Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
Review: A Wrinkle in Time (dir. Ava DuVernay, 2018)

Review: A Wrinkle in Time (dir. Ava DuVernay, 2018)

Last updated on: March 9, 2018 at 11:39 am by Peter T. Chattaway

Review: A Wrinkle in Time (dir. Ava DuVernay, 2018) 2018-03-09T11:39:37-08:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the months leading up to the release of A Wrinkle in Time, the Disney studio made a token effort to reach out to Christian audiences, and, on the surface at least, it made sense: the film is based on a classic children’s sci-fi novel by the late Madeleine L’Engle, who often spoke at length about the way her works were informed by her Episcopalian faith.

It’s a little strange, then, to actually watch Ava DuVernay’s disappointingly clunky movie and to see how it expunges everything from the book that is specifically Christian.

For example, the three supernatural beings who guide the story’s protagonists on a journey around the cosmos are no longer guardian angels who sing God’s praises, but little more than generic fairy godmothers. The Bible quotations that motivated the action in the book are nowhere to be heard in the film. And when the supernatural beings rattle off a list of people who have made the world a better place, they no longer mention Jesus, though they do quote Buddha and they speak rather highly of Gandhi and Oskar Schindler.

It’s a little like making a Narnia movie in which Aslan is just another talking beast.

And that isn’t the movie’s only problem.

L’Engle’s book deals with some pretty abstract concepts, such as two-dimensional worlds and the cosmic embodiment of evil, which are great for teasing the imagination on the page but don’t translate so well to a visual, dramatic medium like film. And where the book encouraged a deeper form of cultural literacy, by quoting French and Greek philosophers and the like, the film frequently opts for quotes from rap artists and recent hit musicals.

The story concerns Meg Murry (Storm Reid) and her precociously smart kid brother Charles Wallace (Deric McCabe). Their father (Chris Pine) went missing a few years ago while working on a way to teleport to other places using just his mind, and now Meg’s classmates taunt her with the idea that her father just wanted to get away from her.

Then Meg and Charles Wallace get a series of visits from Mrs Whatsit (Reese Witherspoon), Mrs Who (Mindy Kaling) and Mrs Which (Oprah Winfrey, who first appears as a comically gigantic figure, taller than a house), three ancient beings who want to help Meg find — and, ultimately, rescue — her father, who is stranded on a planet held captive by evil.

What follows is a series of journeys to a variety of worlds, but instead of finding any sort of narrative flow between these scenes, DuVernay lurches from one setpiece to another in a way that lacks coherence and ultimately tries the audience’s patience.

It also doesn’t help that, while the visual effects frequently try to look rather epic, the story that strings them together is remarkably thin on characterization and world-building.

There are a few bright spots. Reid and Pine are particularly good in their roles, and once in a while the visual whimsy hits on something that works; I particularly liked the scene in which Meg seems to be walking up the blueprints for a set of invisible stairs.

Most importantly, the film doesn’t entirely lose the book’s emphasis on the power of love, which becomes an especially crucial point in the film’s climactic showdown.

But the film is also now full of bland, Oprah-esque messages about believing in yourself, being one with the universe, and having faith in who you are, which just feels very shallow — especially given how deeply rooted in the author’s faith the story used to be.

— A version of this review was first published in The Anglican Planet*.*

–

Here are a few other comments that I tweeted but couldn’t squeeze into the word-count:

In the book version of #AWrinkleinTime, Mrs Whatsit transforms into an angelic being and Calvin falls to his knees. "No," she replies. "Not to me, Calvin. Never to me." Nothing in the film even *tries* for that sort of solemnity or transcendence. Quite the opposite, really.

— Peter T Chattaway (@ptchat) March 8, 2018

#AWrinkleinTime gets me wondering: What was the first movie to show a human flying through the air with a (quasi-)supernatural being's help, only to fall and get caught before they hurt themselves? 1978's #Superman, perhaps?

— Peter T Chattaway (@ptchat) March 8, 2018

It's kind of alarming how much grey there is in #ChrisPine's beard in #AWrinkleinTime, given that he was playing Captain-Kirk-as-college-student just a few years ago. (Even the most recent #StarTrek film is set three years before the first of Shatner's episodes.)

— Peter T Chattaway (@ptchat) March 8, 2018

Previous Post

March 7, 2018

Newsbites: Jerusalem! Jesus Christ Superstar Live in Concert!

Next Post

March 9, 2018 Watch: The makers of Mary Magdalene talk about "taking people back to the core message of Jesus" in a new featurette

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which chapter of Genesis recounts the genealogy from Adam to Noah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Genesis 5 Genesis 2 Genesis 7 Genesis 10