A Deeper, Fuller Conversation About Religion In This Country

Last updated on: May 9, 2013 at 6:07 am by Faithful Democrats

A Deeper, Fuller Conversation About Religion In This Country 2013-05-09T06:07:36-06:00 Faithful Democrats

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This addresses the need to renew Senator Obama's call for A Deeper, Fuller Conversation About Religion In This Country.

Over the course of just a few hours, the vibrant and ongoing conversation about faith during the 2008 election has been obfuscated by a few comments,which so many opportunists are now peddling as “religious controversy.” We may not even be sure what to make of these cherry-picked sound bites taken from a single speech given on June 28, 2006. Pulled out of the context of the speech (and the candidate’s broader ideas about the importance of his faith), it is easy to exploit a few words to garner attention and cause a clamor. That’s the easy way to approach all of this.

But arguing over petty he-said-he-said matters is not going to do a single thing to serve those who are suffering during an ever-worsening economic downturn. Neither will trifling over a few select words help us discern anything worthwhile about the heart and mind of this man who seeks the Presidency. One thing is certain: such a course of action will do much less for us than we could learn by holistically considering the choices he has made and the life he has lived. Yet instant media is not engineered to provide such nuance and subtlety. And human beings were not wonderfully made to be reduced to these few phrases or sound bites played ad infinitum. So here we find ourselves, yet again, at our erstwhile impasse in which a worthwhile and meaningful discussion becomes replaced with fervor and vitriol and then repeated, repeated, repeated.

Before getting too mired in a Reverend Wright redux, though, let’s not forget that even in the midst of the sensationalization and stigmatization that the twenty-four hour news cycle can giveth or taketh away, Obama’s words should be quite familiar to our ears. This isn’t to be flippant, but were these words really worth the attention we are giving them? I mean, even the West Wing riffed on this once upon a time with very similar turns of phrases:

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHaVUjjH3EI&feature=related

Audio: http://www.mediaresearch.org/audiobias/vidclips/2006/profiles/2000-10-18-NBCWW.mp3

But back to the main point. Regardless of your thoughts about Senator Obama’s theology, or even his candidacy, it is dishonest to the discourse to focus on a few words while failing to acknowledge the larger context of what else he stated during the course of the speech from June 28, 2006. Here’s just a short excerpt:

Pastors,friends of mine like Rick Warren and T.D. Jakes are wielding their enormous influences to confront AIDS, Third World debt relief, and the genocide in Darfur. Religious thinkers and activists like our good friend Jim Wallis and Tony Campolo are lifting up the Biblical injunction to help the poor as a means of mobilizing Christians against budget cuts to social programs and growing inequality.

And by the way, we need Christians on Capitol Hill, Jews on Capitol Hill and Muslims on Capitol Hill talking about the estate tax. When you've got an estate tax debate that proposes a trillion dollars being taken out of social programs to go to a handful of folks who don't need and weren't even asking for it, you know that we need an injection of morality in our political debate.

Across the country, individual churches like my own and your own are sponsoring day care programs, building senior centers, helping ex-offenders reclaim their lives, and rebuilding our gulf coast in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

So the question is, how do we build on these still-tentative partnerships between religious and secular people of good will? It's going to take more work, a lot more work than we've done so far. The tensions and the suspicions on each side of the religious divide will have to be squarely addressed. And each side will need to accept some ground rules for collaboration.

Areas impacted by Katrina remain in grave need of an immense rebuilding and rejuvenation effort, as well as the financial, political, and prayerful support of the leaders and people of this nation. Our amnesia about Katrina is exemplary of how our attention has shifted to pettier purposes, but there are so many American problems requiring a truly American response that we simply have not given for whatever reason. There are too many suffering people within our nation’s boundaries to whom we are all inextricably bound, each and every one of us, as citizens of this great country. It is an appalling disservice to the least fortunate among us – and a horrible underestimation of our collective capacity to achieve the common good – if we do not right these wrongs where we can as a nation. When we instead stand idly by, watching this election shift away from the important issues and deteriorate into this kind of accusatory, destructive rhetoric, then we have failed in our democratic responsibility.

So today, we watched as images flashed across our television and computer screens showing anger and desperation, disagreement and divisiveness, and blame, blame, blame. Tomorrow, we can each personally respond by reaching out to others more compassionately in our own individual ways.

Today, we listened to the media-driven drivel about a few supposedly radical comments that Obama once made. Tomorrow, we can begin listening and sharing in what Barack Obama once proposed when he called for“a deeper, fuller conversation about religion in this country.” We might start by checking with the source of that phrase, in perhaps the unlikeliest of places, a speech given on June 28, 2006.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/060628-call_to_renewal/

Playlist

Local

Pop Get this player

Playlist

1. http://www.mediaresearch.org/audiobias/vidclips/2006/profiles/2000-10-18-NBCWW.mp3

Featured Writers

Previous Post

June 10, 2008

McCain and Bush Virtually indestinguishable on most issues

Next Post

June 30, 2008 Patriotism: "Last Refuge of a Scoundrel!"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category About Us About Us Action Center Advertise Ask a Theologian Ask a Theologian Blogs Books Campaign Blog Candidate Spotlights Commentary Donate Facebook Featured Writers Fellows Fellows From the Pulpit General Information Hillary Clinton Interfaith Blog Latest Media Center Media Center Media Center MyBlog MyBlog News Newsflash Newsflashes Our Team Reader Blogs RSS Sermon of the Week Shop Social Networking Static Items Support Talking Points Test blogs The Basics Theology Uncategorized YouTube

Select a Month November 2020 October 2020 February 2020 August 2019 July 2018 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 January 2006 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Song of Solomon is also called Song of Songs.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE