Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Faithful Democrats

The Benefits and Risks of a Clinton-Warren Ticket

Last updated on: July 13, 2016 at 11:55 am   by Guest Contributor

The Benefits and Risks of a Clinton-Warren Ticket 2016-07-13T11:55:44-06:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As primary season comes to a close and the general election begins to ramp up, so too does the speculation regarding the potential Vice Presidential nominees.  The scrutiny under which potential candidates are put is enormous and given the unusual nature of this election cycle, unusual things may happen. Both campaigns may attempt to alter the course of the election in their favor by choosing a Vice Presidential candidate who may normally have never been considered.  Enter Elizabeth Warren.

Even a few months ago, the thought of an aggressively liberal, two-woman, Clinton-Warren ticket was borderline outrageous, but not anymore.  Polarization on both ends of the spectrum has pushed each party outward and a progressive firebrand like Warren, with her aggressive regulatory agenda, has become the candidate of choice for many Democrats as well as many of those in the media.  However, it would be incorrect to read to Warren’s recent aggression towards Trump combined with her appearance alongside Hillary in Ohio as a sign that she is Hillary’s Vice President in waiting.  She may be on the shortlist, but it is important to consider the possible benefits of adding Warren to the campaign as well as the risks.

Warren’s fiery rhetoric and ability to attack Donald Trump in his very own manner make for must-see headlines.  She would electrify the liberal wing of the party, bringing in so many of those Bernie supporters who claim they would never vote for Clinton.  Party unity after this tough primary is as important as ever in the effort to ensure that Donald Trump never gets to the oval office.  In fact, a two-woman ticket could be Trump’s ultimate kryptonite given his blatant misogyny, as well as being a symbolic victory for gender equality.  Warren’s ability as an attack dog is important, but her ability to excite voters may be what Clinton needs the most.  One huge potential problem for her campaign is energizing voters and getting them to the polls.  Not adding Warren to the ticket could end up alienating liberals and strengthen Trump’s bid.

There are a few good reasons to question the myth that Hillary is struggling with liberals and that only by choosing Warren as VP would young, liberal, Bernie supporters go to the polls.  Clinton is already viewed favorably by 80% of self-identified Democrats.  And, among “liberal” Democrats, the group that Warren would bring into the campaign, 79% had favorable views of Clinton.  If, as these numbers suggest, Hillary is not actually struggling with liberal voters, Warren could potentially cause more problems than she would make up for.

Warren is loathed by conservatives, so much so that any conservatives sitting on the fence, reluctant to support Trump, may actually perceive his campaign as the lesser of two evils and be pushed to vote for him rather than even just staying home. Trump would inevitably frame this two-woman ticket as the most liberal in history, which could make some voters skittish.  By choosing Warren, Clinton also risks alienating financial and business players.  Wall Street has, up to this point, been scared off by Trump and in large part supported Hillary.  But, with the aggressively anti-banking Warren on the ticket, they may find the prospect of a Trump presidency may begin to sound more promising.  On top of all of this is the fact that Warren’s Senate replacement would be appointed by Massachusetts’s Republican Governor, which would be a blow to the Democrats effort to take back the Senate.

It is no secret that Clinton and Warren do not have the warmest of relationships, nor do their agendas necessarily agree.  In fact, the biggest drawback to Warren’s being selected to run alongside Hillary may be these differences.  As Vice President, Warren very well could find herself tethered to Hillary’s agenda and unable to pursue her own.  This would likely mean taking a step back from the kind of aggressive regulation and activism that has made Warren a star in her own right.  In fact, it may be Warren’s stardom that is the greatest impediment to her being made VP.

During her time as Senator from Massachusetts, Warren has amassed a sizable following of her own and quickly became one of the most recognizable faces in the Democratic party.  That, combined with the two women’s different agendas could mean trouble in the White House, with the charismatic Senator from Massachusetts potentially outshining President Clinton from her role as VP.  So, when considering Elizabeth Warren for her VP, Hillary may face a potential trade off between votes and her own to-do list as President.  However, there is another likely scenario that could play out.

From her powerful position on the Senate banking committee, Warren is in a prime position already to go after the banks she so badly wants to go after.  She would be free to not only pursue her own agenda in what could very well be a Democrat-majority Senate all while still being free to do her worst when attacking Donald Trump.  In fact, she may even be in a better position to go after Trump too as a Senator rather than VP candidate.  Without having to worry about a direct tie to the campaign and all the careful planning and deliberation that would have to go into each attack (as well as the inevitable softening,) Warren would be free to go for the jugular, so to speak.  And even then she would still be able to serve a potential Clinton administration by helping to push Hillary’s own agenda through the Senate.  Hillary can reap all of the benefits of working with Warren without any of the risks associated.

Warren’s ability to excite liberals may prove to be enough to win her the nomination.  While that may mean the Clinton campaign would lose some backing among financiers and moderates, it very well could be enough to win the election.  However, it would be foolish not, at the very least, to assume that simply because of the excitement that choosing Warren would bring that she is the best person for the job or even that the job is the best one for her.  Careful deliberation is needed, which thankfully is Hillary Clinton’s strong suit, in weighing the outcome of whoever she ends up choosing.  And regardless of whether or not she is Vice President, Senator Warren has set herself up for even more popularity and power following these elections.

 

Sam QuinanSam Quinan is a Summer Fellow at Eleison Group, a faith based political, governmental, and non-profit consulting firm.  He recently graduated from Colgate University where he studied History and Economics.  Sam is from Richmond, Virginia and currently lives in Washington, DC.

Uncategorized

2016

election

election 2016

elizabeth warren

Hillary Clinton

politics

vice president

Previous Post



July 11, 2016

Why Trump's Invasive Brand Is Actually Unpatriotic

Next Post



August 8, 2016 Truth, Tolerance, and the Rise of Trump


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In 2 Peter, what does Peter say he will make every effort to help believers do?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Always remember these things after his departure Avoid false teachers Stand firm in faith Grow in grace

Related posts from Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

King, Isaiah, and the Politics of Now

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

A Democratic Revival

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Is Donald Trump the Antichrist?

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Truth, Tolerance, and the Rise of Trump

Faithful Democrats

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Gas Prices: What Would Jesus Pay?

Many of my conservative Christian friends have been having a field day...

Jesus Was a Social Deviant: A Brief History...

  Americans like to say that this country was founded on the...

On Max Lucado Preaching At Washington National Cathedral

There has been a bit of controversy over the past week about...

Digital Deception: How We Ended Up Here And...

The American experiment has reached its moment of reckoning, and we seem...

“The evangelical vote is more diverse than you...

Rev. Jim Ball, EFB Co-Chair, is one of the voices featured in...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube