Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

filmchat

Of Kings and Prophets — season one, episode one

Last updated on: March 21, 2016 at 12:07 am   by Peter T. Chattaway

Of Kings and Prophets — season one, episode one 2016-03-21T00:07:03-07:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

ofkingsandprophets-saul-amalekites-2

Note: Last year I posted episode-by-episode notes on the sources and themes of A.D. The Bible Continues. I intend to do something similar for Of Kings and Prophets. Be warned: there will be spoilers here. And lots of appreciative nit-picking.

Season 1, Episode 1 — ‘Offerings of Blood’
I Samuel 13-17

Editing Samuel. The series skips past the stories about Samuel’s early life (I Samuel 1-7) and the role he played in making Saul king (I Samuel 8-12). It then cherry-picks bits and pieces from I Samuel 13-17 and rearranges the chronology somewhat.

The episode begins with Saul and his sons fighting the Philistines (I Samuel 13-14), and David waking up to discover that a lion has killed his sheep, which kicks off a plot thread that ends with David killing the lion (as per I Samuel 17:34-37). Then Samuel tells Saul to exterminate the Amalekites, which kicks off a plot thread that ends with Samuel killing the Amalekite king and telling Saul God has rejected him as king (I Samuel 15). Saul’s wife Ahinoam also suggests getting David to stay in the palace and play the harp for Saul (a loosely reworked version of I Samuel 16:14-23).

This episode introduces us to various members of Saul’s household: his wife Ahinoam, his sons Jonathan and Ishbaal, his daughters Merav and Michal, and his concubine Rizpah. Saul’s wife and children — including up to three sons (Ishvi, Abinadab and Malki-Shua) who are not depicted in this episode — are listed in I Samuel 14:49-50 and I Chronicles 8:33, though Ishbaal (a.k.a. Ish-Bosheth) is not mentioned in the books of Samuel until after Saul’s death (II Samuel 2-4). The concubine Rizpah is also not mentioned in the Bible until after Saul’s death (II Samuel 3:7), but she did bear him two sons who were killed when David was king (II Samuel 21:8-12).

This episode also introduces us to David and his kinsman Joab. In the Bible, Joab is David’s nephew, the son of David’s sister Zeruiah (I Chronicles 2:13-16). Here he seems to be more or less the same age as David — but that isn’t necessarily so odd, since David was the youngest of either seven (I Chronicles 2:15) or eight (cf. I Samuel 16:10-11) sons, and if Zeruiah was one of the older siblings in the family, she could have been bearing children by the time her youngest brother was born.

Ahinoam says Saul has been working for years to bring the tribe of Judah into the fold. In the Bible, Judah had already contributed soldiers to some of Saul’s campaigns (I Samuel 11:8), and they contributed soldiers to his attack on the Amalekites too (I Samuel 15:4), though it’s worth noting that the tribe of Judah is singled out in those passages as though the men of Judah were separate from “the men of Israel”.

Gath is identified here as the “capital of the Philistines” and the home of King Achish. The biblical Achish did indeed live in Gath (I Samuel 21:10), and Gath was one of the five main Philistine city-states (Joshua 13:3, I Samuel 6:17), though it’s not clear to me that any one of those cities ruled over the others. In the Bible, Gath was also one of three cities where the giants known as the Anakim still lived (Joshua 11:21-22) — and sure enough, this episode introduces Goliath, who was from Gath (I Samuel 17:4).

One extra note about Gath: The Bible seems to indicate that Gath was conquered by Samuel before the Israelites had a king (I Samuel 7:14). But the Bible also clearly states that Gath was a Philistine stronghold during King Saul’s reign; it was there that David lived when he fled Saul and sought sanctuary with Achish (I Samuel 27:1-4). So either the story of Gath’s defeat under Samuel is a bit exaggerated, or the Philistines recaptured the city. I suspect the series won’t get into any of that back-story.

The Philistines control the production and distribution of iron and forbid its use in Israel (I Samuel 13:19-21), but they do send iron to nations on the other side of Israel with the help of traders from Judah, which is not yet allied with Saul’s kingdom.

The Amalekites are portrayed here as a small-ish nomadic tribe whose caravan is attacked by Saul in the Negev desert. The biblical attack began at “the city of Amalek” (I Samuel 15:5) and continued “all the way from Havilah to Shur, near the eastern border of Egypt” (I Samuel 15:7), which is indeed in the Negev desert.

Samuel seems to go from Gilgal to the capital city of Gibeah to confront Saul and kill the Amalekite king, but in the Bible, Saul took the Amalekite king to Gilgal and Samuel killed him there (I Samuel 15:12-33). Gilgal was one of the four cities in which the biblical Samuel held court, but his home was in Ramah (cf. I Samuel 7:16-17).

Notably, the scene where Samuel disowns Saul does not include Samuel’s famous lines about the sound of sheep and cattle (I Samuel 15:14) or obedience being better than sacrifice (I Samuel 15:22-23). The Samuel of this series also doesn’t seem to “mourn” Saul’s disobedience the way the biblical Samuel did (cf. I Samuel 15:35).

Other scriptures. Although this series is based on the Old Testament rather than the New, an opening title card links the two by saying that the story takes place “1000 Years before Christ”, which is accurate, if approximate.

