Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Faithful Democrats

Home
Politics and Religion
Budgetary myths that Christians should reject, Part 2:

Budgetary myths that Christians should reject, Part 2:

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:06 am by Faithful Democrats

Budgetary myths that Christians should reject, Part 2: 2013-05-09T06:06:45-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Poverty is incredibly specific. It affects specific men, women, and children-not just the amorphous (and thus easily dismissed) “poor.”

“Welfare is the Church’s responsibility, not the government’s”

Government was intended to secure the rights and freedoms of the people; it wasn’t intended to be all things to all people. When I look at the fact that we need to strengthen law enforcement, government does that. But then what I’m doing is going to the charity side, the private sector side, to take care of those who are in need. It’s not that Republicans don’t care–Republicans just don’t think government should pay for it, and there’re other ways to accomplish these things.

CONGRESS DISCONTINUES WELFARE PROGRAM

Which churches/religious institutions/private charities should be included? Are you comfortable with services being provided by Catholics? By Mormons? By Muslims? By atheists? By Wiccans?

Which “churches” are legitimately part of “the Church”? Who gets to decide who is in and who is out?

Which poor should be included? By what criteria should they be identified, and who gets to determine who qualifies and who doesn’t? Would there be an appeals process if a deserving candidate got turned down by a stricter part of the private charity coalition?

What extent of care should be provided, and with what standards of care?

Who ensures that individual churches do not care for fewer than their allotted percentage of the poor people in their community, or that they don’t skimp when even when they do care for all of those in their reach?

Who decides which church cares for which poor people?

Even if tithing capacity were sufficient to cover the costs of the above programs (which it does not appear to be), why should caring for the poor involve the sacrifice of money that would be used to spread the Gospel, educate believers, or make it easier for believers to worship God rather than the money that a tobacco company CEO or a casino owner (for example) might-in light of a lighter tax burden-use to buy a second yacht?

In an interview last month with Christianity Today’s Sarah Pulliam Bailey, South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley was asked “How would you respond to Christian relief organizations that have expressed concern over the government cutting funding to programs that aid the world’s poor?” Her response is noteworthy:

A less sophisticated but clearer example of this general idea is found in Bob Nance’s 1986 DOS game “Christian Text Adventure,” which contains the following fictitious newspaper article:

(API) Congress today unanimously voted to abandon the Welfare program. “Since Christians across the nation have begun to tithe again, churches have had the funds to provide food and medical care to ALL the needy people in their communities”, said Congressman John Stennis, III of Mississippi. “It is no longer necessary for us to tax the population in order to provide these services, therefore, there will be widespread cuts in income tax.”

Both Haley and Nance make an interesting argument: it isn’t that conservative Christians don’t care about the poor, but rather that government just needs to get out of the way (and cut taxes) so Christians can pay for all needed social services through their tithes. Haley’s critics–including many affiliated with the very nonprofit and religious aid agencies she is expecting to take up the slack for the government–charge that this is a cop-out, and that private charities and churches lack the resources to take on the state’s part of the job too.

In a white paper released Friday by Eastvold Strategies, I took a stab at testing this claim by figuring out how much money would be generated annually if all regular churchgoers tithed a full ten percent and then comparing this to the cost of selected social welfare programs that might arguably be tackled by the Church instead.

I estimated the ideal annual tithe (if active churchgoers each donated ten percent of their income) as somewhere between $255 billion and $354 billion, and the cost of the programs that would need to be covered at slightly more than $1,060 billion (a full discussion of my methodology and listing of the programs counted can be found in the paper).

Currently, the average cost per American for these programs comes to $3,458.65. Limiting this to active churchgoers, the annual cost would be between $10,982.09 and $16,473.13 per regular congregant. The share of this cost for an average church of 75 members would thus be between $823,656.55 and $1.24 million per year–which is a daunting figure even for affluent congregations.

For the argument that churches, not government, should be performing social services to be anything more than a cop-out, its advocates must provide specific answers to each of the following questions:

Poverty is incredibly specific. It affects specific men, women, and children-not just the amorphous (and thus easily dismissed) “poor.” If anyone had the time, resources, and intestinal fortitude to measure it, there would be a specific number of meals missed per day, a specific number of deaths each year from treatable conditions left to fester because of inadequate care, etc. To effectively address it, any proposed solutions must be equally specific.

Unless a specific proposal can be brought to the table that satisfactorily answers these questions while explaining how the cost of these programs will be borne, proposals in this vein must be dismissed as bad-faith attempts at buck-passing.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

May 2, 2012

Why I am a Democrat

Next Post

May 15, 2012 My Political Story and Journey

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What natural disaster did God use to destroy the earth in Noah’s time?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fire Famine Flood Earthquake