Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
The first reviews of the “virtual reality” Jesus movie are here

The first reviews of the “virtual reality” Jesus movie are here

Last updated on: September 18, 2016 at 8:38 am by Peter T. Chattaway

The first reviews of the “virtual reality” Jesus movie are here 2016-09-18T08:38:42-07:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The first reviews of Jesus VR: The Story of Christ — the “virtual reality” movie being previewed in Venice this week — are here. And they’re not very positive.

Peter Bradshaw at The Guardian is fairly scathing:

The acting? Dire. The direction? Awful. The adaptation? Conservative and pedestrian. In conventional terms, everything about this new retelling of the Jesus story – showing here in Venice in an abbreviated 40-minute cut – is ropey. It is all too clearly influenced by Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ: the film has the same executive producer, Enzo Sisti and the same religious adviser, Fr William Fulco. But technologically it’s a different story. It’s the first feature film to be presented in complete wraparound 360-degree virtual reality. And it’s a startling, bizarre, often weirdly hilarious experience. With your bulky headset on – it began to overheat during the crucifixion scene, alarmingly – you have the urge to giggle. Not necessarily mocking. You just feel skittish. . . .

As the wise men presented their gifts to the baby Jesus during the nativity scene, I spin round to be confronted with a large, placidly chewing cow. During the John the Baptist scene, I tuned out to watch some people at the far edge of the water, busily and continuously doing – what? I couldn’t quite see. And during the sermon of the Good Samaritan I found myself watching two actors pretending to fix a cart at the edge of the crowd.

The film works reasonably well in the crucifixion scene, which is conceived on intimate terms with just a small gathering of centurions, believers, etc (though where were Mary and Mary Magdalene?) and there is a reasonably bold Christ’s-eye view shot. Very Mel. Weirdly, there are no close-ups of Jesus, who is kept in respectful medium- and long-shot. But unimportant villagers will get right up in your personal space.

Twelve years ago I wrote an entire essay on the use of point-of-view shots in Jesus films, so I am intrigued by the thought of a 360° point-of-view shot — where the viewer is put in the same position as Jesus but is free to move their head around and therefore decide which direction Jesus is looking. (If the point-of-view shot comes when Jesus is on the cross, do you see his legs and arms stretched out against the cross if you look down or to the side? Is the viewer free to turn around 180° and look at the wooden beams behind Jesus’ head? If so, then that would be weird.)

Anyway, David Sexton of the Evening Standard also isn’t very impressed:

What we were watching — the first ever screening of Jesus VR, a US-backed film due out in full at Christmas — was merely dire. Selected scenes from the Gospels were amateurishly acted out as if in a village Passion Play, all stripy robes and beards among stony ruins.

The whole you’re-really-there effect is provided by the fact that you can at whim look 360-degrees around and up and down. But why, when it is the story of Jesus, would you want to look anywhere but at him? And what an impudent, voyeuristic impulse to want to feel you were actually there anyway! And how inherently inartistic it is not to have what you see edited and composed for you by a film director!

Agence France Presse has a report, as well:

VENICE – Even having Jesus as its central character could not save a virtual reality biblical epic from the bile of slightly nauseous critics at the Venice film festival. . . .

Shot on location in Matera, the Italian village where Mel Gibson’s violent drama “Passion of the Christ” (2014) was filmed, the experience takes you through the defining moment’s of Christ’s life: his birth in a stable crib, his baptism, the last supper with his apostles and his death by crucifixion.

Except that the technology is still in the teething stages.

So rather than having the sense they are walking alongside Christ, the viewer’s perspective is that of being a spectator standing or sitting near the blandly-portrayed prophet.

“I was hoping you’d have a sense of Jesus as a kind of mystical apparition, something a bit more than a low-quality actor in a robe,” said one disappointed critic. . . .

With the quality of the images no higher than that of a magnified cell-phone screen, even Christ’s agonising death on the cross failed to engage the preview audience.

As it was, viewers found themselves distractedly wondering why they appeared to be sitting on the hut’s cooking fire as Jesus washed feet, or turning round to stare at the extras in case they did something.

“The technology is still in the early stages,” Barder admitted, though he defended the subject choice, saying the majority of people canvassed (in the US) had said Jesus’s life was the period they would most want to be able to visit.

If more reviews come out of the Venice film festival, I will add them to this post.