Saul says the Amalekites attacked the Israelites in Moses’ day “ten generations ago.” The attack is described in Exodus 17:8-16, and the biblical geneaologies indicate it may have been more recent than that. For example, the leader of the tribe of Judah in Moses’ day was Aaron’s brother-in-law Nahshon (Exodus 6:23, Numbers 2:3), and Nahshon was only five generations removed from David (Ruth 4:20-22).

Ahinoam says Moses called for punishment for the Amalekites when Israel was at rest from its enemies (Deuteronomy 25:17-19) — and right now Israel is not at rest.

Saul says the Israelites “are meant to be a light to the nations,” which is a concept that comes from the much later book of Isaiah (Isaiah 42:6, 49:6, 51:4, 60:3).

Samuel tells Saul that God “made you in his image.” In the ancient Near East, kings and even priests often said they were “images” of their gods, but Genesis 1:26-27 and 9:6 make the point that God created all of humanity in his image.

Fictitious elements. Saul tries to arrange a marriage for his older daughter Merav with a Judean trader named Mattiyahu. Mattiyahu is a fictitious character, but the biblical Saul did arrange marriages for both of his daughters.

Ahinoam mentions that Michal’s mother was a Cushite concubine of Saul’s. The biblical account gives us no reason to think that Michal was not Ahinoam’s daughter, but we do know that some ancient Israelites (such as Moses, as per Numbers 12:1) were married to Cushites, and that some Cushites went on to work for King David (II Samuel 18:21-32) and his successors as well (Jeremiah 38:7-13).

Geography. Ahinoam says the Philistines made it as far as Kadesh, and she says it exposes Israel’s weakness on its northern border. It’s not clear which city she’s referring to, but it would make more sense if she meant Kedesh in Galilee than Kadesh in Syria, which is where the battle scene from Exodus: Gods and Kings took place.

Gath is portrayed as a coastal city. Some Philistine cities were indeed located on the Mediterranean coast, but Gath appears to have been about 40km inland.

Mattiyahu is killed in Gath, and his body is found by Saul and his men being dragged behind a horse in the Nahal Arabah, a stretch of desert that runs along the Israel-Jordan border between the Dead Sea and the Gulf of Aqabah. Was the body dragged the whole way, two or three hundred kilometres from the Mediterranean coast?

Women. The female characters play much more prominent roles in this episode than they do in the Bible. Up until the final scene, when Saul walks in on him in the throne room, all of David’s dealings with the royal family are with Queen Ahinoam and her daughter Michal. Ahinoam has authority to forgive David’s family’s debt.

Also, it turns out Rizpah is not just a concubine — she’s a spy for the Philistines!

Sex and/or nudity. Mattiyahu and Merav have sex while their betrothal is not yet complete. Merav later bathes in a mikvah as a sort of pre-wedding ritual.

Rizpah appears to perform oral sex on Saul shortly before he attacks the Amalekites.

Joab teases David that there are easier ways to get women than by killing a lion.

Violence. Saul and his sons battle the Philistines at the beginning of the episode, and they slaughter the Amalekites — men, women and children — near the end. Samuel then beheads the Amalekite king in full view of the people.

David discovers that his sheep — including one whose head is almost completely severed from its body — have been killed by a lion. Blood drips from David’s hands. David sets out to kill the lion with his sling, and he ultimately succeeds.

People who can’t pay their taxes — which almost includes David — are flogged.

Mattiyahu is literally stabbed in the back — and through the chest — by Achish.

God talk. There is plenty of God talk between Samuel and Saul, but — surprisingly — there is none so far from David. Saul’s daughters are also prone to God talk: Merav tells Mattiyahu “only God could have arranged” their mutual passion, and it is Michal, rather than David, who says David killed the lion because the Lord was with him.

–

FilmChat recaps: one | two | three | four | five | six | seven | eight | nine

Bible Movies

Blog

achish

agag

ahinoam

amalekites

david

goliath

isaiah

ish-bosheth

joab

merab

michal

moses

nahshon

nephilim

of kings and prophets

philistines

rizpah

samuel

saul

zeruiah

Previous Post



March 11, 2016

Review: The Young Messiah (dir. Cyrus Nowrasteh, 2016)

Next Post



March 13, 2016 The Young Messiah: rounding up the other interviews


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said "as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Joshua Peter Abraham

Related posts from FilmChat

Entertainment

Joseph of Egypt – the Chosen spin-off announces...

FilmChat

Entertainment

Exclusive: A clip from Angel Studios' The King...

FilmChat

Entertainment

Exclusive: Watch a clip from Angel Studios' Brave...

FilmChat

Entertainment

Exclusive: Watch a clip from Angel Studios' Homestead

FilmChat

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religious Music & Entertainment

"Les Diabolique" and Transgression

  Alongside something like Arrival, Vertigo, or Charade, Les Diaboliques is a...

"The Plague Dogs" and Mortality

So, flashback to the late 70s, early 80s. Walt Disney Studios is...

Movies Are Our Modern Myths

With the recent and highly successful release of Christopher Nolan’s epic film,...

"L'avventura" and Human Weakness

Today's piece is going to be a little different for a few...

Writer's Block in Tough Times

I first want to apologize for not posting or writing anything.  I'm...

Jerome

I've engaged in the multi-year project of reading through the Church Fathers,...

view all Religious Music & Entertainment blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube