Why Big Bird Matters

Last updated on: October 5, 2012 at 8:14 am by Eric Sapp

Why Big Bird Matters 2012-10-05T08:14:27-06:00 Eric Sapp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is no question that the President’s performance in the debate was disappointing, mostly because it’s clear he’d actually been coached and prepared to come in looking professorial and focused on facts instead of values. The lack of compassion and empathy Romney has shown throughout the campaign, perhaps best summarized by his recent 47% comments, are why Obama is still well ahead in the swing states, and Obama should have focused on the different values and vision of each campaign. And it’s hard to win a debate on facts when the other side “isn’t going to be governed by the fact checkers” (to quote Romney’s pollster).

The initial focus and coverage on the debate has thus far understandably focused mostly on style. Romney has always been good when he is working from a script, and he won all the style points last night. But it’s interesting looking at the instant polls and ones that have come out this morning that despite the better performance, numbers aren’t moving much. Part of the reason is surely that most voters have made up their minds already. But another factor, and one that I think will play out more in the coming week as the media and others reflect more on the debates and what this first one meant, is that Romney didn’t address his biggest flaws…and in fact, he actually reinforced them.

Exhibit A: The Big Bird issue.

I totally understood what Romney was trying to do with the PBS thing. He wanted to show he was tough by saying he’d cut the debate moderator’s program. But he also wanted to show he wasn’t heartless–that he was one of us and understood kids–by saying he loved Big Bird. But the fact that he made that statement at the same time that he said he planned to cut all funding to PBS and the programs that allow Big Bird to exist communicated the complete opposite. It showed that in fact he didn’t really love Big Bird. And far from demonstrating his human side, it showed Americans he doesn’t understand us.

It’s like a dad that tells his kid he understands why he brought the injured puppy home and that the dad too had a loyal dog he loved when he was young…but then says the family can’t afford to care for it and takes the puppy out back and shoots it. If you really do love something, you don’t destroy it. If Romney really thinks Big Bird is great and if Big Bird really did touch his heart, how could he so callously talk about the need to destroy the institutions that created Big Bird?

There is a reason that the internet is abuzz with Big Bird stuff. There is a reason that in the 90 minutes of mindless numbers, that this is the point people remember and that has captured emotions. And it matters because Romney’s biggest liability is that he can’t relate. Voters don’t trust him or believe he will care about them. Voters don’t want a heartless CEO who can fire a father with a kid in the hospital before Christmas because it adds slightly to the bottom line. They want someone who understands their problems and will put them first.

Romney’s already called millions of hard-working American parents “victims” who will never take personal responsibility for their lives. Now in an effort to show he was human, he’s smiled as he’s said he’d end Big Bird. This and his admitting he’d turn Medicare into a voucher program are going to get more attention with time. And as the numbers fade and people remember Obama wasn’t a good debater but Romney wants to kill Big Bird and childrens’ programs, the emotions that drive political decisions will continue tipping against Romney.

And if you’re not already, follow: @FiredBigBird Hillarious and insightful.

@SappEric

Previous Post

October 4, 2012

Debate Debrief: Romney vs. The Truth

Next Post

October 9, 2012 Jesus Doesn't Care or Why Liberals Need Christ

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was healed from leprosy after obeying Elisha's command to wash in the Jordan?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Naaman Jehu Hazael Jeroboam