The 144,000 PARTHENOI of Revelation 14

Last updated on: December 14, 2014 at 9:54 am by mogget

The 144,000 PARTHENOI of Revelation 14 2014-12-14T09:54:34-05:00 mogget

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The story of the 144,000 who stand with the Lamb on Mt. Zion in Rev 14:1-4 is one of those “flashpoints” in the interpretation of John’s vision. Craig R. Koester’s new commentary in the Anchor Bible, vol. 38A, has something of a new approach. To begin with, here is Koester’s translation. The emphasis is mine, and it indicates the places at which I wish to further explain Koester’s approach:

Then I looked, and there was the Lamb, standing on Mount Zion. With him were 144,000 who had his name and his Father’s name written on their foreheads. And I heard a sound from heaven that was like the sound of rushing water and like the sound of loud thunder. The sound I heard was like that of harpists playing their harps. They sang what seemed to be a new song in from of the throne and the four living creatures and the elders. And no one could understand the song except the 144,000, who had been purchased from the earth. These were not defiled with women. Now these who follow the Lamb wherever he goes are maidens. They were purchased from humankind as first fruits for God and the Lamb. In their mouth no lie was found; they are blameless.

The smaller, but still interesting shift occurs in v.3. Most translations indicate that “no one could learn the song” except the 144,000. This is, indeed, an acceptable translation. Koester, however, draws upon “a suggestive contrast between the followers of the Lamb and the adherents of other traditions,” most specifically the initiates of the mystery religions. He acknowledges that other translations use the word “learn” but indicates that “the issue is not learning the words but learning what the song means – that is, understanding it…the new song speaks of being purchased by the Lamb, which the redeemed understand because they have received the benefits of Christ’s death” (609). This seems reasonable to me, indeed, one sings best when singing about what one has experienced or felt.

The other major shift has to do with two of the last four characterizations. To begin with, Koester writes that “Revelation does not assume that women are inherently unclean, since images of a woman giving birth and a woman at her wedding banquet are used in positive ways” (609). Indeed, the people of God, in the figure of the New Jerusalem, are described as the Lamb’s bride. Koester goes on to write that “Revelation uses marital imagery in a positive way and links defilement to behaviors that violate the marriage relationship.” Thus, adultery, immorality and prostitution are metaphors that connote “unfaithfulness toward God” rather than their literal denotations.

The second characterization of the 144,000 uses the Greek word parthenoi. This is often translated as “virgins,” which in a literal reading limits this select group to celibate males whose abstinence is either permanent or temporary. Koester rejects this sort of reading in favor of understanding the most basic characterization of the 144,000 as all the faithful (7:4,9). This leaves the question, then, of how to interpret the imagery of parthenoi. Readers who are familiar with Revelation will have already noted that Koester breaks up the sentence in 14:4b rather differently than do most. Remembering that the punctuation in NA27 is not part of the mss tradition, here is the Greek, followed by some major translations:

NA27: οὗτοί εἰσιν οἳ μετὰ γυναικῶν οὐκ ἐμολύνθησαν, παρθένοι γάρ εἰσιν, οὗτοι οἱ ἀκολουθοῦντες τῷ ἀρνίῳ ὅπου ἂν ὑπάγῃ.

Koester: These were not defiled with women. Now these who follow the Lamb wherever he goes are maidens.

NRSV: It is these who have not defiled themselves with women, for they are virgins; these follow the Lamb wherever he goes.

KJV: These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth.

NAB: These are they who were not defiled with women; they are virgins and these are the ones who follow the Lamb wherever he goes.

Note that the Koester translation does not take the parthenoi as an explanation of what it means to have avoided defilement with women. Concerning his choice of sentence structure, Koester writes (611):

The [traditional] break leaves the rest of the sentence with a finite verb, requiring a paraphrase: these [are] the ones who follow” (NAB) or “these follow” (NRSV). Grammatically, however, the words in 14:4b form a complete sentence: “those who follow” is the subject, are (eisen) is the verb, and maidens (parthenoi) is the predicate. The initial gar (now) introduces the new feminine imagery in 14:4b and relates it to the idea of purity without suggesting that parthenoi (maidens) explains the masculine imagery that precedes it. This use of gar is common (BDAG 189.2; cf. Rev 9:19; 16:14; 19:10; 21:25).

This sort of use of the imagery of virginity is fairly unremarkable for Zion, Israel, or Christians who are faithful to God and Christ. Moreover, it describes the 144,000, who are ALL the faithful, first in terms of male fidelity, and then in terms of female fidelity, as Koester writes. It’s kind of neat little solution, and AFAIK it is unique to Koester, so I will be interested to see how it is received.

Bible

Scripture

Previous Post

December 11, 2014

Our Dirty Hands

Next Post

December 14, 2014 Prolegomena to a Reconstruction of the Literary History of 1 Sam 1:1-4:1a: The Main Problems and Issues

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2013 Scriptures Administrative Apologetics Atonement Bible Book of Mormon Book Review BYU Doctrine Extra-Biblical Literature Family Feminism Guests History LDS Church History Leadership Marginalia Metaphysics Mormon Culture Mormon Studies Personal Issues Political Philosophy Politics Scripture Sexuality Speculation Spotlights Studying Religion Ten Tidbits The Tenure Track Theology Tips on Applying Series Tips on Being an Independent Scholar Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz