Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
Review: Elizabeth: The Golden Age (dir. Shekhar Kapur, 2007)

Review: Elizabeth: The Golden Age (dir. Shekhar Kapur, 2007)

Last updated on: May 7, 2015 at 8:55 pm by Peter T. Chattaway

Review: Elizabeth: The Golden Age (dir. Shekhar Kapur, 2007) 2015-05-07T20:55:16-07:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

On the face of it, you might think Elizabeth: The Golden Age would not have to deal with the same sorts of problems that plague other sequels. While the creators of fictitious franchises have to walk a fine line between recycling their earlier movies and offering something new, the Elizabeth movies are supposed to be based on history, and you might think that each film, by focusing on a different part of the reign of the original Queen Elizabeth, would be somewhat unique. But alas, that is not how it turns out. Yes, The Golden Age has a sea battle and one or two other new bits, thanks to its presumably bigger budget. But for the most part, it plays like a pale retread of the film that earned Cate Blanchett her first Oscar nomination nine years ago.

Once again, Elizabeth is beset by suitors and advisors who tell her that she needs to marry and produce an heir if she is to secure the throne; however, since the film begins in 1585, when Elizabeth was 52 years old, it is doubtful whether it would even be possible for her to have a child. (Blanchett is 38, but she plays the character — who worries about the toll that time is taking on her body — as though she were older.) So when the suitors do show up — some of them sending only their portraits, which Elizabeth studies with a magnifying glass — they are played for laughs. The sense of urgency that marked Elizabeth’s courtships in the earlier film is gone.

And once again, Elizabeth has to deal with conspirators and would-be assassins — all of them Catholic, some of them Spanish, and one of them a woman with ties to the Scottish and the French. But for some reason the conspiracies are less interesting this time, too. Perhaps it is because Mary Stuart (Samantha Morton), the Queen of Scots, is holed up in a castle almost every time we see her, with little or nothing to do except write self-incriminating letters. Perhaps it is because Rhys Ifans, as a psycho killer known only as “the Jesuit,” is already beginning to seem like a typecast cliché when he is cast in these sorts of roles (in his last film, Hannibal Rising, he introduced the young Hannibal Lecter to the fine art of cannibalism).

Or perhaps the villains seem so tepid now because the forces loyal to Elizabeth have also been watered down. Chief among these is Sir Francis Walsingham (Geoffrey Rush), the spymaster who was introduced in the earlier film as a murderous, agnostic and sexually ambiguous figure who enjoyed manipulating the political scene behind Elizabeth’s back, but who is now portrayed as a quasi-sympathetic family man who, on one occasion, is slapped by Elizabeth and thus put back in his place. Yes, he still tortures conspirators, but he doesn’t relish it the way he used to.

Part of the twisted genius of the earlier film was the way it treated the royal families as rival gangs, almost rival mafia families, right down to a climactic montage that was pretty much ripped off from The Godfather. But the new film isn’t interested in making Elizabeth’s men look as “bad” as their opponents. Instead, it harps on the idea that Elizabeth and her country stand for freedom, including the freedom to follow whatever religion you like — which, historically, wasn’t true. As Victor Morton has put it, every Catholic child in England knows what a “priest hole” was.

The new film also follows a template that seems to owe a fair bit to The Lord of the Rings (in which Blanchett played the elf-queen Galadriel). The Spanish King Philip II (Jordi Mollà, taking over for the first film’s George Yiasoumi) says he is “sacrificing Spain’s forests” to build his mighty armada — echoes of Saruman tearing down the trees around Isengard, perhaps? And when the Spanish ships appear on the horizon, the watchmen light towers on mountain peaks across the country, just as we saw them do in Gondor. And it all leads to Elizabeth clad in solid armor and riding a horse and rallying her troops, just like Aragorn did.

Somewhere in all this, Elizabeth finds time to become embroiled in a sort of love triangle with Sir Walter Raleigh (Clive Owen), an explorer who has just returned with potatoes and tobacco leaves from an American colony that he named “Virginia” in honor of the Virgin Queen, and her lady-in-waiting, Elizabeth “Bess” Throckmorton (Abbie Cornish). Elizabeth is too firmly ensconced in her throne, and too conscious of her duty, to pursue her relationship with Raleigh very far — but this does not prevent her from lashing out when she hears of his involvement with Bess, in a scene that seriously robs the character of her dignity, both as a royal and as a person.

Showing the “real woman” behind the icon is, of course, partly what director Shekhar Kapur and screenwriters William Nicholson (Shadowlands, Gladiator) and Michael Hirst (TV’s The Tudors) are trying to do here. But do we really get a sense of who Elizabeth was? The previous film’s fictionalizations could be excused, to some degree, because it was making a thematically provocative point or two. But The Golden Age recycles much of the same basic material without offering any real insight into the woman or the times in which she lived. And where the previous film drew our attention to the way religious sentiments are manipulated for political purposes, the new film ultimately plays like an old-fashioned propaganda movie, in which the breath of God ensures that “our” side wins and the other side loses.

2 stars (out of 4)

–

Talk About It
Discussion starters

1. “Fear” is a recurring theme in this film. Which characters feel it? How do they deal with it? What is the film trying to say about “fear” in this day and age?

2. What does the film say about divine involvement in human affairs? Note how the Spanish king speaks of “miracles,” and how Elizabeth hopes for “the impossible.”

3. Does the film imply that God took a side in the battle between Spain and England? Do you think God ever prefers one side over the other when nations go to war, in these post-biblical times? If so, what part do human actions play?

4. Elizabeth says she will not be pushed around by the Fates; does the film indicate that she was successful in this, or was her success itself fated?

The Family Corner
For parents to consider

Elizabeth: The Golden Age is rated PG-13 for violence (a naval battle, a knife is pushed down a man’s mouth, spikes pierce the skin of a man kept in a cage), some sexuality (a man unlaces a woman’s blouse in bed) and nudity (we glimpse a naked woman from behind as she studies herself in a mirror). The villains are relentlessly portrayed as fanatical Catholics, and Elizabeth also consults an astrologer.

— A version of this review was first published at Christianity Today Movies.

elizabeth the golden age

Previous Post

October 11, 2007

Rambo IV gets yet another new title

Next Post

October 12, 2007 Elizabeth: The Golden Age -- the review's up!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Shema" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Wait Hear Pray Obey