Having It All, or Having Full Humanity?

Last updated on: December 8, 2012 at 8:22 pm by Jessica Church

Having It All, or Having Full Humanity? 2012-12-08T20:22:06-07:00 Jessica Church

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s been a busy week in media. Notably, the U.S. Supreme Court passed down decisions on Arizona’s immigration law and the Affordable Care Act; sadly, screenwriter Nora Ephron passed away; and in the world of sports, Wimbledon is in full swing and the Olympics are right around the corner. What I can’t seem to get out of my head, though, is an article I read Monday afternoon during my lunch hour. I’m talking about last week’s piece in the Atlantic written powerfully and thoughtfully by Anne-Marie Slaughter entitled, “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All.”

In the piece, Slaughter talks about her career path, the struggles she’s faced, and the decisions she’s made; but at the heart of her message, she is trying to convey that there is something fundamentally and structurally wrong about the workplace. I hesitate to summarize her argument, just as I am always wary of trying to explain concisely how other social diseases like racism and class discrimination are institutional problems, but for the sake of this post I’m going to try.

There is a message sent to women in the workplace by both men and other women that you can “have it all” if only you work hard enough, sleep little enough, and be dedicated enough. By “all” we mean a family, a great career, and maybe some semblance of a social life (ha!). But in a workplace built by men, there are seemingly insurmountable obstacles for women, the roots of which boil down to some really basic choices. For example, can working from home be a valid and respected option one or more days per week? Can in-house, in-person meetings be scheduled during the hours of the school day rather than evening dinners, thus alleviating the need for extra nanny finagling? Can we applaud rather than disparage men who turn down promotions and extra responsibility because it is in the best interest of their family? And can we embrace the fact that yes, women are the parent (in a heterosexual relationship) more likely to leave work early when a sick child calls from the nurse’s office at school, but that having that woman in the workplace is important and valuable for the company because she brings things to the table that men do not?

As I read the article, I had to ask the question: Is there a Christian side to this conversation? I suppose the most accurate answer to that question is yes, in fact there are many Christian voices in this conversation, but among the Christian voices, their differences can often outweigh their similarities, so much so that it is hard to unite around anything. One biblical voice says Husbands, in the same way, show consideration for your wives in your life together, paying honor to the woman as the weaker sex, since they too are also heirs of the gracious gift of life – so that nothing may hinder your prayers (1 Peter 3:7). Okay, not bad. Another tells us Let a woman learn in quietness with all subjection. But I permit not a woman to teach, nor to have dominion over a man, but to be in quietness (1 Timothy 2:11-12). Um, really bad.

Unapologetically, as a Christian and as a woman, I cannot accept as infallible any scripture or doctrine that tells me I can never work above men. I know it might seem a little counter intuitive to establish my rejection of scripture in my Christian faith (huh?), but bear with me just a little bit longer.

Feminist theology, far from the angry bra-burning radical feminism of the 1960’s and 70’s revolves around the principle of full humanity. That doesn’t sound too crazy, right? If you don’t call it feminist theology, then we’re talking about something very basic, that each person is brought into this world and bestowed with the Imago Dei, then deserves to flourish fully as a human. Rosemary Radford Ruether, a renowned feminist theologian writes, “The critical principle of feminist theology is the promotion of the full humanity of women. Whatever denies, diminishes, or distorts the full humanity of women is, therefore, appraised as not redemptive” (Reuther, Sexism and God-talk 18). But beyond just women, “Any principle of religion or society that marginalizes one group of persons as less than fully human diminishes us all” (Ruether, Sexism and God-talk 20). Therefore, thoughts and actions that promote the full humanity of women (and any other marginalized or oppressed group of people) are holy; thoughts and actions that don’t are not. Furthermore, this feminist voice is not asking for women to be treated as men, as that would be supporting masculinity as normative. Instead, women claim their own identity and ask for love and respect as a child of God in whatever way they choose to flourish.

To bring this back to the article, it seems to me that if a woman of such incredible power and privilege feels like she cannot have a leading role in the workplace and simultaneously be a good mother to her teenage boys, then something is fundamentally wrong; it is most especially wrong because men can have a leading role in the workplace and simultaneously be considered a good dad.

Anne-Marie Slaughter, an accomplished academic and foreign policy analyst, doesn’t believe things will change until one half of senators, one half of CEO’s and top executives, and one half of tenured professors (among many other professions) are women. We don’t just need women in the workplace; we need women in leadership roles in the workplace. But women must claim the power and authority themselves. We cannot advocate for our full humanity and expect men to give it to us. That’s a little backwards, don’t you think? The motivation to change the system will emerge out of both anger and hope; anger at the injustice (and at the fact that too many people won’t acknowledge it as an injustice) and hope for a world without sexism, a world where all practices contribute to the full humanity of all persons, a world where all practices are redemptive.

Previous Post

June 28, 2012

What Today Truly Means

Next Post

July 5, 2012 Why I'm a Faithful Democrat

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, 'The Lord gives and the Lord takes away'?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Solomon Moses Job