We don’t want believers to be the lap dogs of either party

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:06 am by Faithful Democrats

We don’t want believers to be the lap dogs of either party 2013-05-09T06:06:48-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Critics of the Faithful Democrats movement raise a point that is actually quite fair: “Aren’t you just reacting to the unhealthy closeness between the Church and the political right by luring the Church into the arms of the political left instead? Are you really any better?” That is an insightful question, and one which any responsible Christian on either side of the aisle must continually ask. The 20th century Methodist missionary E. Stanley Jones famously stated that “if the church marries the spirit of the age, it will be a widow in the next generation.” It is easy for us to identify the hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of the religious right’s fusion of faith and politics–and much more difficult to perceive our own blind spots where we are tempted to compromise the Gospel.

The danger of this happening can be reduced (though, of course, never eliminated entirely) by keeping in mind three principles:

First, we must recognize that we will never–by our political actions–bring about the Kingdom of God. That is way above our pay grade. We are rather, as Augustine writes in the City of God, pilgrims on our way to an eternal city who work for the temporary peace of the earthly city where we’re staying now. It is not our job–or within our power–to create heaven on earth. With a good bit of prayer, a lot of hard work, and a little help from God, however, we may be able to hold back hell on earth–and temporarily ensure that our political communities are characterized (however imperfectly) by a little more order and justice.

Second, time may change the “right” decision for politically involved Christians. Lord Palmerston, a nineteenth-century British prime minister, once famously stated that Britain had “no permanent allies-just permanent interests.” I would argue that the same principle applies to the Church. Our political interests–making sure that evil is restrained, the poor are treated with justice and compassion, the environment is properly cared for, and the Gospel is given a fair shot at competing in an open marketplace of ideas–are currently best served by aligning with the Democratic party. Will this be the case forever? Looking at how history has changed both parties, the best answer is “probably not” (even though the current foibles of the Republican Party make it unlikely that it will be able to compete seriously for our votes in the next few years). A political alliance that was right in one decade may be wrong in the next. Even once a believer figures out which “side” she’s on, she is not relieved of the ongoing responsibility to hold her political beliefs in an open hand–constantly reevaluating them in light of her progressively mature relationship with God, further study of Scripture, and the ebb and flow of current events.

Finally, our political categories are not God’s political categories, and we’re certainly not perfect. We take the political positions we do because we believe that they are the most faithful application of God’s Word to the complexities of politics. But, even so, as fallen humans who will inevitably get things wrong, nothing we do is completely free of sin and error–and little, if anything, that our opponents do will not have at least some moral or pragmatic validity. Ultimately, we have to acknowledge the truth of Lincoln’s observation that we should be much less concerned about whether God is on our side than with whether we are on God’s side.

So, if you are a critic, we welcome your good-faith disagreement–and we covet your prayers. May God continue to guide all of us toward more faithful ways of doing His will, and may non-believers know that we are God’s disciples by our love for one another (and for them)…regardless of our political leanings.

Featured Writers

Previous Post

March 20, 2012

President Obama and the Fake 'War on Religion'

Next Post

March 24, 2012 Faithful Democrats, It's Time to Stand UP

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What prophet multiplied a widow's jar of oil so she could pay her debts?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Amos Micah Elijah Elisha