September 5 update: The Hollywood Reporter has its own story on the preview:

Many viewers reported issues throughout the screening with sound and picture quality, but alternative headsets were on hand to allow for swap-outs. Because the chairs were so close together, spectators often bumped into each other when spinning around, which awkwardly took them out of the VR experience and back into the screening room.

Interest was strong, as long lines out the door were seen at each screening as people on the Lido waited to get a taste of the technology. Reactions to the film in Venice were less than enthusiastic, however. . . .

The producers explained that because they shot in 360 degrees, many of the crew were hidden in plain sight, with everyone from the first [assistant director] to the sound guy wearing costumes. “We saved a lot of money on extras,” joked Sisti.

The Reporter also passes along this video of the screening room:

World's first VR film festival screening room in action. As isolating as you'd expect. #Venice2016 pic.twitter.com/I2aUwuEwhF

— Ariston Anderson (@Aristonla) September 1, 2016

September 7 update: Michael Phillips at the Chicago Tribune:

You’re essentially an invisible extra in the Jesus story, from manger birth to crucifixion death, alongside Second Shepherd on the right. In the manger scene, I swung around in my swivel chair and found myself mere inches from a wet-nosed cow.

There is virtually no cutting or camera movement. The images are blurry, as if you’re sitting too close to a 1966 Zenith TV console, the way I used to sit when “Batman” was on. “Jesus VR” may garner some interest among the VR-curious. But without a better, crisper image, filmmaking this rudimentary inspires three little words: not there yet.

During the break, the VR headsets came off for a cool-down and people asked a few questions. Someone wondered about the weirdness of the static visual quality combined with allegedly immersive technology. Director Hansen chewed his fingernails a bit, and then admitted they tried moving the camera now and then, or cutting within a pageant-like tableau, but it didn’t work.

“It took you out of the scene,” he said.

September 10 update: The Regina Leader-Post has a story on the film:

It’s not the Last Supper as the painting depicts.

Jesus Christ is kneeling on the floor, washing the feet of one of his disciples. A dozen other men are seated around the fire-lit room. You can look over at all of them, up at the ceiling and down into the fireplace.

It’s almost like being there, and that was David Hansen’s reason for making his virtual reality film, Jesus VR: The Story of Christ.

“In some ways, VR is as close to time travel as you could get. It really feels like you’re here, you’re looking around, you’re in that moment,” said Hansen, a Regina-based director/producer.

“I was thinking historically, if you could travel back anywhere in time, where would the majority of people want to go? … The No. 1 person they want to meet is Jesus Christ.”

Jesus VR, the first feature-length virtual reality film ever made, screened at the Venice Film Festival last week.

Being invited to one of the most prestigious film festivals in the world was “unbelievable,” said Hansen.

Hansen had the idea for the film last summer; he spent six weeks in Matera, Italy, making the film last fall. . . .

September 18 update: Robbie Collin at The Telegraph in the UK:

What exactly [virtual reality’s “Al Jolson moment”] might consist of remains unclear, though it seems unlikely Jesus VR will be it. For one thing, the technology isn’t quite there yet. Despite the image’s 4K resolution – in theory, as sharp as the best new HD televisions – the magnified pixels on the smartphone screen are clearly visible, which renders colours grubby and actors’ faces soggily indistinct.

Then there are what might be called the aesthetic pitfalls. Just as a rowing team is only as fast as its slowest member, a virtual reality film is only as plausible as its most saucer-eyed, cud-chewing extra, and Jesus VR boasts a menagerie of them.

In the Last Supper scene, I struggled to pay attention to Jesus’s words because I was so distracted by the disciples, who all seemed to be switching randomly between two facial expressions: beard-twirling solemnity and sea bass-mouthed astonishment. And during the crucifixion, I missed the nails going in because I spotted a jeering bystander who looked oddly like Jeremy Corbyn.

The fact the viewer’s eyes and mind can wander isn’t a flaw of virtual reality: it’s the point. But given the Life of Christ is a story in which the main character should be something of an attention magnet, you’d have to concede it’s less than ideal source material.

If more reviews come out of the Venice film festival, I will add them to this post.

Previous Post

September 2, 2016

Watch: A new faith-oriented featurette for Queen of Katwe

Next Post

September 3, 2016 Lost star Jeremy Davies to play Jesus in American Gods

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Paul’s profession before becoming an apostle?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Carpenter Tax Collector Tentmaker Fisherman