Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Fare Forward

House of Cards

Last updated on: February 13, 2013 at 12:52 pm   by Jake Meador

House of Cards 2013-02-13T12:52:10-05:00 Jake Meador

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

House of Cards is a new American political drama released on Netflix instead of a traditional tv channel. Here are three thoughts on the series after having seen the first nine episodes.

First, one can’t help thinking of Tolkien’s description of men “who above all else desire power” while watching the series. The show is part Shakespearean tragedy in the mold of Macbeth and part Nietzschean homage to the over-man, played with consummate skill by Kevin Spacey. The difference, of course, between Tolkien’s idea of men and House of Cards is that Tolkien sees a way past the lust for power. But in the world of House of Cards, the characters who aren’t power-hungry are the weak ones who inevitably become chess pieces in the hands of the powerful. I’m not sure I know a better way to be made grateful for grace and the church than to see a story in which the dominant characters know only about the power of autonomous individuals. To set the world of Christianity, in which charity is both possible and best, alongside the world created by the greedy schemings of Frank Underwood is to see a bit more clearly the magic of the Gospel.

Second, the show highlights something that Rod Dreher wrote about earlier this week:

Some people see Old South plantation houses, and can only think of the slave labor and exploitation concealed by the beauty of those buildings and the grounds. Others see them and recognize a culture and a vision that had about it a quality of beauty and nobility despite the evil it did. Similarly with, say, Westminster Abbey. It was built by kings who were in many ways wicked and ruthless warmongers, by our lights today. And yet, to stand within the Abbey is to be overwhelmed by beauty, a beauty brought forth in large part by those rough men who called themselves royalty.

So too with the church. Pope Julius II, for example, was a fierce and fearsome Renaissance prince, and literally led his army into war. He was an immense improvement over the rotten Alexander VI, the Borgia pope, whose memory he execrated. Still, Julius was nobody’s idea of an ideal Vicar of Christ. And yet, if not for Julius, the artistic legacy of the Roman church would be much poorer. It was he who is responsible for St. Peter’s Basilica, and for commissioning Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel. Through these rough men came great beauty that to this day bears witness to truths hard to grasp otherwise.

It’s hard to deny the beauty of some of the buildings and scenes in Washington, DC depicted in the series. And yet that beauty exists alongside the gritty machinations of both Frank and Claire Underwood as well as many of their colleagues and rivals. So an opulent fundraiser for a charity outside of what looks a five star hotel happens alongside a group of picketers protesting about an education bill. Or, to move from the realm of fiction to history, a slave-owning president oversees enormous architectural achievements of great beauty at both his home in Virginia and in Washington itself. Or, to return to fiction and our first launching point, an elf named Feanor sets in motion the tragic arc of Tolkien’s Silmarillion through the creation of three jewels of indisputable, indescribable beauty. Point being—and this is important for traditionalists like myself to remember—that beauty seldom exists in a pure state in this world. On the one hand, this should help us brace ourselves against a romanticized understanding of our own communities or of history. Of course, on the other, it should equally brace us against a cynical dismissal of so many of the past’s great beauties because of some moral failing in one of the prominent figures of the era.

Third, it is difficult to watch the show without imagining the decadence of Rome (yes, I used the “d” word). The disparity in wealth between the powerful and the weak and the subsequent pride in that wealth amongst the powerful causes one to simply hope that the real DC is not as cynical as the DC of House of Cards. That said, as someone who comes from a state with a seven-term congressman who we know is corrupt, it’s hard to be too hopeful about the state of DC. Seen that way, House of Cards is essentially a chronicle of political decadence at an empire’s twilight.

art

beauty

power

Previous Post



February 12, 2013

Why Choose Theology?

Next Post



February 13, 2013 Take a Break—For Renewal


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category ambition art beauty bible bios body Book Review cheap grace church community consumer church cultural liturgy culture deep practice desire dualisms economics education evangelicalism events faith family fare forward Film Review friendship games Gospel happiness hipster Christianity humility identity institutions irony issue previews Jesus just church justice Lent Letters to the Editor liberal arts liberal christianity literature liturgy love march madness mental health metaphysics misotheism moralism morality Movie Review music narrative naturalism new atheism passions philosophy place political theology Pope Francis power prayer privilege providence reading reason relationship remembering self resurrection science secular faiths secularism sexuality sin Social Media spirituality Sport suburbs suffering table of contents technology the future of faith the new apologetic the virtues theology thick doctrine transcendence Trinity truth tv Uncategorized violence Virtue vocation war work

Select a Month August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I came from stone when struck, satisfying a grumbling multitude in the wilderness. What am I

Select your answer to see how you score.

Water Manna The Spirit Quail

Related posts from Fare Forward

Evangelical

Ignorance: A Blessing

Fare Forward

Evangelical

The Empathy Exams

Fare Forward

Evangelical

The Doomsday Machine

Fare Forward

Evangelical

The End of Night: Searching for Natural Darkness...

Fare Forward

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube