Christianity 101, BoM Style

Last updated on: January 7, 2012 at 10:18 am by mogget

Christianity 101, BoM Style 2012-01-07T10:18:12-05:00 mogget

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tis the start of the New Year, and therefore the start of a new lesson cycle for those of us who serve as teachers in church. What to do, what to do, we think. A class participant who is 48 years old may have heard the lessons we are supposed to present some ten or so times! And this year the Sunday School lesson cycle is the Book of Mormon, which most people can actually read if they try, so it’s not like we’re going to surprise anyone with some new verses about the theological insights of the mothers of the stripling warriors or whatever…

Fortunately, I don’t have that problem. I’m teaching the oldest adolescents this year, so I seem to have four young gentlemen in their last two years of high school. They’ve had these lessons perhaps only three times! However, since they are teenagers it is quite possible that they do already know everything there is to know with that incorrigible certainty so characteristic of youth…

What to do, what to do? I think maybe I’ll read the BoM with them for entrance and insights into the foundational aspects of Christianity, in hopes that this will give them a bit of confidence as they head out on their missions in three or so years.

Take that quotation from Joseph Smith regarding the Book of Mormon as “the most correct book.” I was probably supposed to use it to inspire confidence in the accuracy of the Book of Mormon. But you know, for these guys who are going to have to talk about scripture with utter strangers I thought it best to open up a conversation about the nature and sources of error in scripture. Real confidence with scripture, I thought, comes not from some vague and self-serving assurance that there are few errors, or no errors of importance, but from having the knowledge and skills to approach error in scripture, regardless of where it is found, with poise.

I was interested to find that most of them could contribute types and sources of mistakes in scripture. One young man even allowed as how he had “heard that there were genres in the Bible that were not supposed to be read literally.” However, I was saddened (and unsurprised) to find that none of them had any ideas about how believers who think carefully about these things deal with the intersection of error and revelation. It is quite one thing to assert that scripture is correct only insofar as the processes of transmission allow, but another matter to take that next step and decide what to do about it!

So far, I’ve just introduced them to a discreet version of the Catholic approach, “that the books of Scripture must be acknowledged as teaching solidly, faithfully and without error that truth which God wanted put into sacred writings for the sake of salvation” (Dei verbum 11). The immediate consequences of this are twofold. First, “the things of salvation” must be carefully studied out because it does not follow that they are laying around like sea shells on the shore for casual beach walkers to pick and discard. The second is that information of a scientific and historical cast has no divine guarantee and so we may choose to investigate it or not, without prejudice to the presentation of matters of salvation. And for now, that will do.

More later, gotta go to the gym,

Mogs

Book of Mormon

Scripture

Studying Religion

Previous Post

January 6, 2012

"Every wo/man that striveth for mastery": Thinking About LDS Scripture Mastery (A New Series of Posts)

Next Post

January 8, 2012 I am a Tim Tebow fan

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2013 Scriptures Administrative Apologetics Atonement Bible Book of Mormon Book Review BYU Doctrine Extra-Biblical Literature Family Feminism Guests History LDS Church History Leadership Marginalia Metaphysics Mormon Culture Mormon Studies Personal Issues Political Philosophy Politics Scripture Sexuality Speculation Spotlights Studying Religion Ten Tidbits The Tenure Track Theology Tips on Applying Series Tips on Being an Independent Scholar Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz