Pseudonyms and the Ad Hominem

Last updated on: May 1, 2014 at 2:06 pm by TT

Pseudonyms and the Ad Hominem 2014-05-01T14:06:51-05:00 TT

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Let me share my observations about being a pseudonymous Mormon blogger for over a decade. There is a common belief that bloggers who “hide” behind a pseudonym will abuse that position to do bad things. My experience, however, has not born this out. Instead, the pseudonymous blogger is often the target of rude treatment that is not only socially acceptable but even cheered on by some.

The use of a pseudonym becomes an occasion for those who use their real names to 1) indulge in a false sense of moral superiority; 2) engage in name-calling against those who do not use their real names because they dehumanize the person they are interacting with; and 3) discount arguments because of the perceived unreliability of their source.

As I have argued before, and noted again and again in my experience, the use of real names is not a neutralizer, nor a way of ensuring social costs for bad behavior in conversation. Rather, it is actually a way of smuggling certain privileges into the conversation to create uneven ground. Those with little risk in expressing their opinions seek to inflict costs on others without recognizing that social and economic costs are not evenly born. One’s education, employment security, maleness, callings, and other markers of social privilege become ways of asserting authority and silencing others.

I am continually shocked when commenters appear here, and assume gender identity of our bloggers and how that often changes the tone of their comments. The question of race is often even more revealing, as I have noticed from some bloggers who confidently assert that God is a racist, or those who defend the language of “curse” to speak about others, or even those who have argued in favor of the persistence of slavery on supposedly libertarian grounds. When white bloggers think they are talking about race with other white people, they tend to speak of “we” unreflectively, and consider the issues of race almost entirely in terms of how it affects other white people, revealing the privileges of whiteness in rather stark terms.

I am also continually surprised by appeals to expertise and authority that are waged against pseudonymous bloggers when a dispute arises. Those with the presumed authority of the status of “scholar” almost always treat a pseudonym as completely irrelevant, revealing so much about how much authority is flexed by those who believe they have it. The condescending approach many people take when interacting with a pseudonym lays bare the need for social privileges to succeed in certain conversations. These episodes reveal so much about our cultural expectation, and ultimately, a fundamental sickness in our LDS conversations. It is not that I believe that authority is entirely irrelevant, or even useless, but rather that the use of a pseudonym has show me how disproportionately valued it is.

As I have noted in previous posts, the use of a pseudonym has a long history in religious and political writing. For me, pseudonymity is a kind of spiritual and intellectual exercise. I have learned not to take for granted anything about my conversation partners. I have learned that I cannot rely on any social privileges I may enjoy to engage with others. I am pleased to report that I am often surprised by thoughtful people, whom I know nothing about, and may not have paid attention to because of their lack of certain statuses. I have also learned that those who use their real names, or who enjoy great amounts of social capital in some circles, are not exempt from making serious errors in judgment in their online behavior. And I have always assumed that ethical interactions are the a duty regardless of the name one takes in a conversation.

Ultimately, the argument against pseudonymous bloggers is the ad hominem, and a rather lazy one at that. Ironically, the opposition to the pseudonym is the perhaps the most pure form of ad hominem, equating the validity and worthiness of an argument with the status of the person making it. It can be applied indiscriminately under the false cover that anyone making an argument under a pseudonym is suspicious, or even equivalent to the worst kind of anonymous trouble maker. In my experience, it is not the use of real names that raises the level of our discourse, but the discipline of interacting with real arguments, seeking understanding, and exchanging ideas.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 25, 2014

Bill Hamblin on the Documentary Hypothesis

Next Post

May 1, 2014 Alma and Adieu: When Will the Tired Apologetic Arguments End?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2013 Scriptures Administrative Apologetics Atonement Bible Book of Mormon Book Review BYU Doctrine Extra-Biblical Literature Family Feminism Guests History LDS Church History Leadership Marginalia Metaphysics Mormon Culture Mormon Studies Personal Issues Political Philosophy Politics Scripture Sexuality Speculation Spotlights Studying Religion Ten Tidbits The Tenure Track Theology Tips on Applying Series Tips on Being an Independent Scholar Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz