Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
Review: The Kite Runner (dir. Marc Forster, 2007)

Review: The Kite Runner (dir. Marc Forster, 2007)

Last updated on: August 9, 2014 at 10:17 am by Peter T. Chattaway

Review: The Kite Runner (dir. Marc Forster, 2007) 2014-08-09T10:17:44-07:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s probably safe to say you’ve never seen kite-flying scenes like the ones that form the emotional and metaphorical core of The Kite Runner. The film, based on the best-selling book by Khaled Hosseini, is partly set in Afghanistan in the 1970s, and the simple act of flying a kite comes to represent a freedom of spirit that is lost when the nation is invaded by the Soviets in 1979, and then remains lost when the nation is dominated by the extremist form of Islam that characterized the Taliban.

But the two boys at the heart of this story do not merely fly kites, they “cut” them — by chasing other kites through the air and curling around their strings until they snap. Kite-flying thus becomes a form of competition — and with the help of modern special effects, the film sometimes uses aerial shots to show how the airborne kites pursue one another, like fighter planes hot on each other’s tails.

These sequences are impressive, but their very impressiveness threatens to take you out of the movie. The aerial shots might be necessary, in some sense, since those who have never played these sorts of games would probably not know what to look for if the kites were shown from the distant, earthbound perspective of the boys themselves; but even so, given how naturalistic the rest of the film tends to be, the artificiality of the kite sequences does, unfortunately, call attention to itself.

And so it goes for the film as a whole. You can respect the efforts by screenwriter David Benioff (25th Hour) and director Marc Forster (Stranger Than Fiction) to honor Hosseini’s novel and tell a moving story about real people who just happen to be Muslims or Middle Easterners. And when you consider that the last time Benioff and Forster collaborated on a film, the result was the mind-numbingly contrived and far-too-clever-for-its-own-good Stay, you can definitely respect the fact that The Kite Runner relies on a cleaner, more straightforward kind of storytelling. Their intentions are clear, and they are good. It’s just the execution that doesn’t always work.

The only narrative gimmick this time is a conventional flashback structure. The film begins in San Francisco in 2000, as Amir (Khalid Abdalla, who played an intriguingly humanized terrorist in United 93) and his wife Soraya (Atossa Leoni) await the arrival of his first novel. No sooner has the book arrived, than Amir gets a call from an old family friend — a call that sends the movie back in time over 20 years.

The time is 1978, and the place is Kabul. The young Amir (Zekeria Ebrahimi) and his friend Hassan (Ahmad Khan Mahmidzada) are enjoying themselves as boys in many parts of the world generally do — flying kites, running through the streets, and chatting excitedly about their favorite Westerns and Steve McQueen movies. Amir is the son of an affluent widower named Baba (A Taste of Cherry‘s Homayoun Ershadi), and Hassan is the son of their servant Ali (Nabi Tanha). And while the two boys get along like brothers, there is still a hint of the class division between them, as Hassan expresses unfailing loyalty to Amir, and Amir promises not to abuse that trust.

Hassan is so loyal, in fact, that he defends Amir from the taunts of their playmates even when Amir will not defend himself, and Amir’s seeming weakness becomes a matter of concern for his father, who declares, “A boy who won’t stand up for himself becomes a man who won’t stand up for anything.” Because Hassan and his father are Shi’ite and Hazara, whereas most of their neighbors are Sunni and Pashtun, Hassan himself is also taunted by the local bullies — who ultimately rape him for his loyalty to Amir, in a scene that has understandably generated some controversy even though it is very discrete, relying on little more than impressionistic close-ups of loosened belts and the like to give the viewer a sense of what is happening.

Amir witnesses the rape, but from a distance — no one knows he is watching — and he never summons the courage to intervene. But the incident taints his friendship with Hassan, and ultimately impacts the relationship between their fathers, as well. And then the Soviets invade, so Baba and his son escape to the United States, leaving behind their lifestyle and most of their friends, at least for now.

