Classical Figures

Last updated on: January 3, 2006 at 10:34 pm by mogget

Classical Figures 2006-01-03T22:34:21-05:00 mogget

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One way to better appreciate the impact of biblical prose is through attention to the so-called classical figures. The “standard” reference work for biblical figures is E.W. Bullinger’s Figures of Speech Used in the Bible. Bullinger’s work, originally published in 1898 and since reprinted, contains sections on 217 different figures, some with more than 30 variations.

Following Bullinger, a figure “is a word or sentence thrown into a peculiar form, different from its original or simplest meaning or us” (p. xv). Therefore, recognition and classification of a figure is not strictly an objective decision. Bullinger’s samples represent a very generous estimate. If in doubt, you can always consult a more modern commentary.

Bullinger writes on both the positive value of noting these figures, and on the deleterious effects of missing them with all the piety of a 19th century churchman. On the value of classical figures, Bullinger notes that they are used:

“always for the purpose of giving additional force, more life, intensified feeling and greater emphasis. Whereas today ‘Figurative language’ is ignorantly spoken of as though it made less of the meaning, and deprived the words of their power and force. A passage of God’s Word is quoted; and it is met with the cry ‘Oh, that is figurative’ – implying that its meaning is weakened, or that it has quite a different meaning, or that it has no meaning at all. But the very opposite is the case. For an unusual form is never used except to add force to the truth conveyed, emphasis to the statement of it, and depth to the meaning of it” (p. vi; emphasis in original).

Bullinger’s point is that figures break the expected diction or syntax in an attempt to call the reader’s attention to something. An alert reader is usually rewarded for pausing to sort the matter out. On the other hand, those who do not invest the effort are warned:

“…translators have made blunders as serious as they are foolish. Sometimes they have translated the figure literally…sometimes they have taken literal words and translated them figuratively. Commentators and interpreters, from inattention to the figures, have been led astray from the real meaning of many important passages in God’s Word; while ignorance of them has been the fruitful parent of error and false doctrine. It may be truly said that…the erroneous and conflicting view of the Lord’s People have their root and source, either in figuratively explaining away passages which should be taken literally, or in taking literally what has been thrown into a peculiar form….thus, not only falling into error, but losing the express teaching, and missing the special emphasis which the particular Figure was designed to impart to them” (p.xvi).

With that, here are three examples drawn from the opening chapters of Genesis, with Bullinger’s commentary:

Anadiplosis, or like sentence endings and beginnings, is the very first figure in the OT.

From Gen 1:1-2: In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form and void…

This figure “is used to call our attention to, and emphasize the fact that, while the first statement refers to two things, “the heaven and the earth,” the following statement proceeds to speak of only one, leaving the other entirely out of consideration” (p. 251).

Similarly Gen 7:18-19: “…and the ark went upon the face of the waters. And the waters prevailed exceedingly.”

and Gen 31:6-7: “Ye know that with all my power I have served your father. And your father hath deceived me, and changed my wages ten times…?

The second figure found in the Bible is paronomasia, or rhyming-words. With this figure, our attention is called to two things by a similarity of sound. “Otherwise, we might read the passage, and pass it by unnoticed; but the eye or the ear is at once attracted…and our attention is thus drawn to a solemn or important statement which otherwise would have been unheeded” (p. 307).

From Gen 1:2 And the earth was tohu va-vohu (unformed and void).

Finally, the third figure is aposiopesis, or sudden-silence. “It is the sudden breaking off of what is being said (or written) so that the mind may be more impressed by what is too wonderful, solemn, or awful for words: or when a thing may be, as we sometimes say, ‘better imagined than described.’” (p. 152). The earliest example of this in the OT is an example what is “too awful” for words:

Gen 3:22 And now, lest he put forth his hand, take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever—Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden…

Pausing long enough to note the sound of this sudden silence definitely adds to the impact of the story.

But Bullinger was not totally without a sense of humor and proportion. From his entry on battalogia, or vain repetition, we read:

“These are repetitions, of course, which are vain, meaningless, and senseless. None of these is to be found in the word of God. Indeed, we are exhorted not to use them as the heathen do…The Holy Spirit therefore does not use them: so that we have no examples to give for this figure which man has named and so frequently uses.

Examples of man’s use of battalogia may be easily found, e.g., 1 Ki 18:26 or Acts 29:34, etc. Also in the Prayer Book.” (p. 404).

One cannot help but wonder whether Bullinger’s pastor was acquainted with Bullinger’s thoughts on the matter.

Marginalia

Previous Post

January 2, 2006

Secular Sam’s Guide to the Old Testament: Moses and Satan

Next Post

January 6, 2006 Historical Jesus — Italian Trial

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2013 Scriptures Administrative Apologetics Atonement Bible Book of Mormon Book Review BYU Doctrine Extra-Biblical Literature Family Feminism Guests History LDS Church History Leadership Marginalia Metaphysics Mormon Culture Mormon Studies Personal Issues Political Philosophy Politics Scripture Sexuality Speculation Spotlights Studying Religion Ten Tidbits The Tenure Track Theology Tips on Applying Series Tips on Being an Independent Scholar Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz