Why the Ryan Budget is a Values Issue

Last updated on: August 20, 2012 at 8:01 pm by Joe Brennan

Why the Ryan Budget is a Values Issue 2012-08-20T20:01:37-06:00 Joe Brennan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

If recent weeks are any indication, the Republicans hope to make this election season all about values. And, considering the President’s record of job creation and economic growth, the Republicans’ strategy may be the only option. But, if the GOP wants to talk about values, I propose they take a critical look at Paul Ryan’s budget.

Political scientist David Easton writes that politics is “the authoritative allocation of values for a society.” And in an election season increasingly focused on the so-called “values issues,” Easton’s words ring true. However, Easton’s definition understands values more broadly than those talking points to which the GOP normally subscribes. For Easton, “values” can mean goods and services that citizens see as important as well as attitudes about those things society should value.Thus, the distribution of these values is at the very heart of the political process. I argue that the budget is a values issue for three reasons:

1. It determines who gets what;

2. It determines what we care for; and

3. It determines whether we are a society who provides for the “least of these”

Time and again, the Republicans have offered their solution to the deficit: Cut taxes, cut spending on essential services for the poor and middle class, and pray that the math works out in the end. Paul Ryan’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2013 is no exception.

The Ryan budget calls for enormous tax benefits for the wealthiest American individuals and big corporations, all paid for by repealing vital programs like the Affordable Care Act, and cutting spending on Medicare, Medicaid, education, and infrastructure. Ryan’s plan also proposes drastic cuts to spending on diplomacy and international development while dramatically increasing spending on the military.

The Ryan budget is a values issue. It determines that the wealthiest Americans get the most and give the least. At the same time, it asks the poor to give the most and get very little in return. It says that we care for big oil companies and Wall Street executives at the expense of a clean environment and an educated population. By cutting spending on crucial international development programs, the Ryan budget determines that military excess is more important than vital programs that help lift our global neighbors out of poverty. If adopted, the Ryan budget will have real consequences for real people.

But we can be a nation that does what’s right while also doing what works. Providing targeted resources to help alleviate the problem of global poverty is the right thing to do, but it also contributes to stability and prosperity in places that are known to be ideal breeding grounds for terrorism. The Affordable Care Act provides access to healthcare for millions of Americans who wouldn’t otherwise have insurance, but it also means that we will lower overall costs by encouraging a healthier population. By stewarding the environment with care, we ensure that future generations will breath cleaner air, drink cleaner water, and lead healthier lives. The same common sense applies to education. A more educated population means a more competitive workforce and a stronger economy. And, while we need a robust and well-equipped military, we can prevent conflicts before they escalate to the use of arms and the grave expense of war by engaging in smart and consistent diplomacy.

As people of faith, we are called to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, care for the sick, and steward the environment. In the end, what we do for the poor and vulnerable—what we do for the “least of these”—we do for God. But we don’t have to do those things at the expense of good policy.

So, if the Republicans want to make this election about values, let’s agree to throw away the Ryan budget.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

March 20, 2012

President Obama and the Fake 'War on Religion'

Next Post

March 24, 2012 Faithful Democrats, It's Time to Stand UP

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the primary light source in Biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Torch Candle Bonfire Oil lamp