Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Faith-Promoting Rumor

Tips on Applying for Grad Programs in Religious Studies (Pt III)

Last updated on: December 3, 2008 at 2:39 pm   by smallaxe

Tips on Applying for Grad Programs in Religious Studies (Pt III) 2008-12-03T14:39:59-05:00 smallaxe

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Perhaps the single most important part of the application is the statement of purpose (also called the letter of intent, among other names). The statement will vary in length, depending on whether you’re applying to a master’s program or a PhD program, as well as the school’s specific requirements. Generally speaking, however, a statement of purpose for a master’s program will usually be limited to 500-1000 words. A statement of purpose for a PhD program will likely be limited to around 1500 words. What I’m going to do here is to concentrate on PhD programs, although the advice also works for master’s programs, with a few exceptions (which I’ll try to note at the bottom).

Here are some tips I found helpful. They’re in no particular order, and if anyone would like to add anything, please do.

1) Discuss the questions that motivate you. One of the primary things an admissions committee is looking for is a candidate with a couple of focused, interesting, and burning questions they can bring to the program. Focused questions are neither too broad nor too narrow. They demonstrate that you’ve done some thinking about a topic and that you may even have a general sense of where you’re headed, but you’re open to learn a lot more. If your questions are too broad it could mean you haven’t really grappled with the issue much. If your questions are too narrow it might convey the idea that you’ve already solved your problem, and in essence don’t need the help of a PhD program to engage it. Interesting questions address current debates in your field and the interests of those you want to be working with. Burning questions are those which you can continue to ask for years on end. In other words, these need to be questions that you can (and perhaps will) ask throughout your PhD studies. Here are some examples. Bad question: Why is ritual so important in religion? Good questions: Can we assume that ritual is a universal phenomenon? If not, how do we create the discourse and vocabulary necessary to do comparative work?

The important thing about “selling yourself” is positioning your ideas in the form of questions as your number one selling point. While other selling points are important, I would say that none are as important as this.

2) Prove that you have the motivation to engage your questions. You can incorporate past experience here as demonstrative of your motivation. “During my master’s program…” or “In studying with Professor…” or “While living in…”. An admissions committee wants to know that you have the stamina to make it through the 5-10 years of a PhD program.

3) Show that you’ve acquired some of the skill-set necessary to engage your questions. Admissions committees realize that you’re not going to come into the program with all the skills necessary to write a dissertation or to become an academic. At the same time they do want to know that you have acquired some of the skills and are acquainted with working to do such. This might include some of the language skills necessary (another post will have to be done to define what this means).

4) Have people read it; especially people that are on the faculty of the school you’re applying to. I paid more attention to the advice for restructuring my statement from people on the actual admissions committees. It was also helpful to get feedback from some of the current students as well as other friends who knew me (although the latter may not understand the process of writing a statement of purpose for a PhD program). While doing this, don’t be too assertive. This is a fine line to walk, and being already enrolled in a school you’re applying to (for a master’s program for instance) will help you to know the culture of the school; but generally speaking, you’d have to create a relationship with your would-be advisor in the first place. And if the relationship is good, asking him or her to take a look at the statement shouldn’t be too much.

5) Get examples of successful statements. I can’t over state how much it helped me to see other successful statements for the programs I was applying to. This is where networking (especially through LDS channels) could come in handy if you’re applying to schools at which you know no other students. I think I had about half a dozen or so statements of purpose from people who had been accepted into the programs I was applying to. Coincidentally most of the schools I was unable to get successful letters from I was not admitted to.

6) Include something about why it’s significant for you to study at the institution your applying to. This is where you’d customize your statement a little for each application. What profs do you want to work with? Library facilities? Other nearby institutions? Organizations affiliated with the university? Etc.

For master’s programs, I would recommend most of the same things except I’d keep in mind that expectations in terms of points 1-3 are not as high.

Again, these aren’t hard and fast rules, so they’re open to be challenged and I welcome any additional thoughts.

Previous Tips: Part I. Part II.

Spotlights: YDS.

Tips on Applying Series

Previous Post



December 3, 2008

Reading the Christmas Stories: What is biblical criticism? Part 2

Next Post



December 4, 2008 Applying to Graduate Programs, (part iv): Language Study


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2013 Scriptures Administrative Apologetics Atonement Bible Book of Mormon Book Review BYU Doctrine Extra-Biblical Literature Family Feminism Guests History LDS Church History Leadership Marginalia Metaphysics Mormon Culture Mormon Studies Personal Issues Political Philosophy Politics Scripture Sexuality Speculation Spotlights Studying Religion Ten Tidbits The Tenure Track Theology Tips on Applying Series Tips on Being an Independent Scholar Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prophesied against Tyre, predicting it would become a bare rock?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joel Daniel Amos Ezekiel

Related posts from Faith-Promoting Rumor

Latter-day Saint

Taylor Petrey is Tenured: What does This Mean...

Faith-Promoting Rumor

Latter-day Saint

Tips for the future LDS grad school applicant

Faith-Promoting Rumor

Latter-day Saint

Tips on Applying: Spotlight on the Catholic University...

Faith-Promoting Rumor

Latter-day Saint

Tips on Applying: Spotlight on Duke

Faith-Promoting Rumor

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube