Pascha, ever-virginity, point-of-view shots

Last updated on: May 1, 2005 at 11:30 am by Peter T. Chattaway

Pascha, ever-virginity, point-of-view shots 2005-05-01T11:30:00-07:00 Peter T. Chattaway

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Can’t let the day go by without blogging at least a little bit, so here’s an especially jumbled post for ya, mixing a bit of film, a bit of religion, a bit of personal anecdote.

I have been attending my wife’s Orthodox church for just a hair over two years now, and last night marked the third Pascha (Easter) service that I have attended there. In fact, the first Pascha service I attended was one of the very first Orthodox services of any kind that I had seen, before my wife and I were “officially” dating, and I was impressed right away; I vividly remember thinking it reminded me of some of the Jewish rituals I had seen and kind of envied in Fiddler on the Roof (my favorite musical of all time), and I vividly remember thinking that this would be a good thing to raise children with. I also happen to like many aspects of Orthodox theology that make a bit more sense to me than, say, the Augustinian and Anselmian attitudes that have dominated both Catholic and Protestant churches for centuries.

So, why am I not yet Orthodox myself? The main reason is that I’m still not sure what place there is for critical thinking in Orthodox thought. I know that there are critical, scholarly types in the Orthodox world — I have interviewed and worshipped with a few of them — but there is so much in Orthodox tradition that seems historically suspect to me that I can’t quite sign on just yet. And while I know that some of the more critically minded Orthodox people I have met have been able to bracket some of these things off and say, in essence, that such-and-such is just a tradition that poetically expresses a theological point, I am not quite there yet. Perhaps it’s my quasi-fundamentalist upbringing, which despite all my efforts is still inclined to look at things literalistically, but it still sounds to me like I would be making dubious assertions of fact if I were to assent without reservation to certain parts of the liturgy.

One example came up during last night’s service. First, some background. Despite some residual evangelical resistance to the idea, I have gotten quite used to the idea that Mary remained a virgin her entire life; to paraphrase an Orthodox e-pal of mine, we have simply forgotten what it was like to live in a culture with a pronounced sensitivity to “holiness”, and there is reason to doubt that a Jewish couple living within such a culture would have followed up the birth of Christ by carrying on like nothing unusual had happened. Think of how people in Jewish tradition removed their shoes when standing on holy ground, or — just to show how widely applicable this impulse can be — of how people sometimes joke that they will never wash their hands again, after they have shaken the hand of one of their heroes. Before I was married, it was easy for me to say that Joseph and Mary would have hopped in the sack some time after Christ was born. But now that I’ve got a more, ahem, experienced frame of reference, I do question whether I could have done that myself, if I had been in Joseph’s place, knowing that God himself had been in my wife’s womb.

So, the “ever-virgin Mary” is something I can accept, historically, at least in theory. But the traditions don’t stop there. And last night’s service in celebration of the Resurrection included a mention of one of these traditions, in this troparion: “Keeping the seals intact, O Christ, you rose from the tomb, you who did not harm the locks of the Virgin’s womb at your birth, and you have opened to us the gates of Paradise.” There was also a reference somewhere to Christ’s “painless birth”.

Now, I can appreciate why someone might want to say that Mary’s labour was no labour at all, to the point where even her hymen remained intact; it would symbolize a reversal of the “curse” of Eve, etc. But do I accept this historically? No. And I have talked to at least one Orthodox priest who does not accept this historically either, and he alluded to some other prominent Orthodox who see this in more symbolic terms, etc. So it is empirically possible to be Orthodox and to think critically about such matters. But I still want to avoid risking the appearance of expressing apparent assertions of fact that I do not, in fact, believe.

Then again — and just to put this in a broader context — the Good Friday service also included a reference to the medieval belief that pelicans feed their young with blood from their breast, as well as a quotation from Psalm 104 which reflects the three-tiered, flat-Earth cosmology of the ancient Hebrews. So if I can think symbolically about scriptural ideas that were once understood literally, then I should be able to do the same here.

I guess the problem is that, following C.S. Lewis, I have always seen the Bible as coming into sharper and sharper focus, with the heavy mythological stuff at the beginning and then becoming more and more historical as we approach the Christian era. And it seems a shame, to me, that things might have gone out of focus again, afterwards.

Anyway, what has all this to do with film? Two things. First, when I was watching a whole bunch of Jesus films last year, more or less in chronological order, as research for my essay in Re-Viewing The Passion, it struck me that Franco Zeffirelli’s Jesus of Nazareth (1977) was probably the first film to depict Mary giving birth. It struck me at the time that this was a very striking and innovative development in the genre, simply because it had never been done before; and now, I wonder if it might be even more revolutionary than I had realized.

Second, the troparion quoted above reminds me of one of Fr. Thomas Hopko‘s complaints about Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ (2004). I cannot find any reference to this particular point online right now, but when he spoke in Vancouver last year, he said that the resurrection scene in Gibson’s film was flawed because it implies the tomb was opened in order to let Jesus out, when, in fact, as Hopko puts it, the tomb was opened to let us in, so that we could see that Christ had been raised.

I am especially attuned to this subject right now since I have finally gotten around to reading Jesus and Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ: The Film, the Gospels and the Claims of History, in which Mark Goodacre devotes a page to the film’s use of point-of-view shots and then says, in a footnote:

The only review to notice this feature is Peter Chattaway’s, which speaks of the viewer ‘being drawn into the flow of Jesus’ own memories’ and adding, ‘By giving us the feeling of experiencing Jesus’ thoughts, and by making us privy to the prayers Jesus offers up as he submits to the will of his Father, The Passion draws us toward Christ’s full humanity like no film before.’ But Chattaway misses the significance of the view of the resurrection.

That’s a fair point — in my own writing on the film, I must admit I have practically ignored the ultra-brief resurrection sequence, basically because it really is ultra-brief, and little more than a coda to the film. The interesting thing is, whereas Gibson’s use of point-of-view shots throughout the film is a brilliant method by which to express both the humanity and divinity of Christ, his point-of-view shot in the coda may not be so orthodox, as it were.

Total tangent: Elsewhere, Goodacre says The Passion of the Christ marks “the first time that Jesus’ perspective has been shown by the use of aligning it with the camera’s perspective,” but this is not quite true. Jesus of Nazareth and Martin Scorsese’s The Last Temptation of Christ (1988) both leap to mind as examples of films that had done this before, albeit in much fewer and smaller doses. I kept a journal of sorts devoted to this point here while re-watching several films in this genre last year.

So … how was that for a string of loosely connected thoughts?

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 30, 2005

Is sci-fi relevant to our lives? And if so, how?

Next Post

May 2, 2005 Canadian box-office stats -- May 1

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anglican Planet Articles BC Christian News BC Report Bible Movies Bible Review Blog Books & Culture Campus Times CBC Radio Christianity Today ChristianWeek Essays Faith Today Festival Cinemas Guide Film Journals Georgia Straight Interviews MB Herald National Catholic Register Salvationist Today's Christian Two Chairs Ubyssey Uncategorized Vancouver Courier Vancouver Sun

Select a Month August 2025 April 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 May 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 March 2023 November 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 July 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 January 2012 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 November 2003 October 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 March 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 January 2000 October 1999 August 1999 May 1999 April 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 April 1998 March 1998 January 1998 November 1997 September 1997 July 1997 June 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 October 1996 September 1996 June 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 April 1995 November 1994 September 1994 September 1991

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said "as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Joshua Peter Abraham