Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Faithful Democrats

A cry from the political wilderness

Last updated on: August 16, 2012 at 3:38 pm   by Eric Sapp

A cry from the political wilderness 2012-08-16T15:38:23-06:00 Eric Sapp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When examining the morality of a society or government, most people would probably argue that the most important thing to look at is how it acted.  I would argue, however, that it is at least as important to look at how the society or government justifies its actions.  Often, such an exploration of justification simply demonstrates a deep-seeded hypocrisy, but for all the incredible harm of hypocrisy, it does have the one redeeming quality that hypocrisy at least aspires to something better and recognizes what is right.  It is true that hypocrisy is the only sin in the NT to receive a divine death penalty, but it at least stems from some minimal guilt in not doing the right thing.  And where there is guilt, there can be repentance.  And where there is repentance, there can be grace.  So a hypocritical society/government at least still holds to the truth by the thinnest of threads, and because of that, there is still hope for redemption.

 

Believe it or not, that somewhat existential tangent resulted from my trying to understand my strong emotional reaction to the press coverage of the stimulus package.  I have been deeply bothered by the Republican response to the stimulus, especially in the House.  But despite my often-partisan vocation, Republicans seldom really upset me.  I hail from those Democrats who chose that label because we believe that, on balance, Democrats get more things right…rather than from those Democrats who chose that label mostly because they hate or fear the other side.  So the fact that I had such a strong emotional reaction to GOP messaging around the stimulus surprised me.

 

I spent several years on the Hill handling budget issues, and so I recognize that part of my reaction is due to the fact that suddenly the GOP is talking about the need for fiscal discipline…and I am frustrated a bit that Democrats are not taking every opportunity they can to remind the American people that Republicans only became fiscal conservatives when they lost the ability to spend taxpayer dollars.  If you look at Regan, Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush 2, Bill Clinton was the only president to balance the budget and reduce the deficit.  Compare that to President Bush who added more to the national debt than ALL previous presidents combined, wrecked our economy, and oversaw the largest expansion of the federal government since the New Deal…all with the blessing and encouragement of the GOP Congress.  So the GOP’s donning of the “fiscal conservative” mantle would be a joke if the hypocrisy wasn’t so appalling.

 

But as I sought to discern my emotions, I came to understand that GOP fiscal hypocrisy wasn’t what upset me…what was really troubling me was both the absence of hypocrisy in the way the GOP leadership has been discussing their political strategy and the way the media has responded.  GOP House Minority Leader John A. Boehner told colleagues on Wednesday that they could turn a loss on the stimulus package to their political advantage if they stood fast and united in their opposition to the bill.  He argued that this would create a powerful political narrative and help redefine Republicans as fiscal conservatives, which they can use to differentiate and attack Democrats in 2010.  So even though Republicans might take a short-term political hit by voting against the stimulus American people want, the long-term political benefits would far outweigh the short-term costs.

 

Let’s unpack that logic a minute.  Congressional Republicans are working to prevent the creation of a truly bipartisan stimulus bill and plan to vote against legislation that would keep American families from having their homes foreclosed and workers from losing their jobs…so that Republicans can better justify their vote against the bill, which is intended to help them create a political narrative that they can use to attack Democrats two years from now.

 

And the media has become so obsessed with the horse race and strategic aspects of politics (I’ve read a number of commentators from Washington Post to Politico talking about how this could be a smart move for Republicans), that no one is pointing out how unbelievably screwed up that logic and the fact that they would make it public is!

 

We are not talking about a computer chess match but about people’s lives.  This is not about numbers but about God’s children.  But to help GOP campaigns write better attack ads in the next election, GOP “Representatives of the people” are choosing to vote to force American workers to face the soul-crushing responsibility of coming home to tell their family that they’ve lost their job and will lose their home…the house where they first carried their wife over the threshold …the one where they spent a weekend painting giraffes on the walls of the first baby’s bedroom…the place where they are part of a community and dreamed of raising their children with a future better than their own.  The hopes and dreams of millions of Americans are being callously discarded by “strategists” so the GOP can tap into the despair that will follow to win voters in two years.  And they are bragging about doing so and getting credit for their “discipline” by political commentators?!

 

When political leaders and those who report on them stop even pretending to care about doing the right thing in politics, there is no longer a chance that people will feel guilt for abusing their power and institutionalizing injustice.  Without guilt, there can be no repentance, no grace, and we are left with little hope.

 

If Americans outside the political and media establishment do not immediately begin to raise a cry for our elected leaders to repent, I fear that our end may be truly near.

 

Featured Writers

Previous Post



February 11, 2009

Balancing Personal Faith and Politics

Next Post



February 17, 2009 Tune My Heart To Sing Thy Grace: God And The Stimulus


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Jesus' earthly father?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joseph Joachim Zechariah Simeon

Related posts from Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

King, Isaiah, and the Politics of Now

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Stone Soup for the Soul: An Intern’s Lesson...

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Secret Confessions from the GOP Nominee: A Response

Faithful Democrats

Politics Blue

Two American Dreams and One Economic Reality

Faithful Democrats

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Gas Prices: What Would Jesus Pay?

Many of my conservative Christian friends have been having a field day...

Jesus Was a Social Deviant: A Brief History...

  Americans like to say that this country was founded on the...

On Max Lucado Preaching At Washington National Cathedral

There has been a bit of controversy over the past week about...

Digital Deception: How We Ended Up Here And...

The American experiment has reached its moment of reckoning, and we seem...

“The evangelical vote is more diverse than you...

Rev. Jim Ball, EFB Co-Chair, is one of the voices featured in...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube