Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
The Ant Bully — the interview’s up!

The Ant Bully — the interview’s up!

Last updated on: April 8, 2016 at 10:44 am by Peter T. Chattaway

The Ant Bully — the interview’s up! 2016-04-08T10:44:01-07:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My interview with John A. Davis, director of The Ant Bully, is now up at CT Movies. I may post a longer version here in a few days.

JUL 29 UPDATE: Here it is, the full unexpurgated interview!

– – –

By Peter T. Chattaway

The creator of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius has already taken his imagination up, up, up into space, so it’s kind of fitting that the movie he made as his follow-up should point in the exact opposite direction — down, down, down into the very soil we walk upon.

The Ant Bully*, based on a book by John Nickle, concerns a boy named Lucas who is picked on by the neighborhood bully, and who vents his frustrations by picking on the ant colony in his front yard. The ants don’t take kindly to this, so they devise a way to shrink the boy down to their size — an experience that teaches Lucas a lesson or two.*

Director John A. Davis got his start in stop-motion animation, but it wasn’t long before he caught the digital bug. In 1997, he wrote and directed Santa vs. the Snowman, a TV special that was later expanded for IMAX 3D theatres; and in 1999, he served as the animation director for another Christmas special, Matt Groening’s Olive, the Other Reindeer. And then came Jimmy Neutron*, which was one of the first three films to be nominated for the Oscar for Best Animated Feature. (The others were* Shrek*, which won, and* Monsters, Inc*.)*

We talked to Davis about his history in animation, other bug movies, and, of course, The Ant Bully*.*

I want to talk first of all about your background in animation. The press kit mentioned that you came to digital animation from stop-motion.

John A. Davis: Yeah, I had a keen interest in stop-motion, which is what led me to start making films when I was a kid. I saw an animated film at a festival. The film was called Icarus, and it was a clay animation short, and while I was watching it, I had, like, a little revelation. I figured out how they were doing it — I was like, “Oh, I know how they’re doing this!” — and so I got excited, and when I got home, I got my parents’ home movie camera and started animating my action figures at home. Move ’em a little bit, take a frame, move ’em a little bit more, take a frame, get the film back, and I was really excited. “Wow, they’re dancing around on their own!” I was just sort of hooked.

And by the time I got to high school, I started a film club, and we would raise money with bake sales and car washes and things like that, and raise money and make movies! And so I just sort of kept going, and majored in film in college, and started my own business in 1987 with Keith Alcorn, who I was working with at the time at a company that had just gone out of business. And so we started DNA Productions out of my apartment in Dallas, just the two of us.

Was DNA involved in digital animation from the beginning, or did it cover multiple kinds of animation?

Davis: At the time, I was doing a lot of stop-motion mixed with live action on all my student films in college, and then when I got out and got into the workplace, for a couple of years I was working at this company, K&H;, and I was running their animation department and optical printing department. So I would be shooting animation on their animation camera rig — and this is all, like, old-school film stuff — so I was shooting a lot of 2-D cel-type animation, and also a lot of motion graphics and stuff that was really big in the ’80s. And my partner, Keith, had an art background, and would draw and design characters. So we kind of teamed up, and he would draw and design characters, and I would do the camerawork; and I continued to do some stop-motion animation and build miniatures and do stuff in my garage. But when CG started to come on the scene, I saw it as a way to do better stop-motion, because I was always limited by what I could build in my garage and how many lights I could afford to rent — and with CG, I had unlimited real estate and as many lights as I wanted, so I kind of had a keen interest in it.

How old were you when you saw Icarus?

Davis: I think I was, like, 14 or so.

I was 11 or 12 when I was making stop-motion cartoons with my Lego toys.

Davis: Oh, wow, that’s even earlier!

But I didn’t last anywhere near as long as you did, because I got distracted by video cameras and you couldn’t do animation with video, at least not then.

Davis: Right, right.

And even that didn’t last terribly long. Now, you mentioned the action figures, and I think, “Wow, isn’t that cool to think that that’s my action figure that’s really moving,” whereas now, with CGI, nothing’s real, it’s all just images on a screen. Do you miss that sense of connection to the physical?

Davis: Yeah, actually, there is that part of it that I miss. You miss being able to hold them in your hands, and just the physicality of it is really cool. But the upside, to me, just far outweighs the downside, because with CG you’ve just got so much more control, and so much more power that you can bring to the screen for the time and money spent, I think. And you can really rehearse the performance of the animation and add levels of detail and texturing and things and have a much bigger canvas. You can do those things in stop-motion, but it would require huge amounts of miniature work and much longer, and probably much bigger budgets, really.

Do you find that with CG there is a temptation to go almost too big, to exploit the opportunities as it were, now that the limitations aren’t there?

Davis: That’s one of the things that I tend to talk a lot about, too. Since you can pretty much do anything, you have to be careful not to get too excessive, and make sure that you maintain a sense of dynamics in your film, in terms of your colour palette and your camera and your story. In everything, you need ups and downs, and if you stay in any one place too long, it gets static — and even action scenes, if they’re too active, too long, it becomes static, and it starts to become monotonous.

So things like CG, where you can do anything with the camera — you can just fly the camera around things — directors that haven’t really done it before, they kind of fall in love with the idea that they can do that, and typically I’ll notice that a lot of times they keep the camera flying around constantly, and what happens is you lose that dynamic of being able to keep the camera still for the quieter moments, and then when the action kicks in, you’ve got some place to go and the camera can become very active and you can get really creative with what you do with it, but you have to hold back so that you have somewhere to go. And also, the same can be said with the electric colour palette. You want to keep your colours kind of toned down and muted for scenes that are more stoic and sombre, and then when things become more active or excited, then you get more saturated colours, and again, dramatically, you’ve got somewhere to go.

Your background on stop-motion gives you a perspective on digital animation. Toy Story came out 11 years ago. Do you find, with people who are just entering the field now, professionally, is it the case that they know nothing but digital, and they don’t have that perspective? Or do you still get the sense that people coming into the business have that broader sense of the different kinds of animation, and a more multidisciplinary background?

Davis: I think it’s starting to get better now, but for a while, when CG was first sort of popular — after Toy Story came out, it kind of opened the door for these films to be made and studios were jumping on the bandwagon — I saw a lot of animation schools pop up across the country, and I would get demo reels from kids that were coming out of those schools looking for work, but the problem was that those schools were not teaching the principles of animation, they were teaching software. They thought, “That’s how you become an animator, you learn the software.” It’s like, nope! All that is is just a paintbrush, you’re going to have to learn how to paint. I think eventually they came to learn that, so that they’ve gotten a lot better. But I think that what’s needed is an overall sense of filmmaking, so that even if you’re going to specialize in any one particular area, which is what you’ll typically wind up doing, you know kind of the idea behind how all the pieces fit, which is really important.

I read somewhere that there were something like 14 major cartoons coming out this year. When Jimmy Neutron came out five years ago, the field didn’t seem quite so crowded at the time, and in just five years, suddenly everybody’s making cartoons and they’re virtually all digital. Do you feel the marketplace is more crowded now?

Davis: There’s definitely more animated product out there. But to me, I tend to look it as another medium for delivering content, for delivering stories. And as long as you’re not telling the same story over and over again, I think it’s great. Case in point, right now it doesn’t get any more crowded than when we are premiering here. We’ve got Monster House this weekend, and us next weekend, and Barnyard the weekend after that. So it’s like, boom boom boom, three CG films right in a row. And I haven’t seen Monster House or Barnyard, but my sense is that our movies are very different from one another. Monster House looks like a horror film —

A Halloween film, yeah.

Davis: Yeah, very scary, a lot of scares. And then Ant Bully is more of an action-adventure film. And then Barnyard, I think, is more of a zany comedy. So I think they are three different types of stories and different types of films. And if they’re all good movies, then hopefully they’ll find an audience and be rewarded. But again, I think animation is just another medium for telling a story, and not necessarily thinking of it like, “Oh, we’ve got too many animated films,” because it would be like saying, “We’ve got too many live-action films.”

How did you feel about the fact that, last year, there were two major stop-motion films, Corpse Bride and Wallace & Gromit? Did you pine to go back to that at all?

Davis: No, I’ve just really been hooked on CG, and I really like the process, and it’s very liberating, in a way. For example, I don’t do as much hands-on as I used to — I used to do animation and now I just write and direct and produce — but what I do do is I still do pre-viz work, and I’ll do some of the 3-D animatics, especially for my action set-pieces, shot planning. So I did several hundred shots for our first animatics, just planning out the shots, so I’ll have my 3-D software running on my laptop and I’ll sit at home on my couch and watch movies, watch TV, and then I’ll be working on my shots, just kind of planning camera moves and rehearsing things, and, “Wow, this would be really cool if we started here and did this,” and that kind of stuff.

It’s been about eight years since Antz versus A Bug’s Life. When you decided to make this story, was there any concern about retreading that ground, as it were?

Davis: Absolutely. The project started after Jimmy Neutron came out. I was looking for the next project, and Tom Hanks sent the book to me, because The Ant Bully is based on a children’s book, sort of a picture book. And he was reading it to his son Truman one night, and he thought, “Hey, this might make kind of a good movie.” So he was a fan of Neutron, and really liked it, and he sent the book to me to see if I had a take on it. But yeah, I thought about it for a few days, and thought, “Aw, I’ve seen a couple of CG ants movies recently, maybe I could do it with bees or roaches or something.”

But really, the needs of the story dictated that it was really best told by ants, because they perfectly demonstrate the co-operation and sense of community, and I thought, “Well you know, this story is vastly different than the other stories,” and really, it had in my mind more in common with The Incredible Shrinking Man or Honey I Shrunk the Kids or something like that.

And I thought, if I was going to do it, how would I build this book into a film? And I started thinking about all the lessons that Lucas would learn, the story, and some of the set-pieces and action — battling wasps and being eaten by a frog and fighting giant exterminators and travelling back into his house and now seeing it from a different perspective — and I started getting excited.

And I started thinking how cool it would be to build this ant world and really depict it as this sort of advanced, somewhat alien civilization that we know nothing about that lives right under our feet — every day, epic struggles in the front yard and things that are going on — and I started getting really excited about the idea. And that’s one of the things that I went to talk to Tom about, and he definitely agreed, and so he said, “Let’s do it! Let’s make this!” And that’s kind of how it started.

How much creative input did Tom Hanks have into the process?

Davis: Initially, we talked about the broad strokes quite a bit, in terms of how the story would start — Do we start with the ants? Do we start with the humans? — because we had these two communities we were juggling. So we talked a lot about the story at the beginning, in terms of the structure; but after the second draft of the script, he loved it, and was happy, so it was like, “Go make it!” And he looked at the animatics and he would give some thoughts and stuff, but yeah, once he was happy, he was sort of like, “Hey, have fun!”

The press kit mentions that Lucas learns some valuable lessons. How important was it to get those themes into the story, for you? How important is the message, shall we say?

Davis: I think for me, every film, there needs to be a point to it. There needs to be a moral lesson that the audience can take away. At the same time, I don’t like to oversimplify it or shove it down their throat — it really needs to be implicit in the story. So it was important to really have the themes and the lessons coming out of Lucas’s journey come out of the story, without feeling like you’re talking down to the audience. So I was really careful to try to balance that, to make it clear that kids understand and parents understand what the story’s about, and what Lucas’s journey is. But kids are really sharp. They pick up on everything. So I don’t think you need to oversimplify things for them. And in our early test screenings, it was clear that they totally got it, and really responded well to the story.

The press kit says you made some revisions to the ending of the film based on the feedback you got from some of those kids.

Davis: Yeah, in the book — it’s a picture book, so there are very few words in it —

Kind of like The Polar Express?

Davis: Yeah, exactly, so it took a lot of fleshing out. But one of the things in the book is that, at the end of the story, the bully that had been picking on Lucas is suddenly shrunk down by the ants also. And it sort of ends with the ants now taking him down to teach him a lesson. And at first, I was staying kind of true to that. But then I invited the crew to bring some of their children up to watch it, and one of the kids said, “Oh, yeah, that’s cool, now Lucas is the bully,” or something like that, and I thought, “Whoa, that’s the wrong message!” If Lucas was party to the other kid being shrunk down and taken by the ants and didn’t do anything to stop it, then suddenly he was kind of being the bully himself in a way, and it was definitely the wrong message. So I redid the ending, and it was really more about Lucas being more proactive and displaying what he learned from his time with the ants, and kind of uniting the other kids to stand together against this bully.

So it’s not so much a vengeance theme, then, as it were.

Davis: No. Right, right, that would be the wrong thing!

Most cartoons are made and marketed with an eye to children, and looking at your filmography, the highlights are things like Jimmy Neutron, Santa vs. the Snowman and now this. What’s the primary attraction for you in making these films? Is it the animation, and children are the easiest market to make them for? Or are you very proactively interested in making, shall we say, family films?

Davis: I definitely have an interest in family films. I haven’t really had a story that I’m passionate to tell that is R-rated or extremely adult. I like this childlike sense of wonder about things. As you grow up, people get a little cynical, and I like — although I don’t have kids, my wife and I have dogs, because we work together all the time — but I’ve always kind of nurtured that sense of wonder about things in myself, and I think that attracts me to projects like that. Although I never really set out to make films for children specifically, it just sort of naturally happened. And I think probably — well, I know definitely my next film that I’m going to be doing is actually a live-action film, and it will still be for a family audience, but the protagonist will be older, a teenage young adult. So I think I’ll start, y’know, now I’m making films for teenagers and young adults, and then adults, and then probably years from now I’ll be making films for old men or something. So I’m just gradually working my way towards the octogenarians.

You graduated from Southern Methodist University, so I have to ask, can you talk about your religious background, if any?

Davis: Yeah, I went to SMU in Dallas, and I was raised going to a Methodist church, but I have since– I’m a spiritual guy, but to honest, I don’t really affiliate with any one denomination any more. I sort of have my own thing. But again, kind of going back to my sense of wonder at things, I constantly like to dote on the origins of, like, where did all this come from? I like freaking myself out by thinking about it.

But one thing I will point out: there are some interesting themes and images in the film, because I really enjoyed developing this ant culture and their beliefs. Because if you’re an ant, the exterminator must be like the Devil, so he’s Beals-a-Bug pest control, Stan Beals, and he’s got his red suit. And they have a belief in a higher ant being, the Ant Mother, which is like the mother of all the colonies. It just really helps kind of flesh them out; again, the images of good and evil are part of what makes them feel like a total society, to me. So that might be kind of interesting for you.

Yeah, sounds like somewhere between “the claw” in Toy Story and the mythology in Watership Down.

Davis: Right.

The bio also mentions that you won the first-ever Nash Clay Parsley award, and I Googled “nash clay parsley”, and Google did not turn up a thing —

Davis: It might have been the last one, too, I don’t know! When I was going to SMU, it was the year I was graduating, and it was kind of weird how it came about. I didn’t find out that I had received it until right after graduation, and it was some kind of a grant or something that had been donated by the parents of a student that went to school that I guess had died, that had been through the film program. And so part of it was to establish this grant in his name, and it was the first year that they did it, and it was to give to a graduating senior in the broadcast/film department that showed outstanding achievement, and then suddenly I was given this award, and I was like, “Wow, cool!” And then they made this big thing, it was the first one. But then I never heard of any others, so maybe it was the last one! I don’t know.

Interviews

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 25, 2006

Alfred Hitchcock -- the article's up!

Next Post

July 25, 2006 Has a movie ever had 3 bonus discs before?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Moses entered the Promised Land before he died.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE