Trees are Trees – Thoughts on the Goodness of Creation

Last updated on: April 30, 2013 at 7:01 am by Alexei Laushkin

Trees are Trees – Thoughts on the Goodness of Creation 2013-04-30T07:01:01-05:00 Alexei Laushkin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

by R. Scott Rodin, MTh, PhD

An intersection in north Spokane was once surrounded by tall Ponderosa pines. I always loved arriving at this intersection. It gave me the feel of being on a forest service road deep in the woods. One day several large, yellow pieces of earth moving equipment arrived and over the following weeks diesel-belching machines managed to bulldoze and dispose of acres of forest. Not one tree was left. This once pine-laden piece of nature became the new home of yet another strip mall.

National Park Service Photo

I shared my disappointment and frustration with a fellow brother in Christ who shrugged off my concerns with the flippant comment, “those are just scrap pines anyway.” I had never heard that term before – scrap pines. It was clear to me however that by giving them this label my friend was able to excuse their destruction.

The idea that we can devalue an item in nature in order to justify our actions brings into question the biblical understanding of the goodness of creation. There are three views that are commonly offered as ways of understanding what God meant when he pronounced all of creation as “very good.”

The first, “human–centered” view states that because humanity is the crown of creation, the goodness of the created world lies solely in its usefulness for our happiness. This view is usually supported by three legs. The first is an interpretation of God’s command to the first couple to “rule over and subdue” as a license to exploit and dominate an earth whose sole purpose is to supply us with all of our needs and wants. The second is an eschatology that holds that the entire earth will ultimately be destroyed. Why then would we work to conserve and preserve that which God will burn up in his wrath at the second coming? The third is a Platonic view that believes that material things are inherently evil, and so our focus should be only on the individual, ‘spiritual’ soul. These three legs have provided a stool that has propped up a broad section of conservative Christianity with a justification to ignore the responsibility to care for creation.

R. Scott Rodin has been in not-for-profit leadership and consulting for over twenty-seven years. He is the President of Kingdom Life Publishing. He also serves as a Partner and Executive VP for Strategic Alliances for Artios Resource Partners and he is a Director and Principal of the consulting group of OneAccord NFP.

Reflections on God's Creation

Previous Post

April 30, 2013

How the Trinity Changed my Mind on Creation Care

Next Post

May 7, 2013 The Overlooked Children of Africa- Climate Disruption Tour Day 1

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Review Compassion for a World in Need Mercury and the Unborn Reflections on God's Creation The Christian Life The Public Square Uncategorized Worldview

Select a Month May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 January 2014 December 2013 September 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz