Obama and Faith-Based Initiatives

Last updated on: August 16, 2012 at 3:26 pm by Eric Sapp

Obama and Faith-Based Initiatives 2012-08-16T15:26:00-06:00 Eric Sapp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When the Democratic candidate for president starts talking about expanding the faith-based initiative programme, you know this isn’t your father’s Democratic party anymore. But, of course, the programme he’s talking about isn’t your father’s faith-based initiative either. So I guess we’ve just entered a whole new generation of political discourse in America.

Before delving into the speech itself, it’s worth taking a moment to point out that one reason Barack Obama’s faith outreach has been so effective is that it is dovetailing perfectly with the rise of a new generation of leaders in the American Church, especially in evangelical circles. The members of this younger generation still care about abortion and marriage, but they also care deeply about the environment, poverty, Aids in Africa and torture. And from their ranks have risen groups like the Matthew 25 Network, which are defending Obama against attacks from the religious right while fighting to expand the faith and values debate in American politics.

It is into that unique point in America’s political history that Obama stepped on Tuesday to deliver an unexpected speech about how and why, as president, he would expand the faith-based initiative programme. To fully appreciate his remarks, one needs to understand the political lightning rod that the faith-based initiative has become in recent years.

The programme was actually created by President Bill Clinton. But when George Bush came to office – as he did with so many other parts of the executive branch – he turned the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives (OFBI) into a partisan, political tool (David Kuo, former OFBI director, wrote a tell-all book detailing abuse after abuse in the programme). And the secular left reacted exactly as the Bush strategists hoped, by using extreme language to condemn the entire programme and the churches associated with it that Republicans immediately quoted in mailers and fundraising appeals to the faith community.

The result was that many Republican voters began to see the faith-based initiative as a symbol of secular disdain for the positive role faith plays in American society, while many Democrats saw it as proof positive that theocracy was the ultimate goal of any faith-based engagement in the public square. Of course, neither understanding was correct, but both narratives served their purpose by scaring a different segment of society into action against the other. But as Obama has done time and again, his speech on Tuesday directly confronted the politics of division and fear that has defined American politics during the Bush years.

Obama began his speech by embracing the positive and vital role faith communities play in American society and in caring for the least of these. He applauded the principles of the faith-based initiatives and the need to expand it while also acknowledging that a good programme had been taken down a bad path by unscrupulous politicians who twisted it from a service programme into a partisan tool. Finally, he made clear that while it was appropriate for government to support faith programmes that were providing support for the least of these in our society, government dollars could never be used to proselytise or discriminate.

His speech was hailed by another of Bush’s former heads of OFBI, John DiIulio, as a “principled, prudent and problem-solving vision” that reminded him of “much that was best in both of then-vice-president Al Gore’s and then-Texas governor George W Bush’s first speeches on the subject in 1999.”

No doubt, some on the left will be upset by Obama’s remarks (and some on the right who will nit-pick them or reject them completely). After all, there will always be those who fear the end of war (even a culture war), either because they fear the unknown that peace may bring or because they know that their power and influence will fade when the enemy is gone.

But even with the dissent, this is a wise political move for Obama, and one that I expect most Americans will applaud, because Obama moved this debate on the OFBI from one about right and left to one about right and wrong. Because of that, we can hope that at the end of the day, the real winners won’t be Democrats or Republicans but the “least of these” among us who will finally get some of the help they so desperately need.

Published in The Guardian, Wed July 2

Featured Writers

Previous Post

July 2, 2008

Good Sounding Policy Versus Good, Sound Policy

Next Post

July 8, 2008 Israel and America: Of Blood and Borders

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the last king of Judah before the Babylonian exile?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Zedekiah Hezekiah Jehoiakim