What is the Moral Lesson of Genesis?

Last updated on: February 13, 2014 at 10:33 pm by TT

What is the Moral Lesson of Genesis? 2014-02-13T22:33:32-05:00 TT

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Latter-day Saints are studying the Old Testament this year. Unfortunately, many LDS readings of the Old Testament adopt a hermeneutic wherein the stories in Genesis provide moral role models. It seems that we have come to see the scriptures as a kind of guide book for living a moral life, in spite of the fact that the stories never tell their readers to emulate any of the characters. If we adopt this reading strategy, we miss important ways of engaging in moral reasoning, and quite frankly, misread the point of these stories entirely.

As an example of this misreading, in a recent Ensign article (pg 38), readers are directed to some women in the Old Testament, with the idea that “the characteristics and values that guided their actions have relevance for our day.” Sarah is praised for her patience in her righteous desires. So too with Leah and Rachel. Perhaps the reader neglected to notice that Sarah kicks her slave Hagar and her son into the desert when those “righteous desires” for a child finally come? Perhaps the reader does not understand that the women “given” to their husbands are household slaves when the wives cannot conceive? Yes, there is a different set of ideas about slavery in antiquity, but are we really going to praise the treatment of these slaves in these texts as examples of the moral qualities of these biblical women? The historical and ethical problems in the Ensign account abound in each treatment. And this reading the patriarchs as a morality tale is not an aberration in LDS sources.

By modern standards, the narratives of the partriarchs and matriarchs in Genesis depict pretty awful people. Tricksterism is one of the most pervasive themes in the narrative of the patriarches, from Abraham marrying his wife off as his sister for personal gain, Rebecca’s tricks on Isaac, Jacob’s tricks on Esau, Laban’s tricks on Jacob, Jacob’s tricks on Laban, Rachel’s tricks on Laban, Simeon and Levi’s tricks on Shechem, the brothers’ tricks on their father Jacob, Joseph’s tricks on his brothers, Tamar’s trick on Judah, etc. Perhaps the moral lesson here is about the negative consequences of trickery? This can hardly be the case in full. While some of these characters are punished for their trickery, many are not, and indeed prosper because of their actions. That these tricks often result in theft, murder, and other hazards should not be glossed as simply fulfilling the Lord’s will.

Part of the reason for having to clean up these stories is that they no longer make sense to us as they would have in their original context. Their status as sacred literature leads us down the path of thinking there must be something about morality here. However, these stories cannot make sense to us today without some historical knowledge.

These accounts in Genesis are not just individuals, but ancestors of ancient peoples, nations, and tribes. These stories have political import, explaining the characteristics and interrelationships of Israel and her neighbors, “foreshadowing” the authors’ present. These stories are etiologies about why the Edomites are how they are, what are the terms of the treaty and boundaries between Aramites and Israel, how the disliked Ammonites and Moabites are products of incest, and why they have better land for farming and pastures for sheep, why some tribes have prospered and others have failed, why the tribes quarrel, and why some places have altars to Yahweh. When these stories were told originally, they were a kind of map for the peoples of the ancient near east, a cartography of nations and places as told through their namesake. These stories are full of puns and allusions that ancient audiences would have recognized, often as jokes, about the peoples described in the text.

If there is to be a moral lesson from these texts, it is not about parenting tips or other modern morality we wrest from the scriptures. If we take them seriously, we also discover that honesty about our shortcomings is part of the story here. The accounts of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and their wives are not given because these figures are paragons of virtue, but because God covenants with these figures in spite of their imperfections. The lesson is about God’s faithfulness to his promises with full knowledge of the brokenness of those with whom he makes covenants. If we are to have any meaning today from these stories, they should be read as stories of imperfection and God’s love, the mistakes his chosen peoples knowingly and unknowingly make. They are our role models not because we should emulate their righteousness or their wickedness, but because God has promised to be with them as he has with us.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 28, 2014

Remember that one time God totally denied having a body in restoration scripture?

Next Post

February 20, 2014 Friendly Fire on Mormon Scholars

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2013 Scriptures Administrative Apologetics Atonement Bible Book of Mormon Book Review BYU Doctrine Extra-Biblical Literature Family Feminism Guests History LDS Church History Leadership Marginalia Metaphysics Mormon Culture Mormon Studies Personal Issues Political Philosophy Politics Scripture Sexuality Speculation Spotlights Studying Religion Ten Tidbits The Tenure Track Theology Tips on Applying Series Tips on Being an Independent Scholar Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz