Politics of a Seamless Garment: Catholic Universities, HHS and Onward

Last updated on: August 20, 2012 at 8:04 pm by John McCarthy

Politics of a Seamless Garment: Catholic Universities, HHS and Onward 2012-08-20T20:04:19-06:00 John McCarthy

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In December of 1983 Joseph Cardinal Bernardin was invited to give an address on Catholic Teaching and the American body Politic. In a crowded room at Fordham University he introduced an important thought: “I am convinced that the pro-life position of the Church must be developed in terms of a comprehensive and consistent ethic of life.” This idea was of course, greeted by many as heresy and seen as another caveat through which the laity could dissent from the church.

We, the faithful many, have a greater call now more than ever to truly understand Cardinal Bernardin’s call to the politics of a “seamless garment.”

Several Catholic Universities, charities and health agencies recently filed a lawsuit against the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Rev. John Jenkins, President of Notre Dame said, “this filing is about the freedom of a religious organization to live its mission, and its significance goes well beyond any debate about contraceptives…It is for these reasons that we have filed this lawsuit neither lightly nor gladly, but with sober determination.” While I understand their convictions and determination to live out their faith, many people in the laity are asking why this issue? Why now?

Certainly the issue is incredibly charged and many people see the faith as under attack but we must go further than that and ask ourselves, is this all we should be speaking out against? Catholics in pews around the country heard their pulpits ringing in unison about our faith being under siege. Students at Catholic Universities around the country found their Theology classes inundated with message “this administration is anti-catholic.” Some see this united-front of preaching-points as a tough stand, but many lay people are wondering where the church has been on all the other issues.

The Ryan-Republican Budget makes 62% of its proposed cuts from low-income programs such as Medicaid, Pell grants, food stamps and job training. It dismantles Medicare as we know it, slashes the Supplemental Nutrition Program and shows a total disregard to those living on the margins of society. The budget opens with a letter stating it serves, “…America’s political, economic and moral imperatives.” While the Bishops have come out against the budget, they have not down so with an ounce of the same fervor they have demonstrated over the contraceptive mandate. Perhaps further than that, where have the universities, catholic non-profits and health agencies been on these issues?

We need to return to a—albeit more difficult—comprehensive politics of a “seamless garment.”

Cardinal Bernardin tells us that in a time where we can do almost anything, we must ask ourselves what we ought to be doing—applying these questions to a human life spectrum of “womb to tomb.” He willingly admits that it is not within his competency as a Bishop to declare what this ethic must imply but realizes, “It is to that task that philosophers and poets, theologians and technicians, scientists and strategists, political leaders and plain citizens are called.” This fosters the need for a full participation of the laity into the direction and discussion of our mother church.

I am not offended that the Bishops and these religious organizations show such tenacity at defending our faith. I am offended that we are spending so much effort on this issue that is wildly divisive amongst the laity. Church leadership often shows concern for a lack of understanding amongst the laity when dealing with issues of morality and dogma. However, can we blame the laity when as an institution we have shown favor for some issues and failed to truly cultivate a holistic understanding of our teachings?

If we are to be filing lawsuits in order to stand up for our faith, we must work more towards actively living, preaching and sharing that faith. Political involvement should be a seamless garment: no issue is seen as more important than the other, but is seen as part of ordering society towards the common good. If we’re going to be stuffing bulletins with notes on contraception we surely better follow up with notes on the budget, the environment, immigration policy and the other of countless issues we write on.

Failure to embrace such a politics of a seamless garment would only continue to divide the laity and slip more towards the out-of-touch institution, many Catholics believe we have become.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

May 18, 2012

Last Friday's Evangelical Conference Call

Next Post

May 28, 2012 The Founding Values of America!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Mark's Gospel is the shortest of the four Gospels.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE