Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
Review: Happy-Go-Lucky (dir. Mike Leigh, 2008)

Review: Happy-Go-Lucky (dir. Mike Leigh, 2008)

Last updated on: February 20, 2013 at 11:23 am by Peter T. Chattaway

Review: Happy-Go-Lucky (dir. Mike Leigh, 2008) 2013-02-20T11:23:24-08:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Happiness is an elusive quality in a Mike Leigh film. Sometimes, in his films, you will meet characters who try to cheer other people up, but there is usually a darker side to their perkiness. The photographer who tries to get people to smile in Secrets and Lies is stressed out by conflicts within his family; the woman who provides illegal abortions in Vera Drake naively tells her clients they will all be “right as rain” after she has left, and is caught off-guard when one of them almost dies thanks to her efforts; and when Gilbert & Sullivan premiere their latest musical comedy in Topsy-Turvy, a depressed Gilbert responds to the applause by privately grumbling to his neglected wife, “There’s something inherently disappointing about success.”

So when you hear that Leigh’s newest film is about an irrepressibly upbeat woman who takes life’s woes in stride, you can hardly be blamed for wondering what the catch is. Will she have a dark side? Will she have a dark secret? Will her zest for life lead to tragedy? Surely, at some point, some shoe, somewhere, will drop.

But, well, no, that doesn’t happen, not quite, though Leigh certainly puts his newest, cheeriest protagonist to the test — starting with one of the very first scenes, in which Poppy (Sally Hawkins), after riding happily through London, parks her bike outside a bookstore and then returns to find that it has been stolen. Does she let this incident get her down? Not in the least; she simply shrugs and sighs that she never got to say goodbye. Later, she says that she could never replace the bike, almost as though it had been a pet, and so she takes driving lessons instead — and her instructor, Scott (Eddie Marsan), is a bitter, agitated sort of bloke who doesn’t respond well at all to the constant jokes that Poppy makes as he tries to focus her attention.

You have to sympathize with Scott on some level: Poppy, who is 30, can seem so flighty at times that you wonder how safe a driver she could ever really be. But their first driving lesson is hilarious, as Poppy giggles and teases, and Scott — seemingly the frustrated, no-nonsense voice of common sense — suddenly gives the rear-view mirror an exotic name and says it has something to do with fallen angels. Scott immediately defends his remark by saying it’s just a memory aide, and he does have a point: I haven’t forgotten his rear-view mirror either, since seeing this scene. But Poppy bounces back with an even funnier, and sillier, remark. And on it goes.

One of the first things we learn about Poppy is that she has friends, and they like to go to clubs and stay up all night laughing over the dumbest things. The morning after one such night, when her friends and her sister Suzy (Kate O’Flynn) have gone back to their homes, Poppy and her roommate Zoe (the delightfully deadpan Alexis Zegerman) start making animal masks out of paper bags. But it isn’t until later that you discover why they are doing this: both Poppy and Zoe are elementary school teachers, and this is one of the activities they have planned for their students.

The fact that Poppy teaches children, and the way Leigh lets this information unfold, raise some interesting questions about the relationship between happiness and maturity. Has Poppy grown up? Is her happiness a form of denial, part of a refusal to grow up and face the world as it is? Or is it a sign that she has grown up better than most, and kept a spirit of childlike wonder and empathy that others have lost?

The film quickly disabuses us of any notion that childhood, itself, is a time of perfect bliss — or that teachers like Poppy never need to be serious in dealing with their students. At one point, Poppy looks out the window and sees a boy bullying another boy. Will she merely watch, or will she intervene? Leigh keeps us in suspense by cutting from the school to one of Poppy’s driving lessons (where she speculates that Scott might be the way he is because he was bullied as a kid), and back again. But the gist of this scene, and others, is that there is more to Poppy than we might suspect at first. When she and her friends go to the pub and talk about the dangers their students face on the Internet, Poppy says certain things make her “angry,” and for just a moment, you can sense a sort of turmoil behind her happy façade.

Leigh puts Poppy in other situations, too, that cast an interesting light on the mix of joy and concern that she feels. In one scene, she visits her brittle kid sister Helen (Caroline Martin), who is married and pregnant and, it seems, gets along better with their parents; Helen also openly questions whether Poppy is really as happy as she seems. In another scene, Poppy comes across a homeless man (Stanley Townsend, who played Zechariah in The Nativity Story) who seems to be spouting gibberish, but she seems fascinated and keen to connect with him, just the same; when he says, over and over, “Know what I mean?”, she replies, calmly and thoughtfully, “Yeah, I do,” and there is not a hint of condescension in her voice.

Some bits in this film will seem very familiar to viewers of Leigh’s earlier films. The scene in which Helen shows off her suburban home, and another bit in which Poppy says she’s “ravishing” when what she means is “ravenous,” are lifted practically straight out of Secrets and Lies, though they are given different twists here. Also, in one scene, Scott goes into a rant that has something to do with the number 666, which sounds an awful lot like one of David Thewlis’s rants in Naked. It is said that Leigh gets his actors to develop their characters and improvise their scenes over the course of weeks, if not months, of workshops: the result is a series of essentially compassionate films that pay great attention to their characters, and encourage us to do the same. But at moments like these, you can’t help but think that Leigh has begun to repeat himself, kind of like latter-day Woody Allen.

Nevertheless, there is something infectious and unique about Poppy’s joy, and Leigh seems to have caught the bug. He peppers the film with comic, out-of-nowhere details, like the scene where one of Poppy’s colleagues practices a few dance steps in the school hallway. (When we meet the colleague’s flamenco teacher herself, she’s a show-stealer.) And when things turn serious, as they inevitably do, he lets Poppy reveal herself to be a person of surprising strength, courage and resolve. She can’t make everyone happy, but for many of us in the audience, she’ll do all right.

3.5 stars (out of 4)

–

Talk About It
Discussion starters

1. “It’s a lot of work, being a grown-up,” says Zoe. How do the characters in this film do that work? Do they avoid it in any way? Is Poppy’s constant perkiness a sign of her refusal to grow up? Or does it mean she has grown up better than others?

2. Why does the film include the sequence with Helen, Poppy’s married and pregnant sister? What does it say about maturity and growing up? Note how Helen refuses to let her husband use the PlayStation. How does this compare to the scenes in which Poppy and Zoe express concern over their students’ use of video games?

3. How do relationships change as people get older? How should they change? Poppy says she has lived with Zoe for ten years, but she also expresses interest in getting a boyfriend. How would, and should, one relationship affect the other? Do you want Poppy to stay with her best friend, or to find someone else? Explain.

4. Scott angrily tells Poppy that she thinks the world revolves around her. Is that a fair criticism? Why or why not? Why do you think he would see her that way?

5. Why does the film include the scene with the homeless man? Why do you think Poppy says, “Yeah, I do” when he keeps saying “Know what I mean?”?

The Family Corner
For parents to consider

Happy-Go-Lucky is rated R for language (about a dozen four-letter words and a couple of names taken in vain). It also includes a scene of a man and woman removing each other’s shirts before going to bed, and another scene in which several women joke about their cleavage and the things they use to pad out their bras. A man and a woman also get into a physical fight.

— A version of this review was first published at Christianity Today Movies.

Previous Post

October 10, 2008

Review: Billy: The Early Years (dir. Robby Benson, 2008)

Next Post

October 11, 2008 Billy: The Early Years -- the review's up!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who threw Daniel into the lion’s den?

Select your answer to see how you score.

King Nebuchadnezzar King Darius Pharaoh King Saul