The Love Guru — the review’s up!

Last updated on: June 20, 2008 at 12:38 pm by Peter T. Chattaway

The Love Guru — the review’s up! 2008-06-20T12:38:00-07:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My review of The Love Guru is now up at CT Movies.

One point I considered making in the review but didn’t, quite, is that, for all the raunchy humour on display, the film isn’t really as sexual as you might expect. This is not, in other words, The Guru of Sex, which was the original working title of the film starring Jimi Mistry, Heather Graham and Marisa Tomei that was eventually released simply as The Guru (2002). Instead of perpetuating the stereotype of the sensual South Asian, the “love guru” of Mike Myers’ film really does seem to be concerned with getting people to love themselves and each other, and not just to have sex with each other.

Indeed, the film’s obsession with penis jokes and the like is, in a strange way, almost pre-sexual. This becomes especially obvious if you compare and contrast this film with Adam Sandler’s You Don’t Mess with the Zohan, a film that I mention in my review of The Love Guru but for other reasons.

Both films share an obsession with male genitalia that tests the limits of what is acceptable in a PG-13 film — but for Sandler, it’s all about having sex with the ladies, whereas for Myers and his character, Guru Pitka, it’s all about teasing the guys for being “ball-gazers” and holding up penis-shaped food items and other gags that a prepubescent boy would still find naughty and funny even if he didn’t have a clue what sex was, only that adults find such topics embarrassing. Even the rooster jokes surrounding Jacques “Le Coq” Grande, the well-endowed Justin Timberlake character who has stolen a rival hockey player’s wife away, are played more for the naughty play on words than for any particularly sexual angle.

These may be differences that make no difference, especially to the family-minded readership of CT Movies. And that’s fine, I don’t mean to imply that one kind of dirty joke is necessarily better or worse than another.

But consider this: This may be the first movie Jessica Alba has made in a while in which she is not treated as a piece of eye candy who disrobes for the amusement and/or titillation of the male viewer — something that she has done in comedies like Good Luck Chuck (2007), dramas like Awake (2007), family-oriented (!) comic-book movies like Fantastic Four (2005-2007), and so on, and so on.

Turning to other matters: You can’t cover every angle in a review, but there is a particular line of critique in David Germain‘s review that is spot-on, and which I wish had occurred to me, too, in the few hours that I had to work on this review:

In “The Love Guru,” Mike Myers must come to love himself before he can love others. From the credits of this scattershot comedy sketch stretched and strained to movie length, Myers clearly loved himself to the point of narcissism going in.

Ouch. But true. Germain goes on to cite, among other things, the fact that Myers is listed four times in the acting credits — three times for playing the same character at different ages, and once for playing himself in a two-second cameo. I had noticed the odd detail of Myers being credited three times for the same character, but I hadn’t thought to tie it into the bigger question of narcissism — or, indeed, to tie the guru’s “you must love yourself” message to the bigger question of narcissism, especially the sort of narcissism that is all too common in the Hollywood celebrity culture that Guru Pitka thrives in.

Meanwhile, just to stay on top of some of the coverage that this film has had in the last few weeks: The Hollywood Reporter noted last month that Hindu groups were hoping to get this film banned in India because it “appears to be lampooning Hinduism”, but a couple weeks later, the Associated Press noted that Deepak Chopra, who has a cameo in the film, defended both the film and Mike Myers, saying that the latter has “the most profound understanding of Eastern wisdom, traditions and spirituality.” Whoa, Deepak, let’s not over-reach here. I mean, okay, maybe he does, but is there any evidence of that in the film?

Finally, the Globe and Mail, a newspaper based in Myers’ beloved Toronto, has a story on the influence of Bollywood movies, transmitted via late-night broadcasts on Toronto TV stations, on Myers’ sense of humour, as well as another story on how even some Canadian Hindus are offended by certain aspects of the film.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 20, 2008

She knows so many more words now.

Next Post

June 20, 2008 Defiance -- heroes? murderers? both?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What four things does the Pale Horse in Revelations bring upon the earth?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Silence, fire, blood, and pestilence Sword, famine, plague, and wild beasts Wrath, power, redemption, and judgment Storms, earthquakes, floods, and darkness