Cynicism, Passion, and The Onion

Last updated on: June 14, 2013 at 10:37 am by Justin Hawkins

Cynicism, Passion, and The Onion 2013-06-14T10:37:11-04:00 Justin Hawkins

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve sworn off reading The Onion. It’s not that I don’t appreciate its sardonic wit or comedic genius. On the contrary, I think its writers are often some of the most apt cultural critics currently writing. But their analysis of the world has become so acute as to blur in my mind the line between reality and fiction. I vividly remember once clicking through the website and laughing at its startlingly accurate social comedy couched in the blackest of black comedy. Shocked shame was my response when suddenly I realized that I had switched Internet browser windows from The Onion to CNN, and instead of laughing at the farcical imaginings of The Onion’s editors, I had begun to laugh at the real tragedies of the world.

Now, this resolution of mine is no Kantian, categorical imperative decision; I will neither start nor endorse a widespread boycott, and I do not think that others should necessarily stop reading satirical news. Comedy is a powerful tool that ought to be wielded. Lewis has observed that Satan hates nothing more than to be laughed at, and the same can be said for totalitarian governments. The Onion has proved its ability to successfully poke fun at illiberal political institutions, and should be commended for that.

Nevertheless, I am cutting back on comedic reinterpretations of the news because I suspect that they stem from a deep well of cynicism. Satirical news isn’t new, but it has arguably never been more popular as it is today: Millenials consistently list Steven Colbert and Jon Stewart as their sources of news information. And the Millennial generation has a good excuse to be cynical. We have been promised much by politicians, universities, and careers, yet all those things have left us strangely unfulfilled. Globalization has allowed us to be acutely aware of the grave sufferings of the world, but faced with our apparent inability to combat those evils, we distance ourselves from them through slacktivism, sarcasm, cynicism, or black humor. This is an understandable, but ultimately unfulfilling view of life’s great drama.

Cynicism prohibits us from seeing the world as the theater in which the divine drama of redemption is played out. And if Christianity is to be believed, that drama is the central Fact of history. Authors like Marilynne Robinson work for “the re-enchantment of the ordinary,” the ability for us to train ourselves to see that the divine plan is going on routinely, right under our very noses, and a life well lived is one with some sense of God’s working in the world: “he who has ears, let him hear.”

Cynicism stunts that recognition by inclining us toward flippancy or fatalism. But as attractive as those options are, they are not viable ones for the Christian. Instead of succumbing to the numbing anodyne of cynicism which preys on our passion and is a solvent to our sincerity, the Christian’s posture toward the world ought to be one of earnestly and prayerfully desiring to see the advance of truth, goodness, and beauty in the creation that God loves so dearly. Humans are essentially laughing creatures, but the foibles and failures of humanity must always be seen as something more than the fodder for our merriment. As Lewis has written, “it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub and exploit—immortal horrors or everlasting splendors. This does not mean that we are to be perpetually solemn. We must play. But our merriment must be of that kind (and it is, in fact, the merriest kind) which exists between people who have, from the outset, taken each other seriously—no flippancy, no superiority, no presumption.”

A scoffer must cease his sniggering before he can be enraptured with the drama unfolding before him, but the Christian who prays fervently “may Your kingdom come” is never far from being blissfully caught up in the divine drama of history.

[Image of Stephen Colbert from Wikipedia]

cultural liturgy

culture

Previous Post

June 12, 2013

What We Can Learn from Young Atheists

Next Post

June 17, 2013 The Spirit and the Letter

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category ambition art beauty bible bios body Book Review cheap grace church community consumer church cultural liturgy culture deep practice desire dualisms economics education evangelicalism events faith family fare forward Film Review friendship games Gospel happiness hipster Christianity humility identity institutions irony issue previews Jesus just church justice Lent Letters to the Editor liberal arts liberal christianity literature liturgy love march madness mental health metaphysics misotheism moralism morality Movie Review music narrative naturalism new atheism passions philosophy place political theology Pope Francis power prayer privilege providence reading reason relationship remembering self resurrection science secular faiths secularism sexuality sin Social Media spirituality Sport suburbs suffering table of contents technology the future of faith the new apologetic the virtues theology thick doctrine transcendence Trinity truth tv Uncategorized violence Virtue vocation war work

Select a Month August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the name "Jesus" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Lord saves Prince of peace Teacher God is with us