If the early part of the film, in which an aspiring writer is haunted by questions of his own culpability after witnessing the rape of a childhood friend, is faintly reminiscent of Atonement, then the next section is more like The Namesake, as Amir and his father adjust to life in America while still following some of the traditions that they brought with them from their homeland. Amir grows up, goes to college, graduates, and falls in love with Soraya, the daughter of an old-fashioned and somewhat bigoted general (Qadir Farookh) — and their courtship, aided by Baba, is one of the movie’s more delicate and charming episodes.

Eventually, we come back to that phone call in San Francisco, and by the time that we do, a handful of story threads have been tied up fairly nicely. So you almost expect the movie to come to an end in the next few minutes. But instead, the phone call triggers an entirely new storyline in which Amir goes to Pakistan to visit his father’s old friend Rahim Kahn (The Nativity Story’s Shaun Toub), and Rahim reveals one or two things to Amir which prompt him to return to Afghanistan itself, a land now dead and lifeless compared to the thriving culture we saw there before.

There is a compelling movie in this somewhere, but the film as made lacks a certain momentum. The episodic nature of the story, compounded by the awkward use of the flashback device and the overall blandness of the direction, the photography, and even some of the performances, all tend to leave the viewer relatively unmoved. And that’s a problem, given how badly we need stories like this, stories that describe the Middle Eastern experience from a point of view that puts Muslims front-and-center and keeps Westerners more or less to the side.

The film has its merits, though, and the more I think about it, the more I admire its portrayal of Baba. Amir’s father has wealth, at first, but more importantly, he has principles and he is not afraid to risk his life to defend a complete stranger. And while he seems a little stern in the early scenes, when Amir is just a boy, he becomes a truly proud and loving dad as Amir grows to manhood. While he has his moral lapses, he is an inspiring figure, and it is not hard to see where the adult Amir gets his strength and courage as he confronts the bullies in Afghanistan once more. The world — not just that part of the world dominated by Islamic extremists, but the world as a whole — needs more men like Baba. So do the movies.

2.5 stars (out of 4)

–

Talk About It
Discussion starters

1. Early on, Baba says, “A boy who won’t stand up for himself becomes a man who won’t stand up for anything.” Do you agree? When is standing up for yourself a good thing? Is it ever wrong? How do you know what to stand up for? Is the Taliban standing up for something? What makes them different from Amir, or Baba?

2. How does the film treat Islam? Do you get the sense that Baba is religious in any way himself, or is he more secular? Note the scene where he says, “The mullahs want to rule our souls, and the Communists tell us we don’t have any.”

3. How do you react when you see the Taliban stoning someone to death? Does it affect how you read certain passages in the Bible? How do you relate Old Testament passages in which God orders the execution of certain people (e.g. Leviticus 24:10-23; Numbers 15:32-36) with New Testament passages in which Jesus tells people not to retaliate or to stone others (e.g. Matthew 5:38-42; John 8:1-11).

4. How would you respond if a friend were as loyal to you as Hassan is to Amir? How do you think you would you feel if you saw your friend being sexually assaulted and you did not intervene? How do you think you would deal with those feelings? Why does Amir tell Hassan to hit him? Why does Hassan hit himself instead?

5. What do you make of the courtship between Amir and Soraya? Is it a good idea to have the parents involved like that? What about the story she tells Amir, about her father’s reaction to a previous relationship? Did her father overreact? Did she?

6. What about the concern Soroya’s father shows over what the neighbors will think? Does it matter? How do things like family and culture ties encourage positive or moral behavior? How do they hinder it?

The Family Corner
For parents to consider

The Kite Runner is rated PG-13 for strong thematic material including the rape of a child (nothing explicit, mostly just close-ups of loosened belts, a child’s face on the ground, and things of that sort), violence (gun-toting Soviets and Taliban types, a woman is stoned to death, a child slingshots a man in the face in self-defense), and brief strong language (an f-word and one or two other, more mild words). Most of the characters are Muslim, and one of them is seen worshipping in a mosque.

— A version of this review was first published at Christianity Today Movies.

Previous Post

December 13, 2007

Clash of the Titans gets a director -- ugh.

Next Post

December 14, 2007 The Kite Runner -- the review's up!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. I am unstable in all my ways. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A sinner A hypocrite An unbeliever A doubter