human conscience should make. What are they? Can we build identifaible and agreed upon guardrails around AI that protect and preserve free choice and responsibility? These are conversations that cannot be avoided.

I close with this anecdote from a different class this semester. My teaching colleague was on point that morning, facilitating a discussion closely related to the above issues. Part of the conversation raised the question of whether AI can “think.” On the spur of the moment, I asked ChatGPT the following question: “Does God exist?” Within seconds, it answered

People have argued both sides for millennia, and there isn’t a definitive proof that convinces everyone. It comes down to which kinds of reasons you find most compelling,

Followed by multiple bullet points summarizing different arguments for and against that have been offered ovr the centuries, more or less the same quality as the proverbial student paper that starts with “Since the beginning of time . . .” No kidding–I’ve taught Philosophy of Religion before. My follow-up question was what particularly interested me: Do YOU think God exists?

I don’t have personal beliefs or a inner life, so I don’t “think” or believe in the way people do. I can outline perspectives and evidence, help you evaluate arguments, or simulate how different traditions or philosophers would respond. If you tell me what standard of evidence you care about—scientific, philosophical, or experiential—I’ll assess the case through that lens.

That was encouraging–no delusions of being a person (yet). Most interesting is AI’s admission that it doesn’t have an inner life. After five consecutive posts on the DELTA framework, that might be one of the most important connecting threads. The inner life is what distinguishes humans from everything else, including what we create. If there is anywhere that we reflect what is greater than us, that would be the place. Let’s not forget it.

Artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence

Previous Post

May 14, 2026

AI and Transcendence

Next Post

May 24, 2026 The Lonely Pawn: On Faith, Doubt, and Meaning

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Mary did have a choice. And she was able to make it before the Holy ..."

madalyn baumstark

Mary Got To Choose

"i cannot read beyond your recommendations for the books since i like to have a ..."

madalyn baumstark

A Doubting Faith

"AI will never be able to utter with honesty, feeling, or humility, the greeting: "Namaste".It ..."

madalyn baumstark

AI and Human Dignity

"They do. I'm sure you could find discussions of the same topic from any of ..."

Vance Morgan

AI and the Life of Faith

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion Advent AI Angels Artificial intelligence atheism attention baptism Baptists beauty belief Benedictines Bible bicycling Big Bird books Bovina Camaldoli hermitage Canada Catholicism cats certainty change Christianity Christmas Collegeville Covid-19 creativity Development of Western Civilization dogs doubt Easter Enneagram Epiphany Episcopal ethics Eucharist evil extroverts Facebook faith family fear flowers forgiveness freedom friends God goodness grace happiness heaven hell history Holy Spirit Holy Week hope human nature humility humor idolatry incarnation introverts irreverence Islam Jeanne Jesus Joe Biden joy Judaism justice Kamala Harris knowledge Lent listen literature liturgy love Marsue Memorial Day miracles movies music mystery mythology NPR Old Testament optimism paradox peace Penguins philosophy piano podcast politics power prayer Protestantism Providence College Religion Rhode Island sabbatical sacrament science seeing silence Simone Weil Socrates soul sports St. John's College stories suffering tattoo teaching technology television theology thinking time tolerance transcendence travel trees trust truth Uncategorized Vermont wisdom wonder writing

Select a Month May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz