Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
Review: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (dir. David Yates, 2007)

Review: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (dir. David Yates, 2007)

Last updated on: November 22, 2015 at 11:41 am by Peter T. Chattaway

Review: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (dir. David Yates, 2007) 2015-11-22T11:41:21-08:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

You have to feel at least some sympathy for any filmmaker who would tackle Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Not only is it the longest of the Harry Potter books, and thus one of the most difficult to compress to a single movie, it has also been regarded by many fans as something of a disappointment. Despite its length, and despite the fact that a significant character dies, not a lot seems to have happened by the time the story ends. Lessons are learned and secrets revealed, but of all the instalments in the series to date, it ends on the least satisfying note.

Even so, despite all these disadvantages, surely a better film could have been made than this one. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is a dark, grim, serious film, with little of the joy or whimsy that animated the first four movies — and while some of this can be chalked up to the source material, at least some of the blame has to go to the filmmakers, too.

First, the source material. The last film, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, ended on a dark and serious note — with the return of the Dark Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) and the murder of a student by his hands — but it also ended on a note of potential excitement: with the Dark Lord back, the war between his followers and those on Harry Potter’s (Daniel Radcliffe) side must be about to begin!

But it turns out that Voldemort keeps a low profile throughout most of Order of the Phoenix, partly because he wants the wizarding world to think that rumors of his return have been greatly exaggerated. And sure enough, when Harry Potter and his mentor, Hogwarts Headmaster Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon), try to tell their fellow wizards and witches that Voldemort has come back, they are accused — by the government, the media and their friends — of lying and fearmongering.

And so Harry, tormented by nightmares, waits for his enemy to show his face to the world. But Harry also waits for lots of other people. His best friends Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) don’t write him all summer, and for some reason Dumbledore seems to be avoiding him, too. And we’re more than halfway into the film before we get a glimpse of Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane), the friendly half-giant gameskeeper, who has been away on a secret mission.

As if all the waiting weren’t bad enough, Harry finds, when he gets to school, that he must spend a lot of time with teachers he hates. It turns out that his nightmares are not merely dreams, but signs of a link between his mind and Voldemort’s — so Dumbledore sends him to Severus Snape (Alan Rickman), the potions professor who loathes him, for special lessons on how to block Voldemort’s influence on him.

And then there is Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), the Ministry of Magic official who has been appointed the new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher — not so much because she knows how to teach, but because the government wants to keep a close eye on Dumbledore and prevent any more rumors about the Dark Lord from spreading. When Harry does insist, in class, that Voldemort is back, Umbridge summons him to a form of detention that Ron and Hermione rightly call “torture.”

And where, in all this, is the sense of wonder and enchantment? Once again, Harry learns a few new things about Hogwarts and the wizarding world in general, but there is little sense of awe about it this time. (When a door to a secret room appears in the wall of one corridor, it is a convenient plot device, nothing more.) And where is the humor? At times, the film aims for a little levity, but more often than not, these moments feel forced, dutiful, even recycled from the previous movies.

Worst of all, with the exception of Rickman’s delectably devious Snape, there are few if any of the “grace notes” that have made each of the previous films memorable in their own way. No matter how complicated the plots, no matter how outrageous the special effects, the Harry Potter movies have always made time for the characters and given them opportunities to shine: think of Neville Longbottom (Matthew Lewis) learning to dance in Goblet of Fire, or of Remus Lupin’s (David Thewlis) heart-to-hearts with Harry Potter in Prisoner of Azkaban. But there is little of that here.

Indeed, one of the striking things about Order of the Phoenix is how it brings back so many talented British actors — including Brendan Gleeson (Mad-Eye Moody), Julie Walters (Mrs. Weasley), Maggie Smith (Minerva McGonagall) and Gary Oldman (Sirius Black) — and gives them relatively little to do. And when Helena Bonham-Carter shows up near the end as one of Voldemort’s minions, you wonder why her arrival is treated with such fanfare, or why an actress of her stature was hired for what is little more than a cameo. Yes, no doubt we will see more of her in future films, but in this film, she’s just one of the many big names doing nothing in particular.

Why does the fifth Harry Potter film show so little feeling for its characters? Possibly because it is directed by David Yates, the fourth director to work on this series and the first with no experience on a Hollywood movie; most of his work so far has been in British television. Perhaps he was too busy learning the ropes of such a technically challenging film to keep his eye on the story’s heart and soul.

But I think the bigger problem is the screenplay, by Michael Goldenberg (whose last film was the live-action adaptation of Peter Pan). The first four movies, all of which were written by Steve Kloves, had to leave out bits of the books, and sometimes the omissions were puzzling, but at least they held on to the story’s central thread. The new film, on the other hand, is written in a much clumsier fashion.

Take Harry’s budding romance with Cho Chang (Katie Leung). The build-up to their first kiss is awkward and unconvincing, so much so that it has to be followed by a scene in which Hermione explains to Harry all the emotions that Cho must be feeling. And then, the next time we see Cho, the tone abruptly shifts, and the relationship between these two characters is left without any resolution at all.

In addition, the film introduces significant characters only to ignore their significance to the story later on. We see Sirius’s grumpy house-elf, Kreacher (voice of Timothy Bateson), but not the role he plays behind the scenes. We see Dumbledore come to the defense of Sybil Trelawney (Emma Thompson), the Divination teacher, after Umbridge has her fired — it’s one of the film’s rare touching moments — but the movie never underscores why Dumbledore is so protective of her, nor does it tell us the full significance of the prophecy she once made, and which Voldemort now seeks.

Even more puzzling is the climactic battle between the Death Eaters and the Order of the Phoenix — the forces loyal to Voldemort and Dumbledore, respectively — in the underground headquarters of the Ministry of Magic. Good guys and bad guys show up at arbitrarily convenient moments, as though they were waiting to make the most dramatic entrance; and the battle revolves, in part, around an archway with a curtain, the significance of which is never explained — even though it plays a crucial role in what is supposed to be one of the film’s most heartbreaking scenes.

At a few points in this film, we get flashbacks to Harry’s younger days — to scenes from the earlier movies. It is startling to realize just how much growing up Harry has done since the first film came out seven years ago. It is also sobering to think that a series that began with such potential is beginning to show serious signs of sequel fatigue. Let us hope that the franchise gets its second wind, and soon.

2 stars (out of 4)

–

Talk About It
Discussion starters

1. Sirius Black tells Harry Potter that he’s not a bad person, just a good person that bad things have happened to. Do you agree? Have good things happened to Harry? What has he done himself that might make him a good person or a bad person?

2. Sirius then says, “We’ve all got light and dark inside us. What matters is what part we choose to act on.” What choices does Harry make? What about the scene near the end when Harry tries to do something really bad but is told he did not succeed because he didn’t really “mean” to do it? Do you think he “meant” to?

3. It has been said that the greatest trick the Devil ever played was convincing the world he did not exist. How do Voldemort’s actions in this film parallel that?

4. Harry and Dumbledore are accused of lying and fearmongering when they say that Voldemort has returned. When have you been accused of lying because you said something you knew to be true? How did you handle it? How have you decided who to believe when other people have told you that someone is lying?

The Family Corner
For parents to consider

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is rated PG-13 for sequences of fantasy violence and frightening images. Harry and his closest friends are 15 years old when this story takes place, and the action is appropriate to audiences of that age but might be too scary or intense for younger children. The violent and frightening images include duels with wands, Dementors attempting to suck the souls out of people, and words being cut into the backs of students’ hands as punishment. Two boys also create foods that make faces break out in boils and other ailments.

— A version of this review was first published at Christianity Today Movies.

harry potter and the order of the phoenix

michael goldenberg

Previous Post

July 5, 2007

Simpsons to target religion, environmentalists

Next Post

July 10, 2007 Why so little blogging these days?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said "as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Joshua Peter Abraham