Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Four Faces

Saul’s First Failure

Last updated on: October 9, 2018 at 6:15 pm   by Christopher D. Kou

Saul’s First Failure 2018-10-09T18:15:35-05:00 Christopher D. Kou

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Samuel blesses Saul, by Gustav Dore

In The Art of Biblical History, V. Philips Long employs an extended example of the rise of Saul to the kingship of Israel in 1 Samuel 10-13 to illustrate various issues and challenges to reading the Bible historically. Challenges to the historical character of the narrative include the 3-part means of accession to the kingship, which some writers take as an internal inconsistency, and secondly the apparent displacement of the Gibeah/Gilgal episode. When Samuel first anoints Saul he gives him a series of instructions and signs (1 Samuel 10:2-8):

  1. Saul is to go home by way of Rachel’s tomb, where he will meet men from his father, looking for him.
  2. Then he is to go to the oak of Tabor, where three men on their way to Bethel will meet him, with 3 goats, 3 loaves of bread, and a skin of wine.
  3. Then he is to go to Gibeath-elohim (Gibeah), where there is a garrison of Philistines. There, a company of prophets will meet him with musical instruments, and the Spirit of Yahweh will rush upon Saul.
  4. When these signs meet him he is to do “whatever his hand finds to do,” with the assurance that God is with him.
  5. Then he is to go to Gilgal to await 7 days for Samuel, who will offer ascensions and peace offerings.

These signs meet Saul just as Samuel said they would. Mostly. The last visit to Gilgal is dropped here from the narrative, and does not seem to factor into Saul’s accession. Many commentators note, however, the incident at Gilgal in 1 Samuel 13, where Saul offers ascension offering in Samuel’s place and is rebuked. This, they say, is a displaced narrative, evidence of a later redactor. After all, is Saul is supposed to do something at Gibeah (whatever his hand finds to do), or is he to go down to Gilgal? The two instructions on first blush seem to be at tension.

First, the 3-part accession of Saul’s anointing, his selection by the casting of lots, and his second confirmation after his defeat of the Ammonites. Some have seen these as conflicting roads to power, but Long shows that it is more likely a sort of 3-step program. The anointing is the designation, after which Saul is supposed prove himself in battle. This he does, but not in the way expected, when he takes the mantle of kingship to defend Israel from Ammon. Finally, he is confirmed after the battle.

What about the episode at Gibeah? Is it out of place? Long sees the key to the episode in Samuel’s significant noting that “there is a Philistine garrison there.” Why is this mentioned? At Gibeah, Saul is to meet the prophets and be filled with the Spirit, after which he is to “do whatever your hand finds to do, for God is with you.” Can it be anything other than the prophet heavily hinting that after Saul is filled with the Spirit of Yahweh that he is to go up in battle against the Philistine garrison? Long finds here the expected confirmation in battle for Saul.

But Saul shrinks back at the first from obeying the word of Samuel to set upon the Philistine garrison at Gibeah. Instead he returns to his father’s house and says nothing about his new calling. That is why Samuel is then forced to convene a special counsel at Mizpah and cast lots to declare Saul as the king that God has chosen for Israel. The Spirit does at length stir Saul to go against Ammon, and so there is a confirmation by battle.

The chaotic nature of Saul’s rise seems hinted at in Samuel’s words after the battle, “Come, let us go to Gilgal and there renew the kingdom.” Why does the kingdom need renewing? Because Saul’s accession has been stop and go, stop, go. He has been anointed and gone home, designated by lot and gone home, and finally has stepped into his role. The kingdom needs to be renewed because Saul has in the past twice relinquished the kingship. This is a redo, Samuel says, and finally the job is done.

But the issue of Gibeah still hangs like a loose thread.

That thread is not tied up until two chapters later after Saul has been king for two years. In 1 Samuel 13 Saul chooses 3,000 men and places 1,000 under the command of his son Jonathan, who is the one who defeats the Philistine garrison at Gibeah. When this happens, Saul blows the trumpet, and it is declared that Saul has finally defeated the garrison of Gibeah. He has finally (through his son) fulfilled the instructions of Samuel the prophet.

Saul now repairs to Gilgal and waits the appointed 7 days (1 Samuel 13:8) for the prophet to appear. It seems little wonder that Samuel is slow to come. Is he already disillusioned about Saul? Does he know it wasn’t Saul who personally took the garrison? Whatever the case, when he comes to Gilgal, it should be to finally confirm Saul’s kingship. Instead, Saul has taken action to confirm himself.

 

Biblical Studies

Samuel

Previous Post



September 18, 2018

On Books and Movies

Next Post



October 30, 2018 Angels of Death, Angels of Life (Part 1)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Ancient Near East Biblical Studies Biblical Theology Deuteronomy Divine Council Esther Eucharistic Theology Ezekiel Film General Genesis Joshua Literature Liturgy Luke Prophets Samuel Systematic Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2022 December 2021 June 2021 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did the Israelites eat in the wilderness?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Honey and milk Bread and fish Manna Grapes and figs

Related posts from Four Faces

Evangelical

Book Review: Themes and Transformations in Old Testament...

Four Faces

Evangelical

Witness or Die: Notes on the Book of...

Four Faces

Evangelical

Book Review: "Against the Gods" by John D....

Four Faces

Evangelical

Angels of Death, Angels of Life (Part 1)

Four Faces

